On Feb 7, 2013, at 5:22 PM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
It's fine until you get a bad block in the partition, and you end up
accessing the first block of the next partition (or getting Attempt to
read/write outside the flash area if it's the last partition).
Of course,
Eh, I shouldn't post code that quickly… Try this:
diff --git a/common/cmd_nand.c b/common/cmd_nand.c
--- a/common/cmd_nand.c
+++ b/common/cmd_nand.c
@@ -621,60 +621,80 @@ int do_nand(cmd_tbl_t * cmdtp, int flag,
nand = nand_info[dev];
s = strchr(cmd, '.');
On 02/08/2013 10:44:30 AM, Harvey Chapman wrote:
Eh, I shouldn't post code that quickly… Try this:
diff --git a/common/cmd_nand.c b/common/cmd_nand.c
--- a/common/cmd_nand.c
+++ b/common/cmd_nand.c
@@ -621,60 +621,80 @@ int do_nand(cmd_tbl_t * cmdtp, int flag,
nand =
On Feb 8, 2013, at 6:34 PM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On 02/08/2013 10:44:30 AM, Harvey Chapman wrote:
This should go inside the not raw path of the previous if statement.
Please use tabs to indent.
We already have nand in this context.
We already have size -- and you don't
On 02/07/2013 04:13:55 PM, Harvey Chapman wrote:
[ I started this conversation off-list before I joined the list. ]
The idea is to add .part as a valid command suffix to nand read/write
so it would match nand erase.part. The code to implement it makes
nand read.part act identically to nand
[ I started this conversation off-list before I joined the list. ]
The idea is to add .part as a valid command suffix to nand read/write so it
would match nand erase.part. The code to implement it makes nand read.part
act identically to nand read.
On Feb 7, 2013, at 4:59 PM, Scott Wood
6 matches
Mail list logo
