Dear Pink Boy,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Okay then. I was able to compile u-boot 1.3.4 for the AT91RM9200DK
with changes so that it can handle writing to the flash on my custom
board base don the AT91RM9200EK.
Great.
Seems to work but writes to flash are very slow...
You
Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The thing is: we will not accept any such (new) code for
mainline. And switching to using the CFI driver is trivial.
Okay then. I was able to compile u-boot 1.3.4 for the AT91RM9200DK
with changes so that it can handle writing to the flash on my custom
Dear Martin Hejnfelt,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
...
642D up and running, but the problem relies in the board specific
flash.c file for the DK board. The difference is the ID that the two
Why do you have to use this at all? Isn't the flash CFI conformant so
the generic CFI
Dear Martin Hejnfelt,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Why do you have to use this at all? Isn't the flash CFI conformant so
the generic CFI flash driver would work?
...
I must say, I'm still really new to U-boot so I'm not sure if I my
answer is the best method. The flash circuit
Wolfgang Denk sez,
The thing is: we will not accept any such (new) code for
mainline. And switching to using the CFI driver is trivial.
Okay so what I've learned.
1)You can build the AT91RM9200DK version of u-boot with u-boot-1.3.4
and it works. At least I got a prompt. So one can use the
I just checked the ATMEL website and it appears to me that the
AT91RM9200 is alive and well. Distributors are maintainig stock...
Why do you say that the Chip has been abandoned?
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Pink Boy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wolfgang Denk sez,
The thing is: we will not
Dear Pink Boy,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
At least I have I have some sort of peg in the ground to
start with. Right now I worry about trying to get the CFI to
work because as a noob I'm in the dark on a lot of things
If you're in the dark, you can still admire the many,
Pink Boy wrote:
Hi, first post here.
vis: Building u-boot for the AT91RM9200-EK circa 2008
Is this still possible all things considered? It appears that
this board is left behind in a backwater sometime around 2006.
Problem is I need to compile a new version of u-boot for my
new board
On 17:34 Fri 31 Oct , Pink Boy wrote:
Hi, first post here.
vis: Building u-boot for the AT91RM9200-EK circa 2008
Is this still possible all things considered? It appears that
this board is left behind in a backwater sometime around 2006.
Problem is I need to compile a new version
On 17:34 Fri 31 Oct , Pink Boy wrote:
Hi, first post here.
vis: Building u-boot for the AT91RM9200-EK circa 2008
Is this still possible all things considered? It appears that
this board is left behind in a backwater sometime around 2006.
Problem is I need to compile a new version
Jean-Christophe sez,
make distclean
make at91sam9263ek_config
Sorry bad paste job that should be
make at91rm9200ek_config.
make
CROSS_COMPILE=path_to_cross-compiler/cross-compiler-prefix-
why do you try to use the at91sam9263ek board on the
AT91RM9200EK?
and the AT91RM9200EK is
Hi, first post here.
vis: Building u-boot for the AT91RM9200-EK circa 2008
Is this still possible all things considered? It appears that
this board is left behind in a backwater sometime around 2006.
Problem is I need to compile a new version of u-boot for my
new board based
12 matches
Mail list logo
