Re: U-boot is broken with -O0?

2021-11-09 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 02:34:41PM -0500, Sean Anderson wrote: > Hi Oleh, > > On 11/9/21 2:31 PM, Oleh Kravchenko wrote: > > Hello Tom, > > for what reason it's not supported? > > > > I'm finding that very useful for debugging. > > Perhaps try -Og Yes. There are several places where we rely on

Re: U-boot is broken with -O0?

2021-11-09 Thread Sean Anderson
Hi Oleh, On 11/9/21 2:31 PM, Oleh Kravchenko wrote: Hello Tom, for what reason it's not supported? I'm finding that very useful for debugging. Perhaps try -Og --Sean Only a few issues with conditional compilation breaks it. Also this issue reproducible if -DDEBUG=1 is used. -- Best regar

Re: U-boot is broken with -O0?

2021-11-09 Thread Oleh Kravchenko
Hello Tom, for what reason it's not supported? I'm finding that very useful for debugging. Only a few issues with conditional compilation breaks it. Also this issue reproducible if -DDEBUG=1 is used. -- Best regards, Oleh Kravchenko > 9 лист. 2021 р. о 20:52 Tom Rini пише: > > On Tue, Nov 09

Re: U-boot is broken with -O0?

2021-11-09 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 08:33:33PM +0200, Oleh Kravchenko wrote: > Hello guys! > > I think the CI verification job for u-boot patches should be updated to > include CFLAGS like -O0 > Because I'm not able to build u-boot for Raspberry Pi (or to another board) > with -O0 > > Here the commands ho

U-boot is broken with -O0?

2021-11-09 Thread Oleh Kravchenko
Hello guys! I think the CI verification job for u-boot patches should be updated to include CFLAGS like -O0 Because I'm not able to build u-boot for Raspberry Pi (or to another board) with -O0 Here the commands how to quickly reprodice the problem:     export ARCH=arm64     export CROSS_COMPILE