Re: Error handling broken for block devices

On 1/20/20 9:40 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that block device commands like "ls" fail to give any error > messages in some cases. For example, something like > > -> ls FOOBAR 1:1 / > -> > > will terminate without the slightest hint that FOOBAR is some device > type

Error handling broken for block devices

Hi, I noticed that block device commands like "ls" fail to give any error messages in some cases. For example, something like -> ls FOOBAR 1:1 / -> will terminate without the slightest hint that FOOBAR is some device type it does not know. Following the call chain I see this: