Hello ksi,
k...@koi8.net wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
>
>> Dear k...@koi8.net,
>>
>> In message you wrote:
>>
[...]
>>> It was _NOT_ a discussion. It ceased to be one after a couple of days. You
>>> guys somehow got scared by innocent CPP tricks and then discussion
Hello ksi,
k...@koi8.net wrote:
[...]
> Eh, I did offer such a model for I2C :) And that model can be extended to
> anything else. That is what I'm actually implementing for my new board. But
> that goes into $(BOARD)/* because I simply don't have time for pushing it
> into the U-Boot proper. I wa
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear k...@koi8.net,
>
> In message you wrote:
> >
> > That's true but... It is not that unusual to have several similar interfaces
> > on a board. There is nothing obscure or weird in that. But allowing for only
> > one of those interfaces (whichever
Dear k...@koi8.net,
In message you wrote:
>
> That's true but... It is not that unusual to have several similar interfaces
> on a board. There is nothing obscure or weird in that. But allowing for only
> one of those interfaces (whichever one chooses) supported by a given binary
> is what is wei
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear k...@koi8.net,
>
> In message you wrote:
> >
> > It is supposed to be a "Universal" bootloader. Here is what wiki says:
>
> There is a certain difference between "universal" and "omnipotent".
> Note that it's called "U-Boot", not "O-Boot".
That
Dear k...@koi8.net,
In message you wrote:
>
> It is supposed to be a "Universal" bootloader. Here is what wiki says:
There is a certain difference between "universal" and "omnipotent".
Note that it's called "U-Boot", not "O-Boot".
> === Cut ===
> Das U-Boot (Universal Bootloader, short for "Da
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Detlev Zundel wrote:
> Hello ksi (so I'll leave it at that),
>
> > First of all, there are several bootable devices on a motherboard itself.
> > These days almost every motherboard has PATA and some kind of SATA RAID
> > controller onboard. Then, it can usually boot off of US
Hello ksi (so I'll leave it at that),
> First of all, there are several bootable devices on a motherboard itself.
> These days almost every motherboard has PATA and some kind of SATA RAID
> controller onboard. Then, it can usually boot off of USB while having USB
> keyboard/mouse. As for add-on de
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Detlev Zundel wrote:
> Hi ksi (was it Sergei?),
>
> >> The fundamental concept of u-boot isn't to handle all your devices, it is
> >> to
> >> boot linux (or other OS) and use the OS to handle the multiple devices.
> >
> > The same is true for a PC BIOS, but it DOES handle al
Hi ksi (was it Sergei?),
>> The fundamental concept of u-boot isn't to handle all your devices, it is to
>> boot linux (or other OS) and use the OS to handle the multiple devices.
>
> The same is true for a PC BIOS, but it DOES handle all of my devices. And it
> allows me to choose which device to
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> k...@koi8.net wrote:
> > Hi, everyone.
> >
> > I wonder if I'm dreaming or the U-Boot is fundamentally broken...
>
> Well... broken can be a relative term. I like to think of it as an
> opportunity to stand on the shoulders of giants. ;-)
:)
> >
k...@koi8.net wrote:
> Hi, everyone.
>
> I wonder if I'm dreaming or the U-Boot is fundamentally broken...
Well... broken can be a relative term. I like to think of it as an
opportunity to stand on the shoulders of giants. ;-)
> It looks like there is no support for multiple devices of a same
Hi, everyone.
I wonder if I'm dreaming or the U-Boot is fundamentally broken...
It looks like there is no support for multiple devices of a same kind at
all.
I'm porting U-Boot to my new MPC8548-based board and it pops up
everywhere...
The first case was I2C subsystem that does not provide for
13 matches
Mail list logo
