Dear Luka Perkov,
In message <20111216234317.GB1393@w500.iskon.local> you wrote:
>
> Ok, thanks for pointing this out. I guess that something like patch
> bellow is not acceptable?
"acceptable" is somethign that is a bit hard to define.
Let's say, there is no real incentive to apply this patch.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 10:59:03AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 16 December 2011 07:13:47 Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:32:15 +0100 Luka Perkov wrote:
> > > Cosmetic patch for first U-Boot line that gets printed.
> > >
> > > --- a/include/version.h
> > > +++ b/in
On Friday 16 December 2011 18:43:18 Luka Perkov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 10:59:03AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Friday 16 December 2011 07:13:47 Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> > > On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:32:15 +0100 Luka Perkov wrote:
> > > > Cosmetic patch for first U-Boot line that ge
On Friday 16 December 2011 07:13:47 Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:32:15 +0100 Luka Perkov wrote:
> > Cosmetic patch for first U-Boot line that gets printed.
> >
> > --- a/include/version.h
> > +++ b/include/version.h
> >
> > #define U_BOOT_VERSION_STRING U_BOOT_VERSION " ("
Hi Luka,
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:32:15 +0100
Luka Perkov wrote:
> Cosmetic patch for first U-Boot line that gets printed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luka Perkov
> ---
> diff --git a/include/version.h b/include/version.h
> index c908bd3..ac5a39a 100644
> --- a/include/version.h
> +++ b/include/version.h
5 matches
Mail list logo