Re: [U-Boot] simple buildman usage (was: Re: [ANN] U-Boot v2015.07 released)

2015-07-15 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On 14 July 2015 at 17:33, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 04:39:01PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > > On 07/14/2015 04:09 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > >On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 02:11:25PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > > >>On 07/14/2015 11:56 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > > >>>Hey all, > >

Re: [U-Boot] simple buildman usage (was: Re: [ANN] U-Boot v2015.07 released)

2015-07-14 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 04:39:01PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 07/14/2015 04:09 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 02:11:25PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > >>On 07/14/2015 11:56 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > >>>Hey all, > >>> > >>>I've pushed v2015.07 out to the repository and tarballs s

Re: [U-Boot] simple buildman usage (was: Re: [ANN] U-Boot v2015.07 released)

2015-07-14 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Stephen, On 14 July 2015 at 16:39, Stephen Warren wrote: > > On 07/14/2015 04:09 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 02:11:25PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> >>> On 07/14/2015 11:56 AM, Tom Rini wrote: Hey all, I've pushed v2015.07 out to the repository and

[U-Boot] simple buildman usage (was: Re: [ANN] U-Boot v2015.07 released)

2015-07-14 Thread Stephen Warren
On 07/14/2015 04:09 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 02:11:25PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: On 07/14/2015 11:56 AM, Tom Rini wrote: Hey all, I've pushed v2015.07 out to the repository and tarballs should exist soon. This sounds a bit like a broken record, but it's true. The Kconf