On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 05:41:47PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Am 2020-09-22 16:41, schrieb Tom Rini:
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 03:18:58PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> [..]
> > > > But all that said, since we have "wdt stop", perhaps you can find a
> > > > place to put that in the
Hi Tom,
Am 2020-09-22 16:41, schrieb Tom Rini:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 03:18:58PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
[..]
> But all that said, since we have "wdt stop", perhaps you can find a
> place to put that in the boot script? Or just declare that if we get
> far enough to run preboot cmd then
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 03:18:58PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 2020-09-22 14:36, schrieb Tom Rini:
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 08:59:00AM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Am 2020-09-22 03:18, schrieb Tom Rini:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:56:14PM +0200, Michael
Hi,
Am 2020-09-22 14:36, schrieb Tom Rini:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 08:59:00AM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
Hi,
Am 2020-09-22 03:18, schrieb Tom Rini:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:56:14PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
[..]
> > > > >>> >> called in the bootefi case. So even if I'd
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 08:59:00AM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 2020-09-22 03:18, schrieb Tom Rini:
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:56:14PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> [..]
> > > > > >>> >> called in the bootefi case. So even if I'd do a
> > > > > >>> workaround
Hi,
Am 2020-09-22 03:18, schrieb Tom Rini:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:56:14PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
Hi,
[..]
> > >>> >> called in the bootefi case. So even if I'd do a workaround and
> > >>> stop it
> > >>> >> manually in my board code, I couldn't do that consistently for
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:56:14PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 2020-09-21 20:50, schrieb Tom Rini:
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 08:29:00PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > On 9/21/20 7:30 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:01:37AM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
>
On 9/21/20 10:56 PM, Michael Walle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 2020-09-21 20:50, schrieb Tom Rini:
>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 08:29:00PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>> On 9/21/20 7:30 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:01:37AM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
>>> >> Hi Michael,
>>> >> Hi
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 8:56 AM Michael Walle wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Am 2020-09-21 20:50, schrieb Tom Rini:
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 08:29:00PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >> On 9/21/20 7:30 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:01:37AM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> >> >> Hi
Hi,
Am 2020-09-21 20:50, schrieb Tom Rini:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 08:29:00PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 9/21/20 7:30 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:01:37AM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> On 15.09.20 12:44, Chris Packham wrote:
>>>
>>>
>
Hi Stefan,
Am 2020-09-21 11:01, schrieb Stefan Roese:
Hi Michael,
Hi Chris,
On 15.09.20 12:44, Chris Packham wrote:
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020, 7:54 PM Michael Walle, wrote:
Am 2020-09-15 09:44, schrieb Rayagonda Kokatanur:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 12:56 PM Michael Walle
> wrote
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 08:29:00PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 9/21/20 7:30 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:01:37AM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> >> Hi Michael,
> >> Hi Chris,
> >>
> >> On 15.09.20 12:44, Chris Packham wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2020, 7:54
On 9/21/20 7:30 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:01:37AM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> On 15.09.20 12:44, Chris Packham wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2020, 7:54 PM Michael Walle, wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 2020-09-15 09:44, schrieb Rayagonda Kokatanur:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:01:37AM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> Hi Chris,
>
> On 15.09.20 12:44, Chris Packham wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 15 Sep 2020, 7:54 PM Michael Walle, wrote:
> >
> > Am 2020-09-15 09:44, schrieb Rayagonda Kokatanur:
> > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 12
Hi Michael,
Hi Chris,
On 15.09.20 12:44, Chris Packham wrote:
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020, 7:54 PM Michael Walle, wrote:
Am 2020-09-15 09:44, schrieb Rayagonda Kokatanur:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 12:56 PM Michael Walle
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> it appears th
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020, 7:54 PM Michael Walle, wrote:
> Am 2020-09-15 09:44, schrieb Rayagonda Kokatanur:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 12:56 PM Michael Walle
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Stefan,
> >>
> >> it appears that since commit 06985289d45 ("watchdog: Implement generic
> >> watchdog_reset() version
Am 2020-09-15 09:44, schrieb Rayagonda Kokatanur:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 12:56 PM Michael Walle
wrote:
Hi Stefan,
it appears that since commit 06985289d45 ("watchdog: Implement generic
watchdog_reset() version") - by default - the first watchdog is
started
unconditionally if CONFIG_WDT is
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 12:56 PM Michael Walle wrote:
>
> Hi Stefan,
>
> it appears that since commit 06985289d45 ("watchdog: Implement generic
> watchdog_reset() version") - by default - the first watchdog is started
> unconditionally if CONFIG_WDT is set but never stopped before booting
> the op
Hi Stefan,
it appears that since commit 06985289d45 ("watchdog: Implement generic
watchdog_reset() version") - by default - the first watchdog is started
unconditionally if CONFIG_WDT is set but never stopped before booting
the operating system.
Shouldn't it also be stopped uncondionally? Wh
19 matches
Mail list logo
