Re: [U-Boot] Pull request - arm/zynq

2013-11-24 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Michal, On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 09:28:16 +0100, Michal Simek mon...@monstr.eu wrote: Hi Albert, please pull these two patches to your arm next branch. It depends on zynq: Use arch_cpu_init() instead of lowlevel_init() (sha1: 262f08d6ea18a62f827b8ccb60f355ca2eaf6e2b) patch which you have in

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request - arm/zynq

2013-11-07 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Michal, On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 09:28:16 +0100, Michal Simek mon...@monstr.eu wrote: Hi Albert, please pull these two patches to your arm next branch. It depends on zynq: Use arch_cpu_init() instead of lowlevel_init() (sha1: 262f08d6ea18a62f827b8ccb60f355ca2eaf6e2b) patch which you have in

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request - arm/zynq

2013-11-07 Thread Michal Simek
Hi Albert, On 11/07/2013 10:50 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Hi Michal, On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 09:28:16 +0100, Michal Simek mon...@monstr.eu wrote: Hi Albert, please pull these two patches to your arm next branch. It depends on zynq: Use arch_cpu_init() instead of lowlevel_init() (sha1:

[U-Boot] Pull request - arm/zynq

2013-11-06 Thread Michal Simek
Hi Albert, please pull these two patches to your arm next branch. It depends on zynq: Use arch_cpu_init() instead of lowlevel_init() (sha1: 262f08d6ea18a62f827b8ccb60f355ca2eaf6e2b) patch which you have in your branch that's why I have rebased them on the top. Thanks, Michal The following

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request - arm/zynq v3

2013-09-04 Thread Michal Simek
On 09/03/2013 02:12 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Hi Michal, On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 09:36:33 +0200, Michal Simek mon...@monstr.eu wrote: Hi Albert, please pull these 3 zynq patches to your arm tree. I have rebased the tree on the 2013.07 to remove that new nds32 patches. There is still

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request - arm/zynq v3

2013-09-03 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Michal, On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 09:36:33 +0200, Michal Simek mon...@monstr.eu wrote: Hi Albert, please pull these 3 zynq patches to your arm tree. I have rebased the tree on the 2013.07 to remove that new nds32 patches. There is still pending the arm: lds: Remove libgcc eabi exception

[U-Boot] Pull request - arm/zynq v3

2013-08-19 Thread Michal Simek
Hi Albert, please pull these 3 zynq patches to your arm tree. I have rebased the tree on the 2013.07 to remove that new nds32 patches. There is still pending the arm: lds: Remove libgcc eabi exception handling tables patch. Have you considered to also add it? v3: - Rebase on the v2013.07

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request - arm/zynq v2

2013-08-18 Thread Tom Rini
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 05:42:22PM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Hi Michal, On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 09:05:00 +0200, Michal Simek mon...@monstr.eu wrote: Hi Albert, please pull these 3 zynq patches to your arm tree. There is still pending the arm: lds: Remove libgcc eabi exception

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request - arm/zynq v2

2013-08-17 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Michal, On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 09:05:00 +0200, Michal Simek mon...@monstr.eu wrote: Hi Albert, please pull these 3 zynq patches to your arm tree. There is still pending the arm: lds: Remove libgcc eabi exception handling tables patch. Have you considered to also add it? v2: -

[U-Boot] Pull request - arm/zynq

2013-08-12 Thread Michal Simek
Hi Albert, please pull these 3 zynq patches to your arm tree. There is still pending the arm: lds: Remove libgcc eabi exception handling tables patch. Have you considered to also add it? Thanks. Michal The following changes since commit c85c7faf476a3f77389f71d898ced6a326a8c691: nds32: fix

[U-Boot] Pull request - arm/zynq v2

2013-08-12 Thread Michal Simek
Hi Albert, please pull these 3 zynq patches to your arm tree. There is still pending the arm: lds: Remove libgcc eabi exception handling tables patch. Have you considered to also add it? v2: - Changed email address, - There was incorrect rebase which I have fixed - correct sha1 now Thanks.