Hi Igor,
[...]
+1 to all said above, though some minor patching should be done:
u-boot $ grep -rn machine_is_ --exclude=mach-types.h *
arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ether.c:204:if (machine_is_csb337()) {
board/ti/omap1610inn/omap1610innovator.c:66:if (machine_is_omap_h2())
On 04/27/11 13:19, Michael Schwingen wrote:
Am 04/26/2011 11:38 PM, schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
So IMO, if we have mach-types in U-Boot for supporting Linux, then we
should keep using a (reasonably) up-to-date Linux machine ID list just
like we do now -- mach-types that disappear from the list
Am 04/26/2011 11:38 PM, schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
So IMO, if we have mach-types in U-Boot for supporting Linux, then we
should keep using a (reasonably) up-to-date Linux machine ID list just
like we do now -- mach-types that disappear from the list mean Linux
support has become useless for that
Hi Reinhard,
[...]
why don't we just create the #define MACH_xxx lines directly from the
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/download.php;. We don't
need all the *_is_* macros in u-boot anyway. Then we would have just a few
1000
lines of #define MACH_*
... and we could update
Am 04/21/2011 01:39 PM, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
Le 20/04/2011 21:26, Michael Schwingen a écrit :
year, right? Do ACTUX* and DVLHOST boards fit in this description?
Yes. The ACTUX board ports are by me, while the DVLHOST machine type
seems to be allocated by the manufacturer, Devolo, who never
Dear Michael Schwingen,
In message 4db70b98.6040...@discworld.dascon.de you wrote:
Nevertheless, we need a method so that we no not need to patch the
mach-types.h after every cacle where the Linux version is pulled in.
Detlev Zundel suggested we might maintain a U-Boot local file
Le 26/04/2011 21:40, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
Dear Michael Schwingen,
In message4db70b98.6040...@discworld.dascon.de you wrote:
Nevertheless, we need a method so that we no not need to patch the
mach-types.h after every cacle where the Linux version is pulled in.
Detlev Zundel suggested we
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message 4db72d4a.5070...@aribaud.net you wrote:
Well, as you stated yourself recently, why would/should we maintain
mach-types that are apparently not going to be used? Do machine types
have other uses than for Linux? No code in U-Boot should worry about the
On 26.04.2011 23:32, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message4db72d4a.5070...@aribaud.net you wrote:
Well, as you stated yourself recently, why would/should we maintain
mach-types that are apparently not going to be used? Do machine types
have other uses than for Linux? No code
Le 20/04/2011 21:26, Michael Schwingen a écrit :
On 04/20/2011 07:49 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 20/04/2011 19:15, Michael Schwingen a écrit :
Why don't we pull the original master mach-types file, and generate the
required .h file(s) during make using the same (or a similar) script
Linux
Hi Michael,
[...]
I did that and got the following reply (without quotes due to cut-and-paste)
[...]
The normal URL which you fetch the file from (as contained within the
file) will give you the full listing rather than the cut-down version.
There really is no need for uboot to go picking
Le 19/04/2011 15:45, Paulraj, Sandeep a écrit :
Hello Sandeep, Wolfgang
Am 19.04.2011 14:42, schrieb Paulraj, Sandeep:
Wolfgang, Albert,
Russell King sent some updates to the linux kernel for mach-types.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-
Hi Sandeep, Albert, Wolfgang,
On 04/19/11 15:42, Paulraj, Sandeep wrote:
Wolfgang, Albert,
Russell King sent some updates to the linux kernel for mach-types.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=6f82f4db80189281a8ac42f2e72396accb719b57
He also
On 04/20/2011 10:58 AM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
Hi Sandeep, Albert, Wolfgang,
On 04/19/11 15:42, Paulraj, Sandeep wrote:
Wolfgang, Albert,
Russell King sent some updates to the linux kernel for mach-types.
Le 20/04/2011 19:15, Michael Schwingen a écrit :
Why don't we pull the original master mach-types file, and generate the
required .h file(s) during make using the same (or a similar) script
Linux uses?
Hmm, because it would mean maintaining the same script as Linux uses.
With the current
On 04/20/2011 07:49 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 20/04/2011 19:15, Michael Schwingen a écrit :
Why don't we pull the original master mach-types file, and generate the
required .h file(s) during make using the same (or a similar) script
Linux uses?
Hmm, because it would mean maintaining the
Wolfgang, Albert,
Russell King sent some updates to the linux kernel for mach-types.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=6f82f4db80189281a8ac42f2e72396accb719b57
He also removed a lot of entries which never made it to mainline.
I have a patch and it
Hello Sandeep, Wolfgang
Am 19.04.2011 14:42, schrieb Paulraj, Sandeep:
Wolfgang, Albert,
Russell King sent some updates to the linux kernel for mach-types.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=6f82f4db80189281a8ac42f2e72396accb719b57
He also
Hello Sandeep, Wolfgang
Am 19.04.2011 14:42, schrieb Paulraj, Sandeep:
Wolfgang, Albert,
Russell King sent some updates to the linux kernel for mach-types.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-
2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=6f82f4db80189281a8ac42f2e72396accb719b57
Dear =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Matthias_Wei=DFer?=,
In message 4dad90af.2080...@arcor.de you wrote:
This will break a least jadecpu. We don't use Linux on this board. When
porting I was requested to reserve an MACH_ID just in case the board
will ever be used with Linux. This has not been the case for
Hello Wolfgang
Am 19.04.2011 16:21, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
Dear =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Matthias_Wei=DFer?=,
solution for ARM but non-Linux u-boot ports then? What should be passed
to gd-bd-bi_arch_number?
I think you have two options:
1) Complain with RMK about the removal of yoru MACH_ID.
...@discworld.dascon.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Update and Cut down mach types - ACTUX* and
DVLHOST
machines
removed
What makes it into the kernel is determined by a script which is
based
22 matches
Mail list logo
