Simon,
I didn't notice until today the commit
294b91a5817147d4b7f47be2ac69bac2a1f26491 broke at least T4240QDS. I have
narrowed down to these two lines in common/board_r.c
initr_barrier,
initr_malloc,
If I move these two lines below this part
#if defined(CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_LOCK) && de
Hi York,
On 30 September 2014 22:06, York Sun wrote:
> Simon,
>
> I didn't notice until today the commit
> 294b91a5817147d4b7f47be2ac69bac2a1f26491 broke at least T4240QDS. I have
> narrowed down to these two lines in common/board_r.c
>
> initr_barrier,
> initr_malloc,
>
> If I move thes
On 10/01/2014 08:11 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi York,
>
>
> On 30 September 2014 22:06, York Sun wrote:
>> Simon,
>>
>> I didn't notice until today the commit
>> 294b91a5817147d4b7f47be2ac69bac2a1f26491 broke at least T4240QDS. I have
>> narrowed down to these two lines in common/board_r.c
>>
>>
Hi York,
On 1 October 2014 10:27, York Sun wrote:
> On 10/01/2014 08:11 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi York,
> >
> >
> > On 30 September 2014 22:06, York Sun wrote:
> >> Simon,
> >>
> >> I didn't notice until today the commit
> >> 294b91a5817147d4b7f47be2ac69bac2a1f26491 broke at least T4240QDS.
On 10/01/2014 09:37 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Gosh. Is there something else relatively common in the PPC world that sells
> for
> $100-200?
>
Unlikely. This is high end SoC.
York
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mai
Hi York,
On 1 October 2014 10:52, York Sun wrote:
> On 10/01/2014 09:37 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Gosh. Is there something else relatively common in the PPC world that sells
>> for
>> $100-200?
>>
>
> Unlikely. This is high end SoC.
Well is there is some PPC board that is supported by U-Boot
On 10/01/2014 11:01 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi York,
>
> On 1 October 2014 10:52, York Sun wrote:
>> On 10/01/2014 09:37 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>
>>> Gosh. Is there something else relatively common in the PPC world that sells
>>> for
>>> $100-200?
>>>
>>
>> Unlikely. This is high end SoC.
>
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 09:27 -0700, York Sun wrote:
> On 10/01/2014 08:11 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi York,
> >
> >
> > On 30 September 2014 22:06, York Sun wrote:
> >> Simon,
> >>
> >> I didn't notice until today the commit
> >> 294b91a5817147d4b7f47be2ac69bac2a1f26491 broke at least T4240QDS.
On 10/01/2014 07:15 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>
>> I can change init sequence as far as I put initr_unlock_ram_in_cache before
>> initr_malloc, T4240QDS still boots.
>
> Yes, we shouldn't have any reason to keep the cache locked that long.
>
>> I examine the code but don't understand why I have to d
9 matches
Mail list logo