On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 10:21 +0800, Liu Dave wrote:
> > I'd prefer if we didn't unnecessarily proliferate phy-specific
> status
> > code. Does the generic mii_parse_sr() function not work for the
> > RTL8211B? If so, this is fine. Otherwise, let's not have 10
> > different versions of the same co
Dear Kumar,
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > Actually NONE of the files in libfdt/ get compiled, because
> > CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT is not set (yet) when this gets built. Ummm, right -
> > there are no dependencies on building the OBJS, SUBDIRS or LIBS
> > targets... Seem
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> please put this into fsl_spi.h to reuse for different 8xxx family.
fsl_spi.h might be a bit too general? How about non-8xxx Freescale
processors?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
H
> I don't have access to 8313 or 8610 reference manuals. Can you please
> verify the memory map of these two for me. I've verified that 8315 is
> identical.
8313/8315/834x/8610 have same SPI.
Dave
-
Check out the new Sourc
> >
> > 8313/8315/834x/8610 have same SPI.
and 837x
> asm/immap_86xx.h doesn't have SPI registers listed in the
> memory map, so
> support for 8610 will have to wait.
>
> I've incorporated your change requests and will see if
> there's any more
> feedback on Monday before reposting the patch
Liu Dave wrote:
>> I don't have access to 8313 or 8610 reference manuals. Can you please
>> verify the memory map of these two for me. I've verified that 8315 is
>> identical.
>>
>
> 8313/8315/834x/8610 have same SPI.
>
> Dave
>
>
asm/immap_86xx.h doesn't have SPI registers listed in the
Liu Dave wrote:
>> I don't have access to 8313 or 8610 reference manuals. Can you please
>> verify the memory map of these two for me. I've verified that 8315 is
>> identical.
>>
>
> 8313/8315/834x/8610 have same SPI.
>
> Dave
>
>
Cool. Thanks.
Ben
--
On Jan 13, 2008, at 2:05 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> In message <8C3593F2-B970-42FA-A92B-
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>> It looks like the following commit has broken the build a bit:
>>>
>>> ae6d1056d2c2e4d1266413c0ae8a6d5529ecde4b - Fix Mak
Liu Dave wrote:
+typedef struct spi834x
+{
+ u8 res0[0x20]; /* 0x0-0x01f reserved */
+ u32 mode; /* mode register */
+ u32 event; /* event register */
+ u32 mask; /* mask register */
+ u32 com;/* command re
From: Poonam Aggrwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
These changes were identified by HighSmith Bill ,Mazzyar and Joseph for
DDR configuration in u-boot code. Some are related to performance, some
affect stability and some correct few basic errors in the current
configuration.
The changes have been tested
Liu Dave wrote:
+typedef struct spi834x
+{
+ u8 res0[0x20]; /* 0x0-0x01f reserved */
+ u32 mode; /* mode register */
+ u32 event; /* event register */
+ u32 mask; /* mask register */
+ u32 com;/* command re
> >> +typedef struct spi834x
> >> +{
> >> + u8 res0[0x20]; /* 0x0-0x01f reserved */
> >> + u32 mode; /* mode register */
> >> + u32 event; /* event register */
> >> + u32 mask; /* mask register */
> >> + u32 com;/* command register */
> >> +
Dave Liu wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 10:48 +0800, Ben Warren wrote:
>
>> This patch adds support for the SPI controller found on Freescale
>> PowerPC
>> processors such as the MCP834x family. Additionally, a new config
>> option,
>> CONFIG_HARD_SPI, is added for general purpose SPI controlle
On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 10:48 +0800, Ben Warren wrote:
> This patch adds support for the SPI controller found on Freescale
> PowerPC
> processors such as the MCP834x family. Additionally, a new config
> option,
> CONFIG_HARD_SPI, is added for general purpose SPI controller use.
Ben, Could you make
> qe.c: In function 'qe_upload_firmware':
> qe.c:390: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'strcpy'
> differ in signedness
> uec.c: In function 'uec_initialize':
> uec.c:1236: warning: 'uec_info' may be used uninitialized in this
> function
>
>
> Please fix. Thanks.
It's done, the
qe.c: In function 'qe_upload_firmware':
qe.c:390: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2
uec.c: In function 'uec_initialize':
uec.c:1236: warning: 'uec_info' may be used uninitialized
Signed-off-by: Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/qe/qe.c |2 +-
drivers/qe/uec.c |1 +
2
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> board/esd/du440/Makefile | 51 ++
> board/esd/du440/config.mk | 41 ++
> board/esd/du440/du440.c| 1171
>
> board/esd/du440/du440.h|
Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/esd/du440/Makefile | 51 ++
board/esd/du440/config.mk | 41 ++
board/esd/du440/du440.c| 1171
board/esd/du440/du440.h| 42 ++
board/esd/du440/init.S | 80 +++
board/esd/d
Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
MAINTAINERS |1 +
MAKEALL |1 +
Makefile|3 +
include/configs/DU440.h | 438 +++
4 files changed, 443 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mod
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > It looks like the following commit has broken the build a bit:
> >
> > ae6d1056d2c2e4d1266413c0ae8a6d5529ecde4b - Fix Makefile
> > dependencies issues; allow silent build
> >
> > make distclean ; make
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> It looks like the following commit has broken the build a bit:
>
> ae6d1056d2c2e4d1266413c0ae8a6d5529ecde4b - Fix Makefile
> dependencies issues; allow silent build
>
> make distclean ; make MPC8544DS_config ; make -j4
>
> I get:
>
> board/frees
It looks like the following commit has broken the build a bit:
ae6d1056d2c2e4d1266413c0ae8a6d5529ecde4b - Fix Makefile
dependencies issues; allow silent build
make distclean ; make MPC8544DS_config ; make -j4
I get:
board/freescale/mpc8544ds/libmpc8544ds.a(mpc8544ds.o): In function
`ft_
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/MAKEALL b/MAKEALL
>> index ebc5a22..7e39b2c 100755
>> --- a/MAKEALL
>> +++ b/MAKEALL
>> @@ -516,6 +516,10 @@ LIST_ixp=3D"\
>> ixdpg425\
>> pdnb3 \
>> scpu\
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> The following changes since commit 8d79953d03e6c5b24215609997dafe4daa623cd6:
> Stefan Roese (1):
> Merge branch 'master' of /home/stefan/git/u-boot/u-boot
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-cfi-flash
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> This patch adds the AcTux-1 specific files.
You are still not consequently indenting by TAB's.
> diff --git a/board/actux1/actux1.c b/board/actux1/actux1.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..eac85dc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/board/actux1/actux1.c
...
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> diff --git a/MAKEALL b/MAKEALL
> index ebc5a22..7e39b2c 100755
> --- a/MAKEALL
> +++ b/MAKEALL
> @@ -516,6 +516,10 @@ LIST_ixp=3D" \
> ixdpg425\
> pdnb3 \
> scpu\
> + actux1 \
> +
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Applied, thanks.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell,
The following changes since commit 8d79953d03e6c5b24215609997dafe4daa623cd6:
Stefan Roese (1):
Merge branch 'master' of /home/stefan/git/u-boot/u-boot
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-cfi-flash.git master
Michael Schwingen (1):
CFI: Fix CONFI
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Michael Schwingen wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 07:48:26PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Hm... either you got the patch inverse, or something is seriously
> > broken:
>
> I vote for the second option - don't know what got into me. The strange
> thing is that it wor
Hi Wolfgang,
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > With recent toolchain versions, some boards would not build because
> > or errors like this one (here for ocotea board when building with
> > ELDK 4.2):
> > ppc_4xx-ld: section .bootpg [f
This patch adds the AcTux-4 specific files.
Signed-off-by: Michael Schwingen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/board/actux4/Makefile b/board/actux4/Makefile
This patch adds the AcTux-3 specific files.
Signed-off-by: Michael Schwingen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/board/actux3/Makefile b/board/actux3/Makefile
This patch adds the AcTux-1 specific files.
Signed-off-by: Michael Schwingen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/board/actux1/Makefile b/board/actux1/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 000..a7e8322
--- /dev/null
+++ b/board/actux1/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+#
+# (C) Copyright 2000-2006
+# Wolfg
This patch adds the AcTux-2 specific files.
Signed-off-by: Michael Schwingen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
resend of the previous patch set with formatting fixed (hopefully).
The patch adds 4 boards, called AcTux-1 .. AcTux-4. This patch contains the
files that
contain changes for multiple boards, the board-specific files follow as
separate patches.
cu
Michael
Signed-off-by: Michael Schwingen <
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/common/cmd_nand.c b/common/cmd_nand.c
index b248a2c..8d6c959 100644
--- a/common/cmd_nand.c
+++ b/common/cmd_nand.c
@@ -350,10 +350,10 @@ int do_nand(cmd_tbl_t * cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char
*argv[])
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Dirk Behme wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, Stefan Roese wrote:
>>
>> Here comes a trivial patch to cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/nand.c.
> Unfortunately I
>> don't have hardware handy so I can not test it at the moment but
> changes
>> are
>> rather trivial
37 matches
Mail list logo
