Hi Matthias,
Stefan Roese schrieb:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On Wednesday 27 October 2010 08:55:42 Matthias Dunda wrote:
>> unfortunately I have to push this message, as I received no comment on it,
>> yet.
>>
>> Is there a reason why the immap_t is not implemented for mpc85xx?
>>
>> I tried to copy it
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:55:42 +0200
Matthias Dunda wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> unfortunately I have to push this message, as I received no comment on it,
> yet.
>
> Is there a reason why the immap_t is not implemented for mpc85xx?
immap_t gets to be a mess of ifdefs when you're trying to support a
Hi Matthias,
On Wednesday 27 October 2010 08:55:42 Matthias Dunda wrote:
> unfortunately I have to push this message, as I received no comment on it,
> yet.
>
> Is there a reason why the immap_t is not implemented for mpc85xx?
>
> I tried to copy it from mpc8360 but there are so many dependent m
Dear Matthias Dunda,
In message <6a334922-e6ee-4dc3-ae44-f43157006...@t1817.greatnet.de> you wrote:
>
> unfortunately I have to push this message, as I received no comment on it,
> yet.
See http://catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#id586288
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software
Hi again,
unfortunately I have to push this message, as I received no comment on it, yet.
Is there a reason why the immap_t is not implemented for mpc85xx?
I tried to copy it from mpc8360 but there are so many dependent mpc83xx
datatypes in that struct that I postponed the work on that, becaus
Hi all,
I've been trying to setup SPI on our MPC85xx based board.
Unfortunately, compilation of mpc8xxx_spi.c fails due to a missing immap_t
datatype.
I see, that this datatype is defined in the headers immap_83xx.h and
immap_86xx.h but it is not in immap_85xx.h.
I am using u-boot-2009.11.1 b
6 matches
Mail list logo