Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v4 2/3] common: Convert ulong to phys_addr_t for image addresses

2016-02-23 Thread Simon Glass
Hi York, On 23 February 2016 at 13:36, york sun wrote: > On 02/16/2016 08:01 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi York, >> >> On 12 February 2016 at 13:59, York Sun wrote: >>> When dealing with image addresses, ulong has been used. Some files >>> are used by both host and target. It is OK for the target

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v4 2/3] common: Convert ulong to phys_addr_t for image addresses

2016-02-23 Thread york sun
On 02/16/2016 08:01 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi York, > > On 12 February 2016 at 13:59, York Sun wrote: >> When dealing with image addresses, ulong has been used. Some files >> are used by both host and target. It is OK for the target, but not >> always enough for host tools including mkimage. Th

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v4 2/3] common: Convert ulong to phys_addr_t for image addresses

2016-02-16 Thread Simon Glass
Hi York, On 12 February 2016 at 13:59, York Sun wrote: > When dealing with image addresses, ulong has been used. Some files > are used by both host and target. It is OK for the target, but not > always enough for host tools including mkimage. This patch replaces > "ulong" with "phys_addr_t" to ma