[U-Boot] Commit 294b91a5817147d4b7f47be2ac69bac2a1f26491 broke mpc85xx

2014-09-30 Thread York Sun
Simon, I didn't notice until today the commit 294b91a5817147d4b7f47be2ac69bac2a1f26491 broke at least T4240QDS. I have narrowed down to these two lines in common/board_r.c initr_barrier, initr_malloc, If I move these two lines below this part #if defined(CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_LOCK) && de

Re: [U-Boot] Commit 294b91a5817147d4b7f47be2ac69bac2a1f26491 broke mpc85xx

2014-10-01 Thread Simon Glass
Hi York, On 30 September 2014 22:06, York Sun wrote: > Simon, > > I didn't notice until today the commit > 294b91a5817147d4b7f47be2ac69bac2a1f26491 broke at least T4240QDS. I have > narrowed down to these two lines in common/board_r.c > > initr_barrier, > initr_malloc, > > If I move thes

Re: [U-Boot] Commit 294b91a5817147d4b7f47be2ac69bac2a1f26491 broke mpc85xx

2014-10-01 Thread York Sun
On 10/01/2014 08:11 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi York, > > > On 30 September 2014 22:06, York Sun wrote: >> Simon, >> >> I didn't notice until today the commit >> 294b91a5817147d4b7f47be2ac69bac2a1f26491 broke at least T4240QDS. I have >> narrowed down to these two lines in common/board_r.c >> >>

Re: [U-Boot] Commit 294b91a5817147d4b7f47be2ac69bac2a1f26491 broke mpc85xx

2014-10-01 Thread Simon Glass
Hi York, On 1 October 2014 10:27, York Sun wrote: > On 10/01/2014 08:11 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi York, > > > > > > On 30 September 2014 22:06, York Sun wrote: > >> Simon, > >> > >> I didn't notice until today the commit > >> 294b91a5817147d4b7f47be2ac69bac2a1f26491 broke at least T4240QDS.

Re: [U-Boot] Commit 294b91a5817147d4b7f47be2ac69bac2a1f26491 broke mpc85xx

2014-10-01 Thread York Sun
On 10/01/2014 09:37 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > > Gosh. Is there something else relatively common in the PPC world that sells > for > $100-200? > Unlikely. This is high end SoC. York ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mai

Re: [U-Boot] Commit 294b91a5817147d4b7f47be2ac69bac2a1f26491 broke mpc85xx

2014-10-01 Thread Simon Glass
Hi York, On 1 October 2014 10:52, York Sun wrote: > On 10/01/2014 09:37 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >> >> Gosh. Is there something else relatively common in the PPC world that sells >> for >> $100-200? >> > > Unlikely. This is high end SoC. Well is there is some PPC board that is supported by U-Boot

Re: [U-Boot] Commit 294b91a5817147d4b7f47be2ac69bac2a1f26491 broke mpc85xx

2014-10-01 Thread York Sun
On 10/01/2014 11:01 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi York, > > On 1 October 2014 10:52, York Sun wrote: >> On 10/01/2014 09:37 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >>> >>> Gosh. Is there something else relatively common in the PPC world that sells >>> for >>> $100-200? >>> >> >> Unlikely. This is high end SoC. >

Re: [U-Boot] Commit 294b91a5817147d4b7f47be2ac69bac2a1f26491 broke mpc85xx

2014-10-01 Thread Scott Wood
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 09:27 -0700, York Sun wrote: > On 10/01/2014 08:11 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi York, > > > > > > On 30 September 2014 22:06, York Sun wrote: > >> Simon, > >> > >> I didn't notice until today the commit > >> 294b91a5817147d4b7f47be2ac69bac2a1f26491 broke at least T4240QDS.

Re: [U-Boot] Commit 294b91a5817147d4b7f47be2ac69bac2a1f26491 broke mpc85xx

2014-10-01 Thread York Sun
On 10/01/2014 07:15 PM, Scott Wood wrote: >> >> I can change init sequence as far as I put initr_unlock_ram_in_cache before >> initr_malloc, T4240QDS still boots. > > Yes, we shouldn't have any reason to keep the cache locked that long. > >> I examine the code but don't understand why I have to d