Signed-off-by: Larry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/configs/korat.h | 234 ++--
include/configs/sequoia.h | 238 ++--
2 files changed, 237 insertions(+), 235 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/kora
There are two missing files from the distribution that prevents uboot
from compiling.
stddef.h is included by a few different things, but can be a blank
file.
stdarg.h is included by a couple of things, and can be a trivial
implementation (attached).
These are both host includes, and likely shou
Current MII_DEBUG is confusing in two ways. One is useless define-then-
undef at the top of the file. The other is there is only one debug() in
this file, and that doesn't seem worthwhile to bother having MII_DEBUG.
While there are many useful printf()/puts() debug codes, but they are for
DEBUG, no
k b wrote:
> Gerald,
> Thanks for your response.
>
> I have had a 1.1.3 running on a board for 3+ yrs now, and i might add with
> any problems.
> Now as I'm moving to a newer version of the board I'm evaluating the effort
> level vs extra features that newer version of uboot gets me.
> hence th
Gerald,
Thanks for your response.
I have had a 1.1.3 running on a board for 3+ yrs now, and i might add with any
problems.
Now as I'm moving to a newer version of the board I'm evaluating the effort
level vs extra features that newer version of uboot gets me.
hence the reason of finding out wh
Mahesh,
I am not aware of the GW2355 and if it was a custom design since Gateworks
does do custom boards. For their current "retail" offerings I had posted a
patch a few months ago:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/30313/match=avila
Hope it helps.
-Ranjit
On 1/18/08 12
Update some ARM9 builds to pass the exact CPU to GCC, when the compiler
supports that specification. This stops pessimizing codegen, and removes
voluminous warnings about (no) interworking support from EABI compilers.
(Like CodeSourcery's ARM 2007q3 release.)
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <[EMAIL
Add some missing ARM boards to MAKEALL. These build correctly,
unlike several of the boards already listed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- u-boot.orig/MAKEALL 2008-01-13 10:42:55.0 -0800
+++ u-boot/MAKEALL 2008-01-13 10:42:59.0 -0800
@@ -455,6 +455,8 @
This fixes a naming bug for at91rm9200 lowlevel init code:
NOR boot flash is on chipselect 0, not chipselect 2. This
makes code use the register name from chip datasheets.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/lowlevel_init.S |6 +++---
include/configs/
Hi,
Has anybody done the u-boot porting on Avila platforms. I have GW2355,
which is based on IXP425 CPU.
I have used the existing IXDP425 support from the u-boot, and could get
the console messages till the prompt. But the problem is I could not
write anything in the console. I could see that
k b wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a question regarding the various version of u-boot.
>
> Is there a page that you can point me to that holds like a release note or
> something that tells me what's different from the previous release.
> I tried looking http://www.denx.de/wiki/UBoot/WebHome but couldn't f
Hi,
I have a question regarding the various version of u-boot.
Is there a page that you can point me to that holds like a release note or
something that tells me what's different from the previous release.
I tried looking http://www.denx.de/wiki/UBoot/WebHome but couldn't find
anything.
here ar
On Jan 17, 2008 8:25 AM, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Move the flat device tree setup for QE related devices into
> a common file shared between 83xx & 85xx platforms that have QE's.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Andy Fleming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:09:24 -0500
> Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Dave Liu wrote:
>>
>>> The commit 04a9e1180ac76a7bacc15a6fcd95ad839d65bddb
>>> cause the 83xx immap broken, so the DMA and PCI will
>>> be failed.
>>>
>>> The patch fix the struct spi8xxx
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:09:24 -0500
Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Liu wrote:
> > The commit 04a9e1180ac76a7bacc15a6fcd95ad839d65bddb
> > cause the 83xx immap broken, so the DMA and PCI will
> > be failed.
> >
> > The patch fix the struct spi8xxx.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Liu <[EMA
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>> We should _all_ violently agree with this patch. :-)
> Thank you for explaining. It is a good lesson for me.
No problem.
>> Atarashi pachi hoshii!
> :-)
> I sent patch that fix CONFIG_COMMANDS problem yesterday.
I saw that. Thanks!
jdl
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:50:05 -0600
Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Oh, and, a "git grep CONFIG_COMMANDS" reveals that there
> >> are a few other lingering instances of this bug around.
>
> > Thank you for your comment.
> > # I have not understood "Amen-brother-by" first.
>
> Sorry.
Hello!
Tiju schrieb:
> Could
> someone
> help
> me
> out
> with
> patching
> the
> u-boot.
Do you really think this is funny?
And why don't you follow the hint given by the patch program? It
already told you what to do.
Cross-posting to several mailing lists and also to the maintainers
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 03:54:29PM +0530, Tiju wrote:
> Hi
>
> Could someone help me out with patching the u-boot.
> I downloaded the source code of u-boot-1.1.6 and untared it. Then I do a
> $cd u-boot-1.1.6
> $svn co http://svn.openmoko.org/trunk/src/target/u-boot/patches/
those patches are ag
Hi
Could
someone
help
me
out
with
patching
the
u-boot.
I
downloaded
the
source
code
of
u-boot-1.1.6
and
untared
it.
Then
I
do
a
$cd
u-boot-1.1.6
$svn
co
http://svn.openmoko.org/trunk/src/target/u-boot/patches/
$patch
http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/webmessengerpromo.php
--
Hi
Could someone help me out with patching the u-boot.
I downloaded the source code of u-boot-1.1.6 and untared it. Then I do a
$cd u-boot-1.1.6
$svn co http://svn.openmoko.org/trunk/src/target/u-boot/patches/
$patch http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/webmessengerpromo.php
---
Modify global files to include new PPC405GPr based MCU25 board
Signed-off-by: Niklaus Giger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
MAINTAINERS |1 +
MAKEALL |1 +
Makefile|3 +++
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index c2c7075..e5449d8 1
Add PPC405GPr based MCU25 board from Netstal.
Signed-off-by: Niklaus Giger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/netstal/mcu25/Makefile | 60 +++
board/netstal/mcu25/README.txt | 60 +++
board/netstal/mcu25/config.mk | 29 ++
board/netstal/mcu25/config.mk~ | 29 ++
boar
Config for Netstal PPC405GPr based MCU25 board.
Signed-off-by: Niklaus Giger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/configs/mcu25.h | 365 +++
1 files changed, 365 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/configs/mcu25.h
diff --git a/include
Signed-off-by: TsiChungLiew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/net/Makefile |1 +
drivers/net/fsl_mcdmafec.c | 571
net/eth.c |4 +
3 files changed, 576 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/net/fsl_mcdma
FYI
The list [EMAIL PROTECTED] has a thread starting:
"
I tried 2007Q3 to compile u-boot for arm926ejs, but i got the following
error "undefined reference to `raise". Is it correctable?
"
with the (probable) conclusion:
"
I don't think you need to go that far.
Uboot is a stand-alone application
Le vendredi 18 janvier 2008 à 09:45 +0100, Haavard Skinnemoen a écrit :
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:38:17 +0100
> Stelian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/macb.c b/drivers/net/macb.c
[...]
> Cool, I always was curious about whether post-rm9200 AT91 chips could
> use thi
Allow passing O=../build for the HCU4/HCU5 builds
Signed-off-by: Niklaus Giger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/netstal/hcu4/Makefile |4 ++--
board/netstal/hcu5/Makefile |4 ++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/netstal/hcu4/Makefile b/board/netstal/hcu4/
The following changes since commit f188896c2f1594fe749fdb99bbc8c54023cfab3a:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Merge branch 'master' of git+ssh://10.10.0.7/home/wd/git/u-boot/master
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-avr32.git master
Yeah, I know it's one day too l
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:38:17 +0100
Stelian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/macb.c b/drivers/net/macb.c
> index 6657d22..9c98338 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/macb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/macb.c
> @@ -417,10 +417,18 @@ static int macb_init(struct eth_device *netdev,
> bd_t *bd)
30 matches
Mail list logo
