On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 09:07:35PM +0300, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 04:47:53PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
>
> [...]
>
> > > My approach in this RFC:
> > >
> > > Due to functional differences in semantics, it would be
On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 04:47:53PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
>
> On 10/4/21 05:44, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > # Resending the RFC as some of patches were deplicately submitted.
> > # See also
> >https://git.linaro.org/people/takahiro.akashi/u-boot.git efi/dm_disk
> >
> > The
Hi Takahiro,
On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 at 21:44, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>
> # Resending the RFC as some of patches were deplicately submitted.
> # See also
> https://git.linaro.org/people/takahiro.akashi/u-boot.git efi/dm_disk
>
> The purpose of this RPC is to reignite the discussion about how UEFI
>
On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 04:47:53PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
>
> >
[...]
> > My approach in this RFC:
> >
> > Due to functional differences in semantics, it would be difficult
> > to identify "udevice" structure as a handle in UEFI world. Instead, we will
>
On 10/4/21 05:44, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
# Resending the RFC as some of patches were deplicately submitted.
# See also
https://git.linaro.org/people/takahiro.akashi/u-boot.git efi/dm_disk
The purpose of this RPC is to reignite the discussion about how UEFI
subystem would best be
# Resending the RFC as some of patches were deplicately submitted.
# See also
https://git.linaro.org/people/takahiro.akashi/u-boot.git efi/dm_disk
The purpose of this RPC is to reignite the discussion about how UEFI
subystem would best be integrated into U-Boot device model.
In the past, I
6 matches
Mail list logo