Re: [U-Boot] IXP425 TEXT_BASE

2009-08-05 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear "Teh Kok How", In message <006c01ca157b$e574acb0$19330...@smartbridges.com> you wrote: > > I understand Wolfgang's argument but setting the TEXT_BASE to this > arbitrary high address (DRAM_end - U-boot_size(_end - _start)) does not make > sense. ... Maybe it makes little (or even no se

Re: [U-Boot] IXP425 TEXT_BASE

2009-08-04 Thread Teh Kok How
y, August 04, 2009 11:57 PM To: Darius Augulis Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [U-Boot] IXP425 TEXT_BASE Dear Darius Augulis, In message <4a784702.40...@gmail.com> you wrote: > > > No. TEXT_BASE is an absolute address. > > yes, but depends on the physical RAM base and size

Re: [U-Boot] IXP425 TEXT_BASE

2009-08-04 Thread Teh Kok How
-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [U-Boot] IXP425 TEXT_BASE Dear Darius Augulis, In message <4a784702.40...@gmail.com> you wrote: > > > No. TEXT_BASE is an absolute address. > > yes, but depends on the physical RAM base and size. Only on ARM (and other architectur

Re: [U-Boot] IXP425 TEXT_BASE

2009-08-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Darius Augulis, In message <4a784702.40...@gmail.com> you wrote: > > > No. TEXT_BASE is an absolute address. > > yes, but depends on the physical RAM base and size. Only on ARM (and other architectures that copied it's broken implementation). TEXT_BASE is an absolute address (in the boot fl

Re: [U-Boot] IXP425 TEXT_BASE

2009-08-04 Thread Darius Augulis
On 08/04/2009 04:49 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Darius Augulis, > > In message<4a78342c.5090...@gmail.com> you wrote: >> usually TEXT_BASE is offset, which size depends on your requirements for > > No. TEXT_BASE is an absolute address. yes, but depends on the physical RAM base and size. > >>

Re: [U-Boot] IXP425 TEXT_BASE

2009-08-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Darius Augulis, In message <4a78342c.5090...@gmail.com> you wrote: > > usually TEXT_BASE is offset, which size depends on your requirements for No. TEXT_BASE is an absolute address. > stack size and memory size for malloc. If your DRAM base is 0x0 and > TEXT_BASE is 0xf8, you will hav

Re: [U-Boot] IXP425 TEXT_BASE

2009-08-04 Thread Darius Augulis
On 08/04/2009 02:59 PM, Teh Kok How wrote: > Hi; > > I am trying to bring up u-boot-2009-08-rc1 on IXP425 board. May > I know what's the reason that the TEXT_BASE is 0x00f8 instead of 0 or > 0x5000? > > Thanks. > Hi Teh, usually TEXT_BASE is offset, which size de

[U-Boot] IXP425 TEXT_BASE

2009-08-04 Thread Teh Kok How
Hi; I am trying to bring up u-boot-2009-08-rc1 on IXP425 board. May I know what's the reason that the TEXT_BASE is 0x00f8 instead of 0 or 0x5000? Thanks. Regards, KH ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http