Hello Simon,
The EBBR specification requires that the UEFI SystemReset() runtime
service is available to the operating system.
Up to now this has been implemented by overriding function
efi_reset_system() which is marked as __efi_runtime.
Both ARM and RISC-V support generic interfaces for reset
Hi Heinrich,
On Thu, 9 Sept 2021 at 05:29, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
> Hello Simon,
>
> The EBBR specification requires that the UEFI SystemReset() runtime
> service is available to the operating system.
>
> Up to now this has been implemented by overriding function
> efi_reset_system() which
On 9/9/21 10:00 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Heinrich,
On Thu, 9 Sept 2021 at 05:29, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
Hello Simon,
The EBBR specification requires that the UEFI SystemReset() runtime
service is available to the operating system.
Up to now this has been implemented by overriding fu
Hi Heinrich,
On Fri, 10 Sept 2021 at 08:19, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/9/21 10:00 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Heinrich,
> >
> > On Thu, 9 Sept 2021 at 05:29, Heinrich Schuchardt
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello Simon,
> >>
> >> The EBBR specification requires that the UEFI SystemReset(
Hi Heinrich,
On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 7:16 PM Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
> Hello Simon,
>
> The EBBR specification requires that the UEFI SystemReset() runtime
> service is available to the operating system.
>
> Up to now this has been implemented by overriding function
> efi_reset_system() which
Le jeu. 30 sept. 2021 à 07:12, Bin Meng a écrit :
> Hi Heinrich,
>
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 7:16 PM Heinrich Schuchardt
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Simon,
> >
> > The EBBR specification requires that the UEFI SystemReset() runtime
> > service is available to the operating system.
> >
> > Up to now th
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 2:23 PM François Ozog
wrote:
>
>
> Le jeu. 30 sept. 2021 à 07:12, Bin Meng a écrit :
>
>> Hi Heinrich,
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 7:16 PM Heinrich Schuchardt
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello Simon,
>> >
>> > The EBBR specification requires that the UEFI SystemReset() runtime
Le jeu. 30 sept. 2021 à 08:38, Bin Meng a écrit :
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 2:23 PM François Ozog
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Le jeu. 30 sept. 2021 à 07:12, Bin Meng a écrit :
>>
>>> Hi Heinrich,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 7:16 PM Heinrich Schuchardt
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hello Simon,
>>> >
>>> >
On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 09:38, Bin Meng wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 2:23 PM François Ozog
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Le jeu. 30 sept. 2021 à 07:12, Bin Meng a écrit :
>>>
>>> Hi Heinrich,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 7:16 PM Heinrich Schuchardt
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hello Simon,
>>> >
>>>
On 9/30/21 8:23 AM, François Ozog wrote:
Le jeu. 30 sept. 2021 à 07:12, Bin Meng mailto:bmeng...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
Hi Heinrich,
On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 7:16 PM Heinrich Schuchardt
mailto:xypron.g...@gmx.de>> wrote:
>
> Hello Simon,
>
> The EBBR specificat
Am 2021-09-30 08:56, schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt:
On 9/30/21 8:23 AM, François Ozog wrote:
[..]
Is U-Boot's UEFI loader implementation supposed to be the
recommended
UEFI firmware on ARM and RISC-V on a production / deployment
system?
For Arm: yes, that is SystemReady spec.
For RIS
Am 30. September 2021 11:53:47 MESZ schrieb Michael Walle :
>Am 2021-09-30 08:56, schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt:
>> On 9/30/21 8:23 AM, François Ozog wrote:
>[..]
>>> Is U-Boot's UEFI loader implementation supposed to be the
>>> recommended
>>> UEFI firmware on ARM and RISC-V on a production
> From: Simon Glass
> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 22:08:49 -0600
Hi Simon,
> Hi Heinrich,
>
> On Fri, 10 Sept 2021 at 08:19, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 9/9/21 10:00 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Heinrich,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 9 Sept 2021 at 05:29, Heinrich Schuchardt
> > > wro
> From: François Ozog
> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 08:23:34 +0200
>
> Le jeu. 30 sept. 2021 à 07:12, Bin Meng a écrit :
>
> > Hi Heinrich,
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 7:16 PM Heinrich Schuchardt
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Simon,
> > >
> > > The EBBR specification requires that the UEFI System
> From: Ilias Apalodimas
> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 09:46:30 +0300
>
> On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 09:38, Bin Meng wrote:
>
> > Does any board that ships EDK II with UEFI + DTB?
>
> The Socionext SynQuacer box is the only board I know off, that works
> with EDK2 and can use either DT or ACPI.
The S
On 9/30/21 13:13, Mark Kettenis wrote:
From: Simon Glass
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 22:08:49 -0600
Hi Simon,
Hi Heinrich,
On Fri, 10 Sept 2021 at 08:19, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 9/9/21 10:00 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Heinrich,
On Thu, 9 Sept 2021 at 05:29, Heinrich Schuchardt wr
On 9/30/21 13:31, Mark Kettenis wrote:
From: François Ozog
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 08:23:34 +0200
Le jeu. 30 sept. 2021 à 07:12, Bin Meng a écrit :
Hi Heinrich,
On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 7:16 PM Heinrich Schuchardt
wrote:
Hello Simon,
The EBBR specification requires that the UEFI SystemR
Am 2021-09-30 12:50, schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt:
Am 30. September 2021 11:53:47 MESZ schrieb Michael Walle
:
Am 2021-09-30 08:56, schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt:
On 9/30/21 8:23 AM, François Ozog wrote:
[..]
Is U-Boot's UEFI loader implementation supposed to be the
recommended
UEFI firm
On 9/30/21 14:07, Michael Walle wrote:
Am 2021-09-30 12:50, schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt:
Am 30. September 2021 11:53:47 MESZ schrieb Michael Walle
:
Am 2021-09-30 08:56, schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt:
On 9/30/21 8:23 AM, François Ozog wrote:
[..]
Is U-Boot's UEFI loader implementation s
On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 14:07, Michael Walle wrote:
> Am 2021-09-30 12:50, schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt:
> > Am 30. September 2021 11:53:47 MESZ schrieb Michael Walle
> > :
> >> Am 2021-09-30 08:56, schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt:
> >>> On 9/30/21 8:23 AM, François Ozog wrote:
> >> [..]
> Is
[adding Vladimir, because he showed interest in this, too]
Am 2021-09-30 15:56, schrieb François Ozog:
On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 14:07, Michael Walle wrote:
Am 2021-09-30 12:50, schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt:
Am 30. September 2021 11:53:47 MESZ schrieb Michael Walle
:
Am 2021-09-30 08:56, schri
On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 17:12, Michael Walle wrote:
> [adding Vladimir, because he showed interest in this, too]
>
> Am 2021-09-30 15:56, schrieb François Ozog:
> > On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 14:07, Michael Walle wrote:
> >
> >> Am 2021-09-30 12:50, schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt:
> >>> Am 30. Septemb
Am 2021-09-30 17:47, schrieb François Ozog:
On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 17:12, Michael Walle wrote:
[adding Vladimir, because he showed interest in this, too]
Am 2021-09-30 15:56, schrieb François Ozog:
On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 14:07, Michael Walle
wrote:
Am 2021-09-30 12:50, schrieb Heinric
On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 18:25, Michael Walle wrote:
> Am 2021-09-30 17:47, schrieb François Ozog:
> > On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 17:12, Michael Walle wrote:
> >
> >> [adding Vladimir, because he showed interest in this, too]
> >>
> >> Am 2021-09-30 15:56, schrieb François Ozog:
> >>> On Thu, 30 Sep
With SystemReady, DT from distros are ignored.
Err? Is this really true, I know about some incompatible changes
to the device tree which prevents you from using usb (or even a
kernel panic) with the imx8mm and I know that on the ls1028a
flexspi wont work if the devicetree doesn't match the kerne
Le ven. 1 oct. 2021 à 00:00, Michael Walle a écrit :
> > With SystemReady, DT from distros are ignored.
>
> Err? Is this really true, I know about some incompatible changes
> to the device tree which prevents you from using usb (or even a
> kernel panic) with the imx8mm an
Am 2021-10-01 00:20, schrieb François Ozog:
Le ven. 1 oct. 2021 à 00:00, Michael Walle a
écrit :
With SystemReady, DT from distros are ignored.
Err? Is this really true, I know about some incompatible
changes
to the device tree which prevents you from using usb (or even a
kernel panic) wit
27 matches
Mail list logo