On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 02:39:49PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 at 11:07, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 11:02:06AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 at 10:28, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 23, 20
Hi Tom,
On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 at 11:07, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 11:02:06AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 at 10:28, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:13:52AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > > > BTW buildma
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 11:02:06AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 at 10:28, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:13:52AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> > > BTW buildman supports -L which disabled LTO using the NO_LTO=1 option
> >
> > I worry
Hi Tom,
On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 at 10:28, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:13:52AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > BTW buildman supports -L which disabled LTO using the NO_LTO=1 option
>
> I worry about putting sandbox-specific flags in buildman. Outside of
> sandbox, targets
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:13:52AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
[snip]
> BTW buildman supports -L which disabled LTO using the NO_LTO=1 option
I worry about putting sandbox-specific flags in buildman. Outside of
sandbox, targets that enable LTO require LTO, just like any other CONFIG
option.
--
T
Hi Tom,
On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 at 06:37, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 12:05:34AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Sat, 21 Oct 2023 at 11:34, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 08:43:00AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 14:53,
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 12:05:34AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2023 at 11:34, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 08:43:00AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 14:53, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The primary motivation for having a sa
Hi Tom,
On Sat, 21 Oct 2023 at 11:34, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 08:43:00AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 14:53, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > The primary motivation for having a sandbox without LTO build in CI is
> > > to ensure that we don't have that opti
On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 08:43:00AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 14:53, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > The primary motivation for having a sandbox without LTO build in CI is
> > to ensure that we don't have that option break. We now have the ability
> > to run tests of specific optio
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 14:53, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> The primary motivation for having a sandbox without LTO build in CI is
> to ensure that we don't have that option break. We now have the ability
> to run tests of specific options being enabled/disabled, so drop the
> parts of CI that build and tes
The primary motivation for having a sandbox without LTO build in CI is
to ensure that we don't have that option break. We now have the ability
to run tests of specific options being enabled/disabled, so drop the
parts of CI that build and test that configuration specifically and add
a build test in
11 matches
Mail list logo