My board has a problem with this change. I added it manually to my tree
and
now it wont boot at all(only with BDI2000 connected).
It seems like my board uses the warm start vector at all times.
Padding with 4 nop's after the _start symbol fixes the problem.
It might be due to a somewhat peculiar r
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 12:07 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> My board has a problem with this change. I added it manually to my tree
> and
> now it wont boot at all(only with BDI2000 connected).
Just to clarify, it won't boot with or without the BDI2000 connected,
correct?
> It seems like my boa
Peter Tyser wrote on 2010/10/19 17:51:11:
>
> On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 12:07 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > My board has a problem with this change. I added it manually to my
tree
> > and
> > now it wont boot at all(only with BDI2000 connected).
>
> Just to clarify, it won't boot with or with
> > > It seems like my board uses the warm start vector at all times.
> > > Padding with 4 nop's after the _start symbol fixes the problem.
> > > It might be due to a somewhat peculiar reset design but I cannot
> > > understand
> > > why. Does this work for everyone else using 83xx?
> >
> > Odd..
Peter Tyser wrote on 2010/10/19 20:39:41:
>
> > > > It seems like my board uses the warm start vector at all times.
> > > > Padding with 4 nop's after the _start symbol fixes the problem.
> > > > It might be due to a somewhat peculiar reset design but I cannot
> > > > understand
> > > > why. Doe
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
you
wrote:
>
> > During normal use I thought that the reset entry point was always
> > 0xX100 and a warm reset would never occur.
>
> I am not so sure about this. Perhaps the Freescale guys can set us
> straight?
Originally U-Boot (well, PPCBoot, to be m
Wolfgang Denk wrote on 2010/10/19 22:04:17:
>
> Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
>
> In message 006aa...@transmode.se> you wrote:
> >
> > > During normal use I thought that the reset entry point was always
> > > 0xX100 and a warm reset would never occur.
> >
> > I am not so sure about this. Perhaps
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
you
wrote:
>
> There is one thing though: At address 0x100(and 0x110) we have a
> branch to where the boot is really located. This is because
> we have small sectors in the beginning of the flash and we want to
> use those as environment etc.
Why don't you use
Wolfgang Denk wrote on 2010/10/19 23:13:59:
>
> Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
>
> In message 0073e...@transmode.se> you wrote:
> >
> > There is one thing though: At address 0x100(and 0x110) we have a
> > branch to where the boot is really located. This is because
> > we have small sectors in the begin
9 matches
Mail list logo
