Re: [PATCH 0/3] Conformance Profiles Table support in U-boot

2021-12-23 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
On 12/23/21 16:20, Jose Marinho wrote: Hi Heinrich, The change suggested in https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3591 is a not well designed: How could the missing of a table ever be taken as a sign of compliance? Below is my interpretation of intent behind the ECPT changes: The UE

RE: [PATCH 0/3] Conformance Profiles Table support in U-boot

2021-12-23 Thread Jose Marinho
Hi Heinrich, > > The change suggested in > https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3591 > is a not well designed: How could the missing of a table ever be taken as a > sign of compliance? > Below is my interpretation of intent behind the ECPT changes: The UEFI spec specifies a set of requ

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Conformance Profiles Table support in U-boot

2021-12-17 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
On 12/17/21 13:55, Jose Marinho wrote: The Conformance Profiles Table (ECPT) table will be included in the UEFI specification 2.9+. The change suggested in https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3591 is a not well designed: How could the missing of a table ever be taken as a sign of com