On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 10:50:57AM +, Sebastian Veit wrote:
> Dear devs of U-Boot,
>
> I'd like to know if there's already a work in progress
> on the support of the "fairly new" Boot Loader Specification [1].
No, as I don't think anyone here had heard of that project until now.
Hopefully if
> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 10:50:57 +
> From: Sebastian Veit
>
> Dear devs of U-Boot,
>
> I'd like to know if there's already a work in progress
> on the support of the "fairly new" Boot Loader Specification [1].
>
> Summary of the new spec: Defines a set of file formats and
> naming conventi
On 11/16/22 11:50, Sebastian Veit wrote:
Dear devs of U-Boot,
I'd like to know if there's already a work in progress
on the support of the "fairly new" Boot Loader Specification [1].
Summary of the new spec: Defines a set of file formats and
naming conventions to allow distribution independent
+Tom
Hi Sebastian,
On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 at 05:08, Sebastian Veit
wrote:
>
> Dear devs of U-Boot,
>
> I'd like to know if there's already a work in progress
> on the support of the "fairly new" Boot Loader Specification [1].
>
> Summary of the new spec: Defines a set of file formats and
> naming c
Dear devs of U-Boot,
I'd like to know if there's already a work in progress
on the support of the "fairly new" Boot Loader Specification [1].
Summary of the new spec: Defines a set of file formats and
naming conventions to allow distribution independent
boot loader menus supportable by multiple b
5 matches
Mail list logo