Re: [U-Boot-Users] Revised custodian git writeup

Hi Jerry, "gvb.uboot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I've rewritten the "Tips for maintaining custodian trees" section to > reflect Wolfgang's request that the "master" branch be used for patches > for hi

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Hi

Pooja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello I just started working with U boot and i haven't got a clue how > and what to do. How are we supposed to help you if you don't even know what you want to do? Reading the README is always a good start though. Best regards Markus Klotzbuecher -- DENX Sof

Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot version string in kernel/userspace

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > Waht's the best way to get the U-Boot version string (the one returned > > by U-Boot cmd "version") from userspace? > > Arg passed to the kernel? > > U-Boot env variables and use fw_getenv? > > U-Boot disappears when the kernel loads, so the only cr

[U-Boot-Users] Hi

Hello I just started working with U boot and i haven't got a clue how and what to do. can someone please help me out. Pooja Adiga - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 20

[U-Boot-Users] How are you doing?

You remember me? I do! Here my page: http://fiu-ik.nm.ru haqcyzdm - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___

[U-Boot-Users] Revised custodian git writeup

I've rewritten the "Tips for maintaining custodian trees" section to reflect Wolfgang's request that the "master" branch be used for patches for him to pull. Conceptually, this is very different from my prev

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch u-boot git 2/3] better ARM9 compiler options

On Monday 21 January 2008, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: > > --- u-boot.orig/cpu/arm920t/config.mk 2008-01-13 10:42:55.0 -0800 > > +++ u-boot/cpu/arm920t/config.mk 2008-01-13 11:05:02.0 -0800 > > @@ -24,11 +24,11 @@ > > PLATFORM_RELFLAGS += -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -ffixed-r8 \ > >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch u-boot git 2/3] better ARM9 compileroptions

> Is this correct? > ARM926EJ-S is ARMV5 architecture, not ARMV4. Yes, 926EJ-S is ARMv5. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse01

Re: [U-Boot-Users] How to patch u-boot?

Harald Welte wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 10:07:07AM -0500, Jerry Van Baren wrote: > >> Openmoko has not been an active participant on the u-boot list. > > Mh, please check your list archives. I see 22 postings over the last > year. Not many, but also !=- 'not been active'. Good to know,

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch u-boot git 2/3] better ARM9 compiler options

> Update some ARM9 builds to pass the exact CPU to GCC, when the compiler > supports that specification. This stops pessimizing codegen, and removes > voluminous warnings about (no) interworking support from EABI compilers. > (Like CodeSourcery's ARM 2007q3 release.) > > Signed-off-by: David Brow

Re: [U-Boot-Users] "stacked" memory mapped flash assisted with GPIOs

On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:01:48 -0500 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > that would allow board porters to select an arbitrary address and say "if you > wish to erase/write the flash in a contiguous manner, you need to use the > base address 0x rather than the real base address 0x..

Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot version string in kernel/userspace

Hi Gregoire, On Jan 21, 2008 11:21 AM, Gregoire Banderet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Waht's the best way to get the U-Boot version string (the one returned > by U-Boot cmd "version") from userspace? > Arg passed to the kernel? > U-Boot env variables and use fw_getenv? > ...? > Yeah, I'd g

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ColdFire: Added M5275EVB support.

On Jan 21, 2008 3:24 PM, Matthew Fettke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Matthew Fettke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> You have no idea how happy I am to see this patch. I was working on my own, but hadn't tried it out yet. Once this is applied, is it put right into the git tree, or does that n

Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot version string in kernel/userspace

Gregoire Banderet wrote: > Hi, > > Waht's the best way to get the U-Boot version string (the one returned > by U-Boot cmd "version") from userspace? > Arg passed to the kernel? > U-Boot env variables and use fw_getenv? U-Boot disappears when the kernel loads, so the only cross-platform option is

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ColdFire: Added M5275EVB support.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Fettke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- MAKEALL |1 + Makefile|3 + board/freescale/m5275evb/Makefile | 40 + board/freescale/m5275evb/config.mk | 25 +++ board/freescale/m5275evb/m5275evb.c | 109 +++

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ColdFire: Added MCF5275 cpu support.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Fettke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- CREDITS |1 + cpu/mcf52x2/config.mk |4 + cpu/mcf52x2/cpu.c | 70 ++ cpu/mcf52x2/cpu_init.c| 122 ++ cpu/mcf52x2/interrupts.c |4 +- cpu/mcf52x2/speed.c

Re: [U-Boot-Users] How to patch u-boot?

On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 10:07:07AM -0500, Jerry Van Baren wrote: > Openmoko has not been an active participant on the u-boot list. Mh, please check your list archives. I see 22 postings over the last year. Not many, but also !=- 'not been active'. > They took a snapshot of u-boot and then d

[U-Boot-Users] ATTN MontaVista!

Hey MontaVista U-Boot Developers! There hasn't been an 86xx U-Boot on jdl.com for nearly 6 months now. No need to continue to attempt to pull from it any more! Besides, all that content has been sent upstream and it has morphed into the custodian repository u-boot-mpc86xx.git on denx.de instead

[U-Boot-Users] U-Boot version string in kernel/userspace

Hi, Waht's the best way to get the U-Boot version string (the one returned by U-Boot cmd "version") from userspace? Arg passed to the kernel? U-Boot env variables and use fw_getenv? ...? -- Greg - This SF.net email is spons

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add *~ to .gitignore

Jon Loeliger wrote: > Niklaus Giger wrote: >> One should never add a backup file ending in with ~ to the git repository. >> >> Signed-off-by: Niklaus Giger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> --- >> .gitignore |1 + >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitign

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/3] ppc_4xx: Add MCU25 board specific failes

Ack Best Regards, J. Le 21 janv. 08 à 16:25, Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > >>> create mode 100644 board/netstal/mcu25/mcu25.c >>> create mode 100644 board/netstal/mcu25/mcu25.c~ >> backup file, >> please remove > > Hmm. Perhaps we shoul a

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add *~ to .gitignore

Niklaus Giger wrote: > One should never add a backup file ending in with ~ to the git repository. > > Signed-off-by: Niklaus Giger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > .gitignore |1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore > index cda275e..37f2c1d

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add *~ to .gitignore

One should never add a backup file ending in with ~ to the git repository. Signed-off-by: Niklaus Giger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- .gitignore |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index cda275e..37f2c1d 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitigno

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/3] ppc_4xx: Add MCU25 board specific failes

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >> create mode 100644 board/netstal/mcu25/mcu25.c >> create mode 100644 board/netstal/mcu25/mcu25.c~ > backup file, > please remove Hmm. Perhaps we shoul add *~ to the .gitignore file? jdl --

Re: [U-Boot-Users] How to patch u-boot?

Tiju wrote: > Hi [snipped unreadable original request] > Because in http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Uboot, the bootloader source > code section says..."The current bootloader patches can be found at > http://svn.openmoko.org/trunk/src/target/u-boot/patches/. Untar the > sources, apply the patch, ru

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] [ads5121] DDR2 init/timing update.

>From Chris Alger's CW bluestone config file. Signed-off-by: John Rigby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Grzegorz Bernacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- This patch was created by John Rigby. I tested it and rebased against current top of the tree. board/ads5121/ads5121.c | 36

Re: [U-Boot-Users] "stacked" memory mapped flash assisted with GPIOs

On Monday 21 January 2008, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - have memory display / flash write commands toggle the GPIO lines > > * pros: user interface is transparent and not confusing by making it > > seem like 1 flash exists (think software raid 0). ab

Re: [U-Boot-Users] "stacked" memory mapped flash assisted with GPIOs

On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 05:56:08 -0500 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - have memory display / flash write commands toggle the GPIO lines > * pros: user interface is transparent and not confusing by making it seem > like 1 flash exists (think software raid 0). able to use 1 write comman