Re: [U-Boot] u-boot-ti next updated

2009-10-12 Thread Nishanth Menon
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Dirk Behme wrote: > Steve Sakoman wrote: >> >> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Steve Sakoman wrote: >> >>> Compile and run test of the Overo build was fine with Tobi card. >>> Later today I will try some of the other daughter cards to make sure >>> it works with

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot-ti next updated

2009-10-12 Thread Dirk Behme
Steve Sakoman wrote: > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Steve Sakoman wrote: > >> Compile and run test of the Overo build was fine with Tobi card. >> Later today I will try some of the other daughter cards to make sure >> it works with all of them. > > Heh, I spoke too soon! > > U-boot appeared

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot-ti next updated

2009-10-11 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
> > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Steve Sakoman wrote: > > > Compile and run test of the Overo build was fine with Tobi card. > > Later today I will try some of the other daughter cards to make sure > > it works with all of them. > > Heh, I spoke too soon! > > U-boot appeared to run fine,

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot-ti next updated

2009-10-11 Thread Tom Rix
Steve Sakoman wrote: > On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: >> All, >> >> I've updated the u-boot-ti next tree with quite a few patches. >> There are instances were multiple patches modify the same file. >> Can the OMAP 3 boards be tested to see if things are ok? > > Compile

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot-ti next updated

2009-10-11 Thread Steve Sakoman
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Steve Sakoman wrote: > Compile and run test of the Overo build was fine with Tobi card. > Later today I will try some of the other daughter cards to make sure > it works with all of them. Heh, I spoke too soon! U-boot appeared to run fine, but it fails in it's m

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot-ti next updated

2009-10-11 Thread Steve Sakoman
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: > All, > > I've updated the u-boot-ti next tree with quite a few patches. > There are instances were multiple patches modify the same file. > Can the OMAP 3 boards be tested to see if things are ok? Compile and run test of the Overo build

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot-ti next updated

2009-10-11 Thread Dirk Behme
Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: > All, > > I've updated the u-boot-ti next tree with quite a few patches. > There are instances were multiple patches modify the same file. > Can the OMAP 3 boards be tested to see if things are ok? Compile test of u-boot-ti/next (head c27339b41e49cd89c2ea802a490b175ac7ad

[U-Boot] u-boot-ti next updated

2009-10-10 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
All, I've updated the u-boot-ti next tree with quite a few patches. There are instances were multiple patches modify the same file. Can the OMAP 3 boards be tested to see if things are ok? It will be nice to have this info before I send Tom a pull request some time next week. This pull request w