Dear "Teh Kok How",
please do not top-post / full quote.
In message <8f43dbaafe554067877fd8568cab4...@smartbridges.com> you wrote:
>
> Sorry, been away for 1 week. The constant 10 is the size of an array
> that is arbitrarily chosen so that it is big enough to hold the current mtd
> device
[mailto:w...@denx.de]
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 11:28 PM
To: Teh Kok How
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH]: common/cmd_flash.c: bug-fix
Dear "Teh Kok How",
In message <89d4e2cb6b654b3fb0da6a0ce6650...@smartbridges.com> you wrote:
>
> --- u-boot
Dear "Teh Kok How",
In message <89d4e2cb6b654b3fb0da6a0ce6650...@smartbridges.com> you wrote:
>
> --- u-boot-2009.11.1.orig/common/cmd_flash.c2010-01-25
> 16:35:12.0 +0800
> +++ u-boot-2009.11.1.new/common/cmd_flash.c 2010-02-12
> 16:18:10.565540182 +0800
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
>
>
On Friday 12 February 2010 10:16:36 Teh Kok How wrote:
> - What exactly are you trying to fix? Please add a small description
> on what's broken and how your patch fixes it.
> => Fixes wrong argument to mtd_id_parse that affects u-boot command `erase`
> and `protect` . This fix passes the correct
- What exactly are you trying to fix? Please add a small description
on what's broken and how your patch fixes it.
=> Fixes wrong argument to mtd_id_parse that affects u-boot command `erase`
and `protect` . This fix passes the correct part-id to the commands
so that `erase rootfs` and `protect ro
On Friday 12 February 2010 09:31:17 Teh Kok How wrote:
> --- u-boot-2009.11.1.orig/common/cmd_flash.c2010-01-25
> 16:35:12.0 +0800
>
> +++ u-boot-2009.11.1.new/common/cmd_flash.c 2010-02-12
> 16:18:10.565540182 +0800
>
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
>
>
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH
>
--- u-boot-2009.11.1.orig/common/cmd_flash.c2010-01-25
16:35:12.0 +0800
+++ u-boot-2009.11.1.new/common/cmd_flash.c 2010-02-12
16:18:10.565540182 +0800
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
#ifndef CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH
extern flash_info_t flash_info[]; /* info for FLASH chips */
+extern s
7 matches
Mail list logo
