Re: [U-Boot] efi_loader: efi_runtime_detach()?

2019-05-29 Thread Alexander Graf
On 24.05.19 09:17, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 07:27:11AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: On 5/22/19 5:15 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: Alex, It seems to me that the current efi_runtime_detach() has two meanings: * changes relating to the transition to virtual address mode *

Re: [U-Boot] efi_loader: efi_runtime_detach()?

2019-05-24 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 07:27:11AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > On 5/22/19 5:15 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > Alex, > > > > It seems to me that the current efi_runtime_detach() has > > two meanings: > > * changes relating to the transition to virtual address mode > > * changes relating to e

Re: [U-Boot] efi_loader: efi_runtime_detach()?

2019-05-23 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
On 5/22/19 5:15 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > Alex, > > It seems to me that the current efi_runtime_detach() has > two meanings: > * changes relating to the transition to virtual address mode > * changes relating to exiting boot services > > In the current implementation, efi_runtime_detach() is > c

[U-Boot] efi_loader: efi_runtime_detach()?

2019-05-21 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
Alex, It seems to me that the current efi_runtime_detach() has two meanings: * changes relating to the transition to virtual address mode * changes relating to exiting boot services In the current implementation, efi_runtime_detach() is called from efi_set_virtual_address_map() as those two purpo