On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 3:35 AM Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
wrote:
> um, weirdthe patch indicates imx6 in the name. this should be enough no?
imx6 is too generic. Which imx6? imx6sx, imx6sl, imx6solo, imx6dl,
imx6qp, imx6q, imx6ul, imx6ull, imx6ulz?
It is OK to keep mx6 in the Subject th
On 22/10/20, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 6:24 PM Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
> wrote:
>
> > um, weird, I just googled "imx Rev 2, 10/2019, ERR007805" and it showed
> > the document and a link to the errata.
>
> The errata document is specific for a SoC.
perfect. now you un
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 6:24 PM Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
wrote:
> um, weird, I just googled "imx Rev 2, 10/2019, ERR007805" and it showed
> the document and a link to the errata.
The errata document is specific for a SoC.
It does not help to add "Rev 2, 10/2019, ERR007805" in the commit l
On 22/10/20, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 11:23 AM Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz
> wrote:
> >
> > In order to be able to run the I2C bus at 400Khz, the chip errata[1]
> > recommends that the peripheral clock runs out of the 24MHz oscillator.
>
> I would suggest adding the optee related m
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 11:23 AM Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
>
> In order to be able to run the I2C bus at 400Khz, the chip errata[1]
> recommends that the peripheral clock runs out of the 24MHz oscillator.
I would suggest adding the optee related motivation that you explained
earlier here in the
On 19/10/20, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
> In order to be able to run the I2C bus at 400Khz, the chip errata[1]
> recommends that the peripheral clock runs out of the 24MHz oscillator.
>
> [1] Rev 2, 10/2019, ERR007805
>
> Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-imx/mx6/soc.c |
On 19/10/20, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries wrote:
> On 19/10/20, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > Hi Jorge,
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 10:07 AM Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > In order to be able to run the I2C bus at 400Khz, the chip errata[1]
> > > recommends that the peripheral clock
On 19/10/20, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Jorge,
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 10:07 AM Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz
> wrote:
> >
> > In order to be able to run the I2C bus at 400Khz, the chip errata[1]
> > recommends that the peripheral clock runs out of the 24MHz oscillator.
> >
> > [1] Rev 2, 10/2019, ERR0
Hi Jorge,
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 10:07 AM Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
>
> In order to be able to run the I2C bus at 400Khz, the chip errata[1]
> recommends that the peripheral clock runs out of the 24MHz oscillator.
>
> [1] Rev 2, 10/2019, ERR007805
>
> Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz
> ---
>
> Subject: [PATCH] mx6: peripheral clock from oscillator
>
> In order to be able to run the I2C bus at 400Khz, the chip errata[1]
> recommends that the peripheral clock runs out of the 24MHz oscillator.
>
> [1] Rev 2, 10/2019, ERR007805
>
> Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz
> ---
> arch/arm/m
any thoughts?
On 14/10/20, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
> In order to be able to run the I2C bus at 400Khz, the chip errata[1]
> recommends that the peripheral clock runs out of the 24MHz oscillator.
>
> [1] Rev 2, 10/2019, ERR007805
>
> Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz
> ---
> arch/arm/mach
11 matches
Mail list logo