Hi,
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>> On 12/16/2012 02:18 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Jaehoon,
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:25 AM,
Hi Simon,
It looks good to me.
Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung
On 02/09/2013 01:48 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Jaehoon Chung
>> wrote:
>>> On 12/16/2012 02:18 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
Hi all
Just replied to remind this patch.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
On 04/04/2013 03:49 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>
>> Hi Andy,
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Jaehoon Chung
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
>>> It looks good
Hi Andy,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> It looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung
Do you think this will be picked up this time around?
Regards,
Simon
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://l
Hi Andy,
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Jaehoon Chung
> wrote:
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > It looks good to me.
> >
> > Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung
>
> Do you think this will be picked up this time around?
>
ping?
Any thoughts on thi
Hi Simon,
Is it saved the 200ms? Could you tell me your environment?
I will check this patch..and share the result.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
2012/11/29 Simon Glass :
> From: Che-Liang Chiou
>
> Most of time that MMC driver spends on initializing a device is polling
> OCR (operation condition
Hi,
This concept is very good.
But I have one question. I think need to call mmc_init() one more, right?
how did you save the boot time(200ms)?
On 11/29/2012 10:21 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> From: Che-Liang Chiou
>
> Most of time that MMC driver spends on initializing a device is polling
> OCR (o
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Jae hoon Chung wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Is it saved the 200ms? Could you tell me your environment?
> I will check this patch..and share the result.
The environment is snow (Samsung ARM Chromebook). The time save only
comes from not waiting for the MMC init. So:
Hi Jaehoon,
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This concept is very good.
> But I have one question. I think need to call mmc_init() one more, right?
> how did you save the boot time(200ms)?
>
> On 11/29/2012 10:21 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> From: Che-Liang Chiou
>>
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Jaehoon,
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Jaehoon Chung
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This concept is very good.
>> But I have one question. I think need to call mmc_init() one more, right?
>> how did you save the boot time(200ms)?
>>
>>
On 12/16/2012 02:18 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Jaehoon,
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Jaehoon Chung
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This concept is very good.
>>> But I have one question. I think need to call mmc_init() one mor
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> On 12/16/2012 02:18 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Jaehoon,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Jaehoon Chung
>>> wrote:
Hi,
This concept is very goo
12 matches
Mail list logo