> I see that qe_config_iopin() will always write a 0 or 1 now, ignoring the
> current value. Are you sure this is a good idea? What if I don't want U-Boot
> to change the current pin value?
Well, not sure how important this is, as this function is typically used
for port initialization. This was
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
: > There are two missing files from the distribution that prevents uboot
: > from compiling.
:
: What sort of toolchain are you using?
binutils 2.15 and gcc 4.2.1. T
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> There are two missing files from the distribution that prevents uboot
> from compiling.
What sort of toolchain are you using?
> stddef.h is included by a few different things, but can be a blank
> file.
>
> stdarg.h is included by a couple of things, a
Signed-off-by: TsiChungLiew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/asm-m68k/fec.h | 145 ++--
include/asm-m68k/fsl_mcdmafec.h | 176 +
include/asm-m68k/immap.h | 93 +++
include/asm-m68k/immap_547x_8x.h | 297 ++
include/asm-m68k/m547x_8
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:41:55 -0600
"Andy Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 17, 2008 8:25 AM, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Move the flat device tree setup for QE related devices into
> > a common file shared between 83xx & 85xx platforms that have QE's.
> >
> > Signed-off-by
On 10:56 Fri 18 Jan , Niklaus Giger wrote:
> Add PPC405GPr based MCU25 board from Netstal.
>
> Signed-off-by: Niklaus Giger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> board/netstal/mcu25/Makefile | 60 +++
> board/netstal/mcu25/README.txt | 60 +++
> board/netstal/mcu25/config.mk |
Jean-Christophe,
1. Do you want the patch against the Xscale custodian tree or the mainline ?
2. Do you want me to create a separate directory under board/ ?
Thanks,
-Ranjit
On 1/19/08 12:59 AM, "Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 13:13 Fri 18 Jan , Ranjit Des
I think we should start to use CONFIG_ to simplify the migration go
kconfig ang suggest to use CONFIG_MII_DEBUG
Best Regards,
J.
Le 19 janv. 08 à 02:25, Shinya Kuribayashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a
écrit :
> Current MII_DEBUG is confusing in two ways. One is useless define-
> then-
> undef at t
A Is For Attitude http://71.207.61.164/
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
On 13:13 Fri 18 Jan , Ranjit Deshpande wrote:
> Mahesh,
>
> I am not aware of the GW2355 and if it was a custom design since Gateworks
> does do custom boards. For their current "retail" offerings I had posted a
> patch a few months ago:
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-
On 13:13 Fri 18 Jan , Ranjit Deshpande wrote:
> Mahesh,
>
> I am not aware of the GW2355 and if it was a custom design since Gateworks
> does do custom boards. For their current "retail" offerings I had posted a
> patch a few months ago:
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-
11 matches
Mail list logo
