Hi Jef,
10) The system I work on is a bareboard embedded system using U-boot
to start up. That is why we are trying to use S-record files for
uploading new programs, and not the more efficient FTP used in Linux.
So you do have a network interface on your board? Heck, why don;t you
use TFTP
On 2010-08-23, Detlev Zundel d...@denx.de wrote:
Hi Jef,
10) The system I work on is a bareboard embedded system using U-boot
to start up. That is why we are trying to use S-record files for
uploading new programs, and not the more efficient FTP used in Linux.
So you do have a network
Hi Grant,
On 2010-08-23, Detlev Zundel d...@denx.de wrote:
Hi Jef,
10) The system I work on is a bareboard embedded system using U-boot
to start up. That is why we are trying to use S-record files for
uploading new programs, and not the more efficient FTP used in Linux.
So you do have a
On 2010-08-23, Detlev Zundel d...@denx.de wrote:
I didn't say that. I was trying to say that our bareboard system
doesn't support Ethernet and does not have TCP/IP stack (like Linux).
If our system was a Linux system, we wouldn't be having this
conversation.
We use tftp in U-Boot exactly
Hi Grant,
On 8/23/2010 2:10 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2010-08-23, Detlev Zundeld...@denx.de wrote:
I didn't say that. I was trying to say that our bareboard system
doesn't support Ethernet and does not have TCP/IP stack (like Linux).
If our system was a Linux system, we wouldn't be
Hi Grant,
Maybe you can implement a server on your hardware?
What sort of server?
It would be a tftp server of course but that is out of the question
without a network hardware.
Now that you mention it, I have implemented a tftp server for U-Boot.
Nice job!
We needed a way to recover
On 2010-08-23, Ben Warren biggerbadder...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/23/2010 2:10 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
Now that you mention it, I have implemented a tftp server for U-Boot.
We needed a way to recover bricked units in the field, and there's
simply no way we could require out customers to
On 2010-08-23, Detlev Zundel d...@denx.de wrote:
Hi Grant,
Maybe you can implement a server on your hardware?
What sort of server?
It would be a tftp server of course but that is out of the question
without a network hardware.
Now that you mention it, I have implemented a tftp server for
On 2010/08/19 7:28 PM, Jef Mangelschots wrote:
Ok, here is a summary of what I have found out so, with the help of
Wolfgang. Many thanks.
4) I can not get this to work on our system (our U-boot is configured
for 115200 baud). The following explanation is based on my
observation. I might be
Dear Jef Mangelschots,
In message aanlkti=7zupgn3es_zqe6qrwc+akb4s=jnklnvsss...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
4) I can not get this to work on our system (our U-boot is configured
for 115200 baud). The following explanation is based on my
observation. I might be wrong and please correct me if I
It is not exactly _parsing_ the record, but storing the decoded data
to it's final destination, which usually includes flash programming
cycles.
Whenever some code takes a ASCII string (in my case an S-record),
extracts fields from it, converts these to numeric values, then I call
that
Dear Jef Mangelschots,
In message aanlktinlu+njp-s1bwj+zocasdptwfeqr020jw2wt...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
It is not exactly _parsing_ the record, but storing the decoded data
to it's final destination, which usually includes flash programming
cycles.
Whenever some code takes a ASCII
Dear Jef Mangelschots,
In message aanlktinlu+njp-s1bwj+zocasdptwfeqr020jw2wt...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
...
I am aware that you have suggested in many places AGAINST the use of
S-record, but there is a genuine use for it.
BTW - there are UUCP versions for Windows out there, too. You might
13 matches
Mail list logo
