On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Hello Lokesh,
>
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:48:31 +0530, Lokesh Vutla
> wrote:
>> Hi Albert,
>> On Wednesday 01 July 2015 06:43 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>> > Hello all,
>> >
>> > I get the following when building current u-boot-arm/master with
Hello Lokesh,
On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:48:31 +0530, Lokesh Vutla
wrote:
> Hi Albert,
> On Wednesday 01 July 2015 06:43 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I get the following when building current u-boot-arm/master with
> > current u-boot/master:
> >
> > * WARNING: no status info for
Hi Albert,
On Wednesday 01 July 2015 06:43 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I get the following when building current u-boot-arm/master with
> current u-boot/master:
>
> * WARNING: no status info for 'am43xx_evm_ethboot'
> * WARNING: no maintainers for 'am43xx_evm_ethboot'
> WARNING
On Wednesday, July 01, 2015 at 03:31:01 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > WARNING: no status info for 'socfpga_arria5'
> > WARNING: no maintainers for 'socfpga_arria5'
>
> I guess Marek or Dinh would be willing to mainain Arria 5.
Yep, I have an AV board.
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
___
Hi Albert,
On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 15:13 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I get the following when building current u-boot-arm/master with
> current u-boot/master:
>
> * WARNING: no status info for 'am43xx_evm_ethboot'
> * WARNING: no maintainers for 'am43xx_evm_ethboot'
> WARNING
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I get the following when building current u-boot-arm/master with
> current u-boot/master:
>
> * WARNING: no status info for 'am43xx_evm_ethboot'
> * WARNING: no maintainers for 'am43xx_evm_ethboot'
> WARNING: no status info f
Hi!
> WARNING: no status info for 'socfpga_arria5'
> WARNING: no maintainers for 'socfpga_arria5'
I guess Marek or Dinh would be willing to mainain Arria 5.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(
Hello all,
I get the following when building current u-boot-arm/master with
current u-boot/master:
* WARNING: no status info for 'am43xx_evm_ethboot'
* WARNING: no maintainers for 'am43xx_evm_ethboot'
WARNING: no status info for 'cairo'
WARNING: no maintainers for 'cairo'
WARNING: no st
Hello all,
I've been away for a few days, and back to U-Boot duties today. As
usual, I will handle merge requests first, then patches (oldest first),
but before this I'll be finishing and submitting a patch series for
factoring the ARM relocation routine.
As usual too, anything you want to point
Hello all,
I have gone through my todo list on Patchwork and I think I have
processed all patches and applied all the ones posted within the
merge window or that are bug fixes for v2013.04 and for which no
changes requests are pending.
However, I may have missed some, so as usual, do mail To: me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/12/12 03:00, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Minkyu,
>
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 15:45:24 +0900, Minkyu Kang
> wrote:
>
>> On 12 October 2012 15:39, Minkyu Kang
>> wrote:
>>> Dear Albert,
>>>
>>> On 12 October 2012 14:53, Albert ARIBAUD
>>> wrote
Hi Minkyu,
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 15:45:24 +0900, Minkyu Kang
wrote:
> On 12 October 2012 15:39, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> > Dear Albert,
> >
> > On 12 October 2012 14:53, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I am sending this notice because I have force-pushed a rollback of
> >> u-boot-arm/ma
On 12 October 2012 15:39, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear Albert,
>
> On 12 October 2012 14:53, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am sending this notice because I have force-pushed a rollback of
>> u-boot-arm/master.
>>
>> This is due to the recently submitted u-boot-arm/master pull request
>> b
Dear Albert,
On 12 October 2012 14:53, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am sending this notice because I have force-pushed a rollback of
> u-boot-arm/master.
>
> This is due to the recently submitted u-boot-arm/master pull request
> being NAKed by Tom: the content of this pull req was exactl
Hi all,
I am sending this notice because I have force-pushed a rollback of
u-boot-arm/master.
This is due to the recently submitted u-boot-arm/master pull request
being NAKed by Tom: the content of this pull req was exactly that of
the latest u-boot-samsung/master pull req and was a fast forward
Hi all,
Subject says most of all... Anyone intending to request a pull into
u-boot-arm/master should make sure to rebase onto it as needed.
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boo
Hi Albert,
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I just did another round of ./MAKEALL arm with MG/CS 2011.09-69, and the
> failure rate is rising to say the least, with 277 boards failing out of 278.
> :(
>
> Basically, the issues are, in order of impact:
>
> - Now
Dear Albert,
In message <4f8ffd0e.60...@aribaud.net> you wrote:
>
> master) and the right toolchain ("gcc version 4.6.1 (Sourcery CodeBench
> Lite 2011.09-69)"), ./MAKEALL arm shows the following:
Note: you should run out-of-tree builds; this usually catches a bunch
of additional problems.
> -
Le 19/04/2012 12:04, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
Hi Wolfgang,
Le 19/04/2012 11:51, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message<4f8fbb22.5000...@aribaud.net> you wrote:
Folks,
I just did another round of ./MAKEALL arm with MG/CS 2011.09-69, and the
failure rate is rising to say the l
Hi Wolfgang,
Le 19/04/2012 11:51, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message<4f8fbb22.5000...@aribaud.net> you wrote:
Folks,
I just did another round of ./MAKEALL arm with MG/CS 2011.09-69, and the
failure rate is rising to say the least, with 277 boards failing out of
278. :(
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message <4f8fbb22.5000...@aribaud.net> you wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I just did another round of ./MAKEALL arm with MG/CS 2011.09-69, and the
> failure rate is rising to say the least, with 277 boards failing out of
> 278. :(
Which version of GCC is this?
Recent tests with E
Folks,
I just did another round of ./MAKEALL arm with MG/CS 2011.09-69, and the
failure rate is rising to say the least, with 277 boards failing out of
278. :(
Basically, the issues are, in order of impact:
- Now 264 'uses variable-size enums yet the output is to use 32-bit
enums' errors. T
Hi all,
I have just done a ./MAKEALL arm with the Mentor Graphics / CodeSourcery
toochain release 2011.09-69, and the results are:
- 277 targets built
- 32 targets with warnings
- 3 targets with errors
Of the 61 warnings generated, there are only two sorts:
- 48 'warning:
/opt/arm-2011.09/b
Hi Marek,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Simon Glass,
>
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> > Dear Simon Glass,
>> >
>> >> +Marek
>> >>
>> >> Hi Albert,
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
>> >>
>> >> wro
Dear Simon Glass,
> Hi Marek,
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Simon Glass,
> >
> >> +Marek
> >>
> >> Hi Albert,
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Le 27/03/2012 22:18, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
> >> >> Hi all,
>
Hi Marek,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Simon Glass,
>
>> +Marek
>>
>> Hi Albert,
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
>>
>> wrote:
>> > Le 27/03/2012 22:18, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I have been away from the list qui
Dear Simon Glass,
> +Marek
>
> Hi Albert,
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
>
> wrote:
> > Le 27/03/2012 22:18, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >>
> >> I have been away from the list quite a few days, and will have a very
> >> tricky time catching up, so with
Hi Albert,
On 03/30/2012 09:08 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Le 27/03/2012 22:18, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have been away from the list quite a few days, and will have a very
>> tricky time catching up, so with my apologies, I ask people who need me
>> to apply patches or pull req
+Marek
Hi Albert,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Le 27/03/2012 22:18, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>> I have been away from the list quite a few days, and will have a very
>> tricky time catching up, so with my apologies, I ask people who need me
>> to
Le 27/03/2012 22:18, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
Hi all,
I have been away from the list quite a few days, and will have a very
tricky time catching up, so with my apologies, I ask people who need me
to apply patches or pull requests for the upcoming release to please
send me a private e-mail and po
Le 27/03/2012 22:18, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
Hi all,
I have been away from the list quite a few days, and will have a very
tricky time catching up, so with my apologies, I ask people who need me
to apply patches or pull requests for the upcoming release to please
send me a private e-mail and po
Hi all,
I have been away from the list quite a few days, and will have a very
tricky time catching up, so with my apologies, I ask people who need me
to apply patches or pull requests for the upcoming release to please
send me a private e-mail and point me to the list message that I should
be
Hi all,
I have been away from the list quite a few days, and will have a very
trycky time catching up, so with my apologies, I ask people who need me
to apply patches or pull requests for the upcoming release to please
send me a private e-mail and point me to the list message that I should
be
On 00:06 Mon 03 Aug , Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jean-Christophe,
>
> can you please update me on the status of the ARM repository, and
> provide some forecast when you will send a pull request?
normaly to night
Best Regards,
J.
___
U-Boot mailing
Dear Jean-Christophe,
can you please update me on the status of the ARM repository, and
provide some forecast when you will send a pull request?
The merge window was closed two weeks ago, and still I have not seen a
pull request for ARM!
Please understand this is becoming really urgent now.
If
35 matches
Mail list logo
