Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 June 2009 14:33:00 Scott Wood wrote:
>> I agree that there should be a way for the generic functions
>> to not be compiled if they're not needed.
>
> if gc-sections is used, then it isnt a problem ...
Not without some other changes -- there would still be ref
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 14:33:00 Scott Wood wrote:
> I agree that there should be a way for the generic functions
> to not be compiled if they're not needed.
if gc-sections is used, then it isnt a problem ...
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 07:52:19PM +0800, liu.yao...@zte.com.cn wrote:
> i am porting uboot to our board.and i am a fresh man to the uboot.
> after several days on studying uboot.i found uboot's mtd drvier framework
> for nand is very foolish!
As Wolfgang pointed out, patches that actually improv
Dear liu.yao...@zte.com.cn,
In message <200906111737.n5bhbllo059...@mse1.zte.com.cn> you wrote:
>
> i am porting uboot to our board.and i am a fresh man to the uboot.
> after several days on studying uboot.i found uboot's mtd drvier framework
> for nand is very foolish!
You are welcome to provid
i am porting uboot to our board.and i am a fresh man to the uboot.
after several days on studying uboot.i found uboot's mtd drvier framework
for nand is very foolish!
i think uboot should just have some api,such as
read/write_page,oob,crc,but let them be null functions.
!!!because!!! the semicon
5 matches
Mail list logo
