Re: [U-Boot] why is the compilation of cmd_pcmcia.c hardcoded?

2009-12-07 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear "Robert P. J. Day", In message you wrote: > > i'm curious as to why common/Makefile hardcodes the compilation of > cmd_pcmcia.c thusly: Historic / hysteric reasons? Please feel free to submit cleanup patches! Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wol

Re: [U-Boot] why is the compilation of cmd_pcmcia.c hardcoded?

2009-11-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 18 November 2009 03:17:21 Robert P. J. Day wrote: > i'm curious as to why common/Makefile hardcodes the compilation of > cmd_pcmcia.c thusly: > > COBJS-y += cmd_pcmcia.o > > since i'm interested in building for a beagleboard, i have no interest > in PCMCIA support, yet that sourc

Re: [U-Boot] why is the compilation of cmd_pcmcia.c hardcoded?

2009-11-18 Thread Ben Warren
Robert, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > i'm curious as to why common/Makefile hardcodes the compilation of > cmd_pcmcia.c thusly: > > COBJS-y += cmd_pcmcia.o > > since i'm interested in building for a beagleboard, i have no interest > in PCMCIA support, yet that source file will be compiled for me,

[U-Boot] why is the compilation of cmd_pcmcia.c hardcoded?

2009-11-18 Thread Robert P. J. Day
i'm curious as to why common/Makefile hardcodes the compilation of cmd_pcmcia.c thusly: COBJS-y += cmd_pcmcia.o since i'm interested in building for a beagleboard, i have no interest in PCMCIA support, yet that source file will be compiled for me, even though the selection macro CONFIG_CMD_P