RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Device Tree Overlays and FIT Images - Are they supported together fully?

2022-02-28 Thread Westermann, Oliver
Hey Marcel, > On Sat, 2022-02-19 at 00:38 +, Ziswiler, Marcel wrote: > I am not sure whether I fully understand the issue(s) you are having. Same here ;-) I did some more work on this, best described as copying a lot of commands from my notepad back and forth. I think you confirmed my

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Device Tree Overlays and FIT Images - Are they supported together fully?

2022-02-18 Thread Marcel Ziswiler
Hi Olli On Fri, 2022-02-11 at 08:13 +, Westermann, Oliver wrote: [snip] > My current setup uses bootm ${loadaddr}#${fit_config} which works fine, > fit_config containing a configuration > node name. When calling bootm ${loadaddr}#${fit_config}#bar to apply the bar > overlay to

RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Device Tree Overlays and FIT Images - Are they supported together fully?

2022-02-11 Thread Westermann, Oliver
Hey, On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 at 08:54, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > You can pass the name of a configuration and overlays to apply to the > bootm command. See doc/uImage.FIT/overlay-fdt-boot.txt > > Here are examples of usage: > > * configs/am65x_hs_evm_a53_defconfig > *

Re: Device Tree Overlays and FIT Images - Are they supported together fully?

2022-02-10 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
On 2/11/22 08:19, Westermann, Oliver wrote: On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 at 10:50, Oliver Westermann wrote: Hey, Is my doubt reasonable or am I missing a step somewhere? You can pass the name of a configuration and overlays to apply to the bootm command. See doc/uImage.FIT/overlay-fdt-boot.txt Here

RE: Device Tree Overlays and FIT Images - Are they supported together fully?

2022-02-10 Thread Westermann, Oliver
On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 at 10:50, Oliver Westermann wrote: > Hey, > > Is my doubt reasonable or am I missing a step somewhere? > I can provide more info (detailed load & boot steps, fit image iminfo) if > needed. > > - Olli > Hey, I'm not sure if this is the correct list or my initial