Re: [PATCH v4] usb: xhci: fix lack of short packet event trb handling

2020-12-16 Thread Marek Vasut
On 12/16/20 4:02 AM, Bin Meng wrote: Hi [...] This patch adds a loop to make sure the event TRB for last transfer TRB has been handled in time. Applied, thanks. I see in patchwork this was assigned to me and I don't see this patch got its way to mainline. Let me know if I need to apply

Re: [PATCH v4] usb: xhci: fix lack of short packet event trb handling

2020-12-15 Thread Bin Meng
Hi Marek, On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 6:52 AM Marek Vasut wrote: > > On 11/18/20 8:49 AM, Ran Wang wrote: > > For bulk IN transfer, the codes will set ISP flag to request event TRB > > being generated by xHC for the case of short packet. So when encountering > > buffer-cross-64K-boundary (which we

Re: [PATCH v4] usb: xhci: fix lack of short packet event trb handling

2020-12-02 Thread Marek Vasut
On 11/18/20 8:49 AM, Ran Wang wrote: For bulk IN transfer, the codes will set ISP flag to request event TRB being generated by xHC for the case of short packet. So when encountering buffer-cross-64K-boundary (which we will divide payload and enqueuqe more than 1 transfer TRB), and the first TRB

Re: [PATCH v4] usb: xhci: fix lack of short packet event trb handling

2020-11-29 Thread Bin Meng
Hi Ran, On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 9:42 AM Ran Wang wrote: > > Hi Marek, Bin, > > > On Wednesday, November 18, 2020 3:49 PM, Ran Wang wrote: > > > > For bulk IN transfer, the codes will set ISP flag to request event TRB being > > generated by xHC for the case of short packet. So when encountering >

RE: [PATCH v4] usb: xhci: fix lack of short packet event trb handling

2020-11-29 Thread Ran Wang
Hi Marek, Bin, On Wednesday, November 18, 2020 3:49 PM, Ran Wang wrote: > > For bulk IN transfer, the codes will set ISP flag to request event TRB being > generated by xHC for the case of short packet. So when encountering > buffer-cross-64K-boundary (which we will divide payload and enqueuqe