Hi Ben,
Ben Warren wrote:
Hi Michal,
Michal Simek wrote:
Hi Stefan,
Stefan Roese wrote:
Hi Michal,
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 09:02:14 Michal Simek wrote:
I saw you have phy lib in your branch. What is the current state?
Are there any problems? When do you want to add to
Hi Ben,
I saw you have phy lib in your branch. What is the current state?
Are there any problems? When do you want to add to mainline?
Thanks,
Michal
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel 2.6 Microblaze Linux - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Hi Michal,
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 09:02:14 Michal Simek wrote:
I saw you have phy lib in your branch. What is the current state?
Are there any problems? When do you want to add to mainline?
IIRC, Jean-Christophe is also working on a PHY lib implementation (port from
the Linux version).
Hi Stefan,
Stefan Roese wrote:
Hi Michal,
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 09:02:14 Michal Simek wrote:
I saw you have phy lib in your branch. What is the current state?
Are there any problems? When do you want to add to mainline?
IIRC, Jean-Christophe is also working on a PHY lib
On 09:08 Tue 25 Aug , Stefan Roese wrote:
Hi Michal,
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 09:02:14 Michal Simek wrote:
I saw you have phy lib in your branch. What is the current state?
Are there any problems? When do you want to add to mainline?
IIRC, Jean-Christophe is also working on a PHY
Hi Michal,
Michal Simek wrote:
Hi Stefan,
Stefan Roese wrote:
Hi Michal,
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 09:02:14 Michal Simek wrote:
I saw you have phy lib in your branch. What is the current state?
Are there any problems? When do you want to add to mainline?
IIRC,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Ben Warren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Michal,
Michal Simek wrote:
Hi Ben,
how does look like your propose work about PHY lib?
Thanks,
Michal
I'd like to have the PHY library included in the 02.2009 release. One
of the things I'm struggling with is
Hi Ben,
how does look like your propose work about PHY lib?
Thanks,
Michal
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Hi Michal,
Michal Simek wrote:
Hi Ben,
how does look like your propose work about PHY lib?
Thanks,
Michal
I'd like to have the PHY library included in the 02.2009 release. One
of the things I'm struggling with is how so specify MDIO busses and PHY
addresses. For example, is it
Dear Ben,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I'd like to have the PHY library included in the 02.2009 release. One
v2009.02, that is :-)
If we pulled all board info from a device tree, as people were talking
about a few months ago, this would be easy and scalable. I don't know
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Ben,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I'd like to have the PHY library included in the 02.2009 release. One
v2009.02, that is :-)
If we pulled all board info from a device tree, as people were talking
about a few months ago, this would be easy and
Dear Wolfgang,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
BTW - Wolfgang: do you still plan to rebase post your Configure
U-Boot with a Device Tree patches? They must have grown out of sync
terribly?
Well, not really. The patch providing access to the FDT is quite simple,
making use
12 matches
Mail list logo