Re: [lwip-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/5] LWIP stack integration

2023-06-11 Thread Tom Rini
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 09:24:14AM +0100, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 10:47, Ilias Apalodimas > wrote: > > > > Hi Maxim, > > > > On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 17:33, Maxim Uvarov wrote: > > > > > > Greetings, > > > > > > I implemented the tftp client (that was quick due to lwip ha

Re: [lwip-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/5] LWIP stack integration

2023-06-11 Thread Simon Glass
Hi, On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 10:47, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > > Hi Maxim, > > On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 17:33, Maxim Uvarov wrote: > > > > Greetings, > > > > I implemented the tftp client (that was quick due to lwip has example app > > for tftp), and did some more measurements. > > I uploaded patches

Re: [lwip-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/5] LWIP stack integration

2023-06-09 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 6:56 PM Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > > Thanks Maxim, > > On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 at 13:14, Maxim Uvarov wrote: > > > > Ilias asked to make more clear results to compare the original stack and > > LWIP stack. So the difference between the current U-boot stack and the LWIP > > stac

Re: [lwip-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/5] LWIP stack integration

2023-06-08 Thread Ilias Apalodimas
Thanks Maxim, On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 at 13:14, Maxim Uvarov wrote: > > Ilias asked to make more clear results to compare the original stack and LWIP > stack. So the difference between the current U-boot stack and the LWIP stack > with 3 network commands is: > a) 18Kb - ls -lh size > b) 15Kb - bloa

Re: [lwip-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/5] LWIP stack integration

2023-06-08 Thread Maxim Uvarov
Ilias asked to make more clear results to compare the original stack and LWIP stack. So the difference between the current U-boot stack and the LWIP stack with 3 network commands is: a) 18Kb - ls -lh size b) 15Kb - bloat-o-meter script total line report. BOM=linux/scripts/bloat-o-meter (script)

Re: [lwip-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/5] LWIP stack integration

2023-06-07 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 10:18:13PM +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote: > Hi Maxim, Tom, > > On 24.05.2023 16:05, Maxim Uvarov wrote: > > On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 03:23, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 12:40:49PM -0400, Maxim Uvarov wrote: > > > > On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 10:20, Tom Rin

Re: [lwip-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/5] LWIP stack integration

2023-06-07 Thread Maxim Uvarov
On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 15:47, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > Hi Maxim, > > On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 17:33, Maxim Uvarov wrote: > > > > Greetings, > > > > I implemented the tftp client (that was quick due to lwip has example > app for tftp), and did some more measurements. > > I uploaded patches here if s

Re: [lwip-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/5] LWIP stack integration

2023-06-07 Thread Ilias Apalodimas
Hi Maxim, On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 17:33, Maxim Uvarov wrote: > > Greetings, > > I implemented the tftp client (that was quick due to lwip has example app for > tftp), and did some more measurements. > I uploaded patches here if somebody want to do his own measurements: > https://github.com/muvarov

Re: [lwip-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/5] LWIP stack integration

2023-06-06 Thread Maxim Uvarov
Greetings, I implemented the tftp client (that was quick due to lwip has example app for tftp), and did some more measurements. I uploaded patches here if somebody want to do his own measurements: https://github.com/muvarov/uboot-lwip measure 1: 976K - total (total means lwip with all 3 commands

Re: [lwip-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/5] LWIP stack integration

2023-05-24 Thread Simon Goldschmidt
Hi Maxim, Tom, On 24.05.2023 16:05, Maxim Uvarov wrote: On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 03:23, Tom Rini wrote: On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 12:40:49PM -0400, Maxim Uvarov wrote: On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 10:20, Tom Rini wrote: On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 04:33:57PM +0300, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: Hi Maxim On