> About the 2.6.35 cpufreq bug you see: I remember to see a patch for
> it. Let me locate it and I will point it to you.
If there's anything you can remember, please throw it at me: Anything
is useful.
> Or simply try to disable cpufreq if you need a quick workaround for 2.6.35.
I'll try that ne
>> I've Kernel 3.2.1 and it works. So I've made a clean-built of my 3.1.6 and
>> works
>> too. No idea why it failed before, but I'm going to disregard that for now.
>> I think
>> it's safe to conclude that the problem is an incompatibility between the
>> FreeScale supplied 2.6.35.3-571 Kernel an
Hi Robert,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>>
>> Unfortunately we cannot step up to another Kernel because we need the
>> FreeScale power supply driver for our battery and that's not yet supported in
>> later Kernel versions.
>
> However, the logical approach is to port the
> On 13/01/2012 13:56, Robert Deliën wrote:
> >> Looks like CPUfreq+usb is doing something eerie ... Fabio, can you look
> >> into it?
> >
> > I've Kernel 3.2.1 and it works. So I've made a clean-built of my 3.1.6
> > and works too. No idea why it failed before, but I'm going to disregard
> > that
On 13/01/2012 13:56, Robert Deliën wrote:
>> Looks like CPUfreq+usb is doing something eerie ... Fabio, can you look into
>> it?
>
> I've Kernel 3.2.1 and it works. So I've made a clean-built of my 3.1.6 and
> works
> too. No idea why it failed before, but I'm going to disregard that for now. I
> Looks like CPUfreq+usb is doing something eerie ... Fabio, can you look into
> it?
I've Kernel 3.2.1 and it works. So I've made a clean-built of my 3.1.6 and works
too. No idea why it failed before, but I'm going to disregard that for now. I
think
it's safe to conclude that the problem is an i
> Hi Stephan,
>
> > Of course you can post patches ! Any fix is always high appreciated !
>
> I figured patches on a different repo were a bit 'unusual', but I'll clean
> up my work and submit my patch soon.
>
> > Exactly which kernel version ? Do you tried with mainline kernel ? The
> > board i
Hi Stephan,
> Of course you can post patches ! Any fix is always high appreciated !
I figured patches on a different repo were a bit 'unusual', but I'll clean up
my work and
submit my patch soon.
> Exactly which kernel version ? Do you tried with mainline kernel ? The
> board is officially supp
On 12/01/2012 23:07, Robert Deliën wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
Hi Robert,
> Can I post a patch for your u-boot-imx tree with my integration of extra
> subsystems for the mx28evk board, or should I wait until your work on
> mx28evk_config is in the mainline?
Of course you can post patches ! Any fix is
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Robert Deliën wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> Can I post a patch for your u-boot-imx tree with my integration of extra
> subsystems for the mx28evk board, or should I wait until your work on
> mx28evk_config is in the mainline?
I think it is OK if you post patches agains
Hi Stefano,
Can I post a patch for your u-boot-imx tree with my integration of extra
subsystems for the mx28evk board, or should I wait until your work on
mx28evk_config is in the mainline?
By the way, I have the stranges issue with both your mx28evk_config,
Marek's m28evk_config and my combined
11 matches
Mail list logo
