On 31/05/2022 17:15, Andrew Davis wrote:
> On 5/31/22 12:06 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> On 27/05/2022 20:50, Alper Nebi Yasak wrote:
>>> This would definitely work, see etype/mkimage.py for example. I'd prefer
>>> to know the file-format details (and maybe replicate them in binman) if
>>> you
On 5/31/22 12:06 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
Hi,
On 27/05/2022 20:50, Alper Nebi Yasak wrote:
On 26/05/2022 17:15, Tom Rini wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 10:28:45AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
Any thoughts on how to get the new ti-secure etype work with atf-bl31 and
tee-os etypes so that it
Hi,
On 27/05/2022 20:50, Alper Nebi Yasak wrote:
> On 26/05/2022 17:15, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 10:28:45AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>> Any thoughts on how to get the new ti-secure etype work with atf-bl31 and
>>> tee-os etypes so that it can take the data output of those
On 26/05/2022 17:15, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 10:28:45AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Any thoughts on how to get the new ti-secure etype work with atf-bl31 and
>> tee-os etypes so that it can take the data output of those entries and create
>> a signed binary with filenames from
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 10:28:45AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> On 25/05/2022 18:14, Andrew Davis wrote:
> > On 5/25/22 3:30 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >> Hi Andrew,
> >>
> >> On 25/05/2022 01:03, Andrew Davis wrote:
> >>> On 5/9/22 2:29 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Introduce
On 25/05/2022 18:14, Andrew Davis wrote:
> On 5/25/22 3:30 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> On 25/05/2022 01:03, Andrew Davis wrote:
>>> On 5/9/22 2:29 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
Introduce k3-am642-evm-binman.dtsi to provide binman configuration.
R5 build is still not
On 5/25/22 3:30 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On 25/05/2022 01:03, Andrew Davis wrote:
On 5/9/22 2:29 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
Introduce k3-am642-evm-binman.dtsi to provide binman configuration.
R5 build is still not converted to use binman so restrict binman.dtsi
to A53 builds only.
Hi Andrew,
On 25/05/2022 01:03, Andrew Davis wrote:
> On 5/9/22 2:29 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Introduce k3-am642-evm-binman.dtsi to provide binman configuration.
>>
>> R5 build is still not converted to use binman so restrict binman.dtsi
>> to A53 builds only.
>>
>> This patch also take care
On 5/9/22 2:29 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
Introduce k3-am642-evm-binman.dtsi to provide binman configuration.
R5 build is still not converted to use binman so restrict binman.dtsi
to A53 builds only.
This patch also take care of building Secure (HS) images using
binman instead of
Introduce k3-am642-evm-binman.dtsi to provide binman configuration.
R5 build is still not converted to use binman so restrict binman.dtsi
to A53 builds only.
This patch also take care of building Secure (HS) images using
binman instead of tools/k3_fit_atf.sh if CONFIG_BINMAN is set.
10 matches
Mail list logo