On 30 April 2015 at 17:09, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On 30 April 2015 at 12:16, Peter Pan 潘栋 (peterpandong)
> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> >
> >
> > I’d like to add spi nand support in u-boot. But I don’t know where
> should
> >
> > the spi nand drivers put in and how to define the architecture.
> >
> >
> >
On 5 May 2015 at 16:105, Jagan Tek
> On 4 May 2015 at 06:19, Peter Pan 潘栋 (peterpandong)
> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I’d like to add spi nand support in u-boot. But I don’t know where
> should
> > the spi nand drivers put in and how to define the architecture.
> >
> > I find that currently spi_fl
On 4 May 2015 at 06:19, Peter Pan 潘栋 (peterpandong)
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I’d like to add spi nand support in u-boot. But I don’t know where should
> the spi nand drivers put in and how to define the architecture.
>
> I find that currently spi_flash in u-boot means spi nor flash. Should I create
>
Hi All,
I’d like to add spi nand support in u-boot. But I don’t know where should
the spi nand drivers put in and how to define the architecture.
I find that currently spi_flash in u-boot means spi nor flash. Should I create
a struct spi_nand_flash or make spi_flash compatible?
Thanks
Peter Pan
Hi All,
I’d like to add spi nand support in u-boot. But I don’t know where should
the spi nand drivers put in and how to define the architecture.
I find that currently spi_flash in u-boot means spi nor flash. Should I create
a struct spi_nand_flash or make spi_flash compatible?
Thanks
Peter Pan
On 30 April 2015 at 12:16, Peter Pan 潘栋 (peterpandong)
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I’d like to add spi nand support in u-boot. But I don’t know where should
>
> the spi nand drivers put in and how to define the architecture.
>
>
>
> I find that currently spi_flash in u-boot means spi nor flash. Shoul
6 matches
Mail list logo