Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch] add support for "eeprom info"

On Wednesday 23 January 2008, Ben Warren wrote: > Hey Mike, > > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Wednesday 23 January 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > >>> with eeprom_info behind CONFIG_SPI. most SPI flashes nowadays support > >>> the jedec id command which a

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch] add support for "eeprom info"

Hey Mike, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wednesday 23 January 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> >>> with eeprom_info behind CONFIG_SPI. most SPI flashes nowadays support >>> the jedec id command which allows for dynamic detection (which is how the >>

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch] add support for "eeprom info"

On Wednesday 23 January 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > with eeprom_info behind CONFIG_SPI. most SPI flashes nowadays support > > the jedec id command which allows for dynamic detection (which is how the > > Blackfin SPI driver that i wrote works). hook

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] pci: Add CONIFG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE config

In current source code, when the device number of PCI is 0, process PCI bridge without fail. However, when the device number is 0, it is not PCI always bridge. There are times when device of PCI allocates. When CONIFG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE is enable, this problem is solved when use this patch. Sig

Re: [U-Boot-Users] u-boot for Microblaze build problem

Hi, 2008/1/23, Bruce Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Where do I get the latest version of U-Boot for microblaze? You can get lastest version from u-boot or u-boot-microblaze Git repositry. > Where do I get the latest version of mb-gcc (Microblaze gcc compiler)? > Where is the best documenta

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix remaining CONFIG_COMMANDS

2008/1/24, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > update comments > Fix coding style > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > diff --git a/include/configs/ms7720se.h b/include/configs/ms7720se.h > index 8a94c28..537afe0 100644 > --- a/include/con

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch] add support for "eeprom info"

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > the semantics are irrelevant. it's an external non-volatile memory device > accessed via the eeprom command. the document you posted looks like that > device doesnt have any way of querying it, so eeprom_info() for that device Indeed. There is no

Re: [U-Boot-Users] RFC: Concise Build Output

Dear Jon, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > In the spirit of the Linux and Git build systems, > I have a modified U-Boot build system that supports > a much more concise output! One of the primary > motivations for this style of output is that it > will very readily highlight build i

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ColdFire: Added M5275EVB support.

Thanks for your responses, guys. I've tried both of your methods, and both give me similar errors. In the m5275evb patch, everything works except MAKEALL and Makefile. In the mcf5275 patch, there are a lot more errors. I should note that I couldn't find the exact commit TsiChung mentions... the

Re: [U-Boot-Users] M5282EVB compilation errors

Liew Tsi Chung ha scritto: > Marco, > >> I have again errors. >> Which u-boot and m68k-uclinux version are you using ? > >> start.S: Assembler messages: >> start.S:171: Error: operands mismatch -- statement `movec > %d0,%RAMBAR0' > > Can you edit the start.S @ 171 and rename from 0 to 1? That

Re: [U-Boot-Users] M5282EVB compilation errors

Marco, > I have again errors. > Which u-boot and m68k-uclinux version are you using ? > start.S: Assembler messages: > start.S:171: Error: operands mismatch -- statement `movec %d0,%RAMBAR0' Can you edit the start.S @ 171 and rename from 0 to 1? That should take care the error. Regards, TsiCh

Re: [U-Boot-Users] M5282EVB compilation errors

Liew Tsi Chung ha scritto: > Marco, > >> I'm trying to build u-boot-1.1.6 for ColdFire 5282 but I face to >> the following error ( using gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 m68k-elf- >> tools-20031003.sh ) > > Your compiler is out-of-date, please goto > http://www.codesourcery.com/gnu_toolchains/coldfir

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix remaining CONFIG_COMMANDS

update comments Fix coding style Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/api/api_storage.c b/api/api_storage.c index 7cd4efb..7e63240 100644 --- a/api/api_storage.c +++ b/api/api_storage.c @@ -61,21 +61,21 @@ static struct stor_spec specs[ENUM_MAX] = { { 0

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v3] QE IO: Add initial data to pin configuration + read/write functions

David Saada wrote: > No problem. If there's nothing else, I'll repost the patch with this > change (hopefully the last time). > I also implemented commands for reading and writing parallel I/O (pario > read/write), but I'll post this as a separate patch. > David. I still can't apply the patch:

Re: [U-Boot-Users] RFC: Concise Build Output

On 16:11 Wed 23 Jan , Jon Loeliger wrote: > Folks, > > In the spirit of the Linux and Git build systems, > I have a modified U-Boot build system that supports > a much more concise output! One of the primary > motivations for this style of output is that it > will very readily highlight build

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 6/7] 86xx: Add print_laws function to fsl_law.c

This can be used for debug, and will be used by board code to help implement reginfo. Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/misc/fsl_law.c| 19 +++ include/asm-ppc/fsl_law.h |1 + 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/driver

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch] add support for "eeprom info"

On Wednesday 23 January 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > ... and I2C. > > > > i have no idea, i dont use i2c flashes. i dont know if there is any > > standard for them. if there isnt, easy enough to protect with > > CONFIG_SPI. > > We're not talking abo

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 4/7] 86xx: Convert sbc8641d to use new law setup code.

Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- board/sbc8641d/Makefile|2 +- board/sbc8641d/law.c | 58 include/configs/sbc8641d.h |1 + 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) create mode 100644 board/sbc8641d/law.c

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/7] 86xx: Convert mpc8610hpcd to new law setup method.

Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- board/freescale/mpc8610hpcd/Makefile |2 +- board/freescale/mpc8610hpcd/law.c| 44 ++ include/configs/MPC8610HPCD.h|1 + 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) create mode 100644 bo

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/7] 86xx: Support new law setup method and convert mpc8641

Adds the support code in cpu/mpc86xx for the new law setup code recently created fsl_law.c, and changes the MPC8641HPCN config to use this code. Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- board/freescale/mpc8641hpcn/Makefile |2 +- board/freescale/mpc8641hpcn/law.c| 64 +

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 5/7] 86xx: Remove old-style law setup code

This includes mpc8610hpcd, mpc8641hpcn, and sbc8641d. Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- board/freescale/mpc8610hpcd/Makefile |2 - board/freescale/mpc8610hpcd/init.S | 147 board/freescale/mpc8610hpcd/u-boot.lds |1 - board/freescale/mpc864

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 7/7] 86xx: Add reginfo command

Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- common/cmd_reginfo.c | 10 -- cpu/mpc86xx/cpu.c | 24 +++- include/configs/MPC8610HPCD.h |1 + include/configs/MPC8641HPCN.h |1 + include/configs/sbc8641d.h|1 + 5 files changed

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/7] 86xx: Rearrange the sequence in start.S

* split the BAT initialization so that only 2 BATs (for the boot page and stack) are programmed very early on. The rest are initialized later. * Move other BAT setup, ccsrbar setup, and law setup later in the code after translation has been enabled. These changes will facilitate the moving of la

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 0/7] 86xx: New law setup and updated reginfo patchset

This patchset adds support for the new law setup method in fsl_law.c to 86xx. The existing platforms (mpc8641hpcn, mpc8610hpcd, and sbc8641d) are converted to use the new method. The old support is them removed. A print_laws() function is then added to fsl_law.c, and then used to implement a

Re: [U-Boot-Users] 85xx, 86xx: Determine I2C clock frequencies and store in global_data

Andy Fleming wrote: > On Jan 9, 2008 2:35 PM, Timur Tabi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Update global_data to define i2c1_clk and i2c2_clk to 85xx and 86xx. >> >> Update the get_clocks() function in 85xx and 86xx to determine the I2C >> clock frequency and store it in gd->i2c1_clk and gd->i2c2_clk.

[U-Boot-Users] RFC: Concise Build Output

Folks, In the spirit of the Linux and Git build systems, I have a modified U-Boot build system that supports a much more concise output! One of the primary motivations for this style of output is that it will very readily highlight build issues and problems as your build progresses. The original

Re: [U-Boot-Users] 85xx, 86xx: Determine I2C clock frequencies and store in global_data

On Jan 9, 2008 2:35 PM, Timur Tabi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Update global_data to define i2c1_clk and i2c2_clk to 85xx and 86xx. > > Update the get_clocks() function in 85xx and 86xx to determine the I2C > clock frequency and store it in gd->i2c1_clk and gd->i2c2_clk. > > Signed-off-by: Timur T

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 86xx: Fix compilation warning in sys_eprom.c

sys_eeprom.c:82:9: warning: unknown escape sequence '\/' Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Wolfgang, Could you please apply this bugfix directly? Thanks, jdl board/freescale/common/sys_eeprom.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/board

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch] add support for "eeprom info"

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > ... and I2C. > > i have no idea, i dont use i2c flashes. i dont know if there is any standard > for them. if there isnt, easy enough to protect with CONFIG_SPI. We're not talking about flashes. We're talking about EEPROM. For example things like

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch] add support for "eeprom info"

On Wednesday 23 January 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > This patch adds a new sub command to eeprom called "info". This allows > > eeprom driver writers to implement a way of querying the device. For > > example, SPI flashes have status commands, jedec i

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch] add support for "eeprom info"

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > This patch adds a new sub command to eeprom called "info". This allows eeprom > driver writers to implement a way of querying the device. For example, SPI > flashes have status commands, jedec ids, part ids, and other fun stuff. It's > useful to be abl

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] add support for Toradex Colibri module

Dear Daniel, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 09:27:35AM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:13:35AM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote: > > > Patch against 1.3.0 is attached. > > > > Has this patch been taken? I did not receive a pull request from t

Re: [U-Boot-Users] 85xx, 86xx: Determine I2C clock frequencies and store in global_data

Timur Tabi wrote: > Update global_data to define i2c1_clk and i2c2_clk to 85xx and 86xx. > > Update the get_clocks() function in 85xx and 86xx to determine the I2C > clock frequency and store it in gd->i2c1_clk and gd->i2c2_clk. Is there a reason why this patch was never picked up for the 1.3.2 m

Re: [U-Boot-Users] latest (1.3.1) doesn't compile: Makefile issue

Tales Toledo wrote: > Hi > > I saw a previous discussion but I think main reason why 1.3.1 doesn't > compile is different from mentioned there. > I had the same error trying to compile to EP88x with eldk 3.1 toolchains. > > It seems that /common/Makefile conditional CONFIG_CMD_FLASH isn't working

[U-Boot-Users] latest (1.3.1) doesn't compile: Makefile issue

Hi I saw a previous discussion but I think main reason why 1.3.1 doesn't compile is different from mentioned there. I had the same error trying to compile to EP88x with eldk 3.1 toolchains. It seems that /common/Makefile conditional CONFIG_CMD_FLASH isn't working fine. It should be set at previou

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ColdFire: Added M5275EVB support.

David, Matthew's patch is based of commit f18889c2f1... Jan 17 09:35:26 2008 +0100 Merge branch 'master' of git+ssh://10.10.0.7/home/wd/git/u-boot/master. When you cloned the latest as today, there are dozen of patches since then, so the patches show errors when you applied. First, y

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Revised custodian git writeup

On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:27:11 +0100 "Martin Krause" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > behind that was to be able to refere to one particular state in a > > > git repository by one single commit ID. If I have two git > > > repositories with de facto the same content, but with different > > > commit I

Re: [U-Boot-Users] M5282EVB compilation errors

Marco, > I'm trying to build u-boot-1.1.6 for ColdFire 5282 but I face to > the following error ( using gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 m68k-elf- > tools-20031003.sh ) Your compiler is out-of-date, please goto http://www.codesourcery.com/gnu_toolchains/coldfire/download.html to download the latest c

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Revised custodian git writeup

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, January 23, 2008 1:48 PM: > In message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you > wrote: > > > > Huh? Normally the commit IDs are the most important thing I care > > about when working with other git repositories. If I try to compare > > my > > git repositroy with another

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Please pull mpc86xx repository

Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> Sorry to be a bother. I thought I was done >> pulling 86xx stuff yesterday, but two late >> arrivals came in. One is definitely a bug >> fix (EEPROM stuff) and the others are just >> nice features. > > No problem. > >> If you w

[U-Boot-Users] [patch] add support for "eeprom info"

This patch adds a new sub command to eeprom called "info". This allows eeprom driver writers to implement a way of querying the device. For example, SPI flashes have status commands, jedec ids, part ids, and other fun stuff. It's useful to be able to quickly probe this data (so you know things a

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH/RFC v2] 85xx: Initial ePAPR based cpu release support for MP 85xx

Here's an updated version based on Andy's ide of just having additional [args] to release and letting that be handled by arch specific code. Let me know if there are any other comments, if not.. I'll create a proper patch for the 85xx maintainer tree for the next merge window. - k an example of

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Please pull u-boot-mpc85xx.git

Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Applied. Also tested on STX GP3SSA (8555 version) and TQM8540. Both > work fine. Wolfgang, you forgot two patches. These patches were posted to this mailing list, but not included in any custodian repo: [PATCH] QE: Move FDT support into a common file [PATCH v2] Remove #u

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 6/6] [new uImage] Move FDT error printing to common fdt_error() routine

Marian Balakowicz wrote: > FDT error handling in PPC do_bootm_linux() shares the same message format. > This patch moves error message printing to a helper fdt_error() routine. > > Signed-off-by: Marian Balakowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > > lib_ppc/bootm.c | 50 -

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch 0/3] KB9202 CodeSourcery ARM EABI toolchainbuild fixes

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Johannes Stezenbach > Sent: 25 October 2007 17:11 > To: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [patch 0/3] KB9202 CodeSourcery ARM > EABI toolchainbuild fixes > > Hi, > > I'

[U-Boot-Users] M5282EVB compilation errors

Hi, I'm trying to build u-boot-1.1.6 for ColdFire 5282 but I face to the following error ( using gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 m68k-elf-tools-20031003.sh ) a - string.o a - vsprintf.o a - zlib.o make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/koan/u-boot/u-boot-1.1.6/lib_generic' make -C board/m5282evb/ make[1]

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] add support for Toradex Colibri module

On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 09:27:35AM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote: > On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:13:35AM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote: > > Patch against 1.3.0 is attached. > > Has this patch been taken? Is there anything the maintainers of U-Boot dislike about this patch? Or what is the reason for all my me

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 6/6] [new uImage] Move FDT error printing to common fdt_error() routine

FDT error handling in PPC do_bootm_linux() shares the same message format. This patch moves error message printing to a helper fdt_error() routine. Signed-off-by: Marian Balakowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- lib_ppc/bootm.c | 50 -- 1 files changed,

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 5/6] [new uImage] Factor out common routines for getting os/arch/type/comp names

Move numeric-id to name translation for image os/arch/type/comp header fields to a helper routines: image_get_os_name(), image_get_arch_name(), image_get_type_name(), image_get_comp_name(). Signed-off-by: Marian Balakowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- common/cmd_bootm.c | 77 +++

Re: [U-Boot-Users] flashcp checksum problem

sj29fr wrote: >> flashcp is something that is *not* part of the public U-Boot code, so >> please don't expect much help here on the list. Rather ask the guys >> who provided that version of U-Boot to you. >> > > So is there a supported tool to upgrade from linux ? > > Sure. Use mtd-utils

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 4/6] [new uImage] Remove standalone applications handling from boootm

Standalone applications are supposed to be run using the "go" command. This patch removes standalone images handling from the do_bootm(). Signed-off-by: Marian Balakowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- common/cmd_bootm.c | 26 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 25 deletions(

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/6] [new uImage] Remove OF_FLAT_TREE support from PPC bootm code

Support for OF_FLAT_TREE is to be obsoleted in the near future, remove related code from the bootm routines. Signed-off-by: Marian Balakowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- common/cmd_bootm.c | 10 +--- lib_ppc/bootm.c| 65 +--- 2 files change

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/6] [new uImage] Use image API in SH do_bootm_linux() routine

Introduce image handling API for lately added Hitachi SH architecture. Signed-off-by: Marian Balakowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- lib_sh/bootm.c |7 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib_sh/bootm.c b/lib_sh/bootm.c index 14b6815..4e5fe77 100644 --- a/lib_s

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/6] [new uImage] Rename architecture specific bootm code files

Implementation of the do_bootm_linux() and other bootm helper routines is architecture specific code. As such it resides in lib_ directories in files named _linux.c This patch renames those files to a more clear and accurate lib_/bootm.c form. Signed-off-by: Marian Balakowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 0/6] [new uImage] patchset2 - cleanup cont.

Hi, This is a second patchset for new uImage, it includes architecture file renames, removals of OF_FLAT_TREE and standalone application support and further code refactoring. This patchset is based on patchset1. MAKEALL was run for ppc/arm/mips/coldfire, architestures, plus regression tests on li

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Move #ifdef CONFIG_HARD_SPI right after #include

Otherwise asm/mpc8xxx_spi.h is not found for non-ppc targets and compilation fails Signed-off-by: Vlad Lungu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/spi/mpc8xxx_spi.c |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/spi/mpc8xxx_spi.c b/drivers/spi/mpc8xxx_spi.c index

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Use #ifdef CONFIG_FSLDMAFEC

MCD_tasks.c lacks [subject] so compilation of mips targets (and more, probably) fails Signed-off-by: Vlad Lungu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/dma/MCD_tasks.c |6 ++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma/MCD_tasks.c b/drivers/dma/MCD_tasks.c index 694

Re: [U-Boot-Users] flashcp checksum problem

> flashcp is something that is *not* part of the public U-Boot code, so > please don't expect much help here on the list. Rather ask the guys > who provided that version of U-Boot to you. So is there a supported tool to upgrade from linux ? sj29fr -

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [GIT PULL] MIPS updates

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Dear Wolfgang, > > please pull MIPS updates. It's a interesting QEMU target. > > The following changes since commit 4c9e98ace78e7de972adf7da7135a46ec0a4ee7e: > Wolfgang Denk (1): > Merge branch 'master' of git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-mpc86xx

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [GIT PULL v2][SH] Please pull git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-sh.git/

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > The following changes since commit 5dd372a23d12003276dddf7f9604154fd522ae73: > Wolfgang Denk (1): > Merge branch 'master' of git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-sh.

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [GIT PULL] AVR32 update

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > The following changes since commit f188896c2f1594fe749fdb99bbc8c54023cfab3a: > Wolfgang Denk (1): > Merge branch 'master' of git+ssh://10.10.0.7/home/wd/git/u-boot/master > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://www.denx.de/git/

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [U-boot-Users][GIT PULL] Please pull coldfire tree

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Wolfgang, > > The following changes since commit f188896c2f1594fe749fdb99bbc8c54023cfab3a: > Wolfgang Denk (1): > Merge branch 'master' of > git+ssh://10.10.0.7/home/wd/git/u-boot/master > > are available in the git repository at: > > git:

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Pull request - net

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Net code submitters: > > It's very possible that I missed somebody's patch(es). If you think > something's missing, > please let me know ASAP! The only outstanding patch that I'm aware of is J-C > Plagniol-Villard's > update for TFTP file name. > >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [ppc4xx] Please pull git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.git

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > The following changes since commit 8d99cd0691b7094ea1e2bf5309b0877047a9f375: > Stefan Roese (1): > Merge branch 'master' of /home/stefan/git/u-boot/u-boot > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.gi

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Please pull mpc86xx repository

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Sorry to be a bother. I thought I was done > pulling 86xx stuff yesterday, but two late > arrivals came in. One is definitely a bug > fix (EEPROM stuff) and the others are just > nice features. No problem. > If you would, please pick them up! > >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Please pull u-boot-mpc85xx.git

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > are found in the git repository at: > > git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-mpc85xx.git > > Andy Fleming (1): > Merge branch 'kumar' > > Kumar Gala (23): > 85xx: Move LAW init code into C > 85xx: convert MPC8544 DS over to use new LAW init

Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot ADS5121 USB_TTY

Dear Peter, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > I have unfortunately not added an USB driver for the MPC5121e, and now i What a pity... > know why my USB_TTY is not working in U-Boot ;-) > > there needs to be implemented an USB driver for the device Indeed, that has to be the fi

Re: [U-Boot-Users] flashcp checksum problem

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > I tried again to check flash in u-boot, and I think that my problem come from > u-boot which need to read a checksum in a special place. > Flashcp doesn't write any checksum, so is there a way to do it under linux ? > I use a 2.6.17.8 kernel with uboot

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Revised custodian git writeup

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Huh? Normally the commit IDs are the most important thing I care about > when working with other git repositories. If I try to compare my > git repositroy with another one (mostly the u-boot master branch at > denx) then the commit ID is the only way (I

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Please pull u-boot-mpc83xx.git

Thanks Wolfgang Best regards, Dave -Original Message- From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 1/23/2008 8:02 PM To: Liu Dave Cc: Phillips Kim; u-boot-external; Ben Warren Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] Please pull u-boot-mpc83xx.git In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote

Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot ADS5121 USB_TTY

Hi Wolfgang I have unfortunately not added an USB driver for the MPC5121e, and now i know why my USB_TTY is not working in U-Boot ;-) there needs to be implemented an USB driver for the device Regards Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 23-01-2008 12:12:54: > Dear Peter, > > in message [E

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Revised custodian git writeup

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on : > > I'm not sure what happens (how git handles it) if patches are > > applied in different orders. What I'm thinking about is if > > custodians #1 and #2 > > git has no notation of order or sequence. It is storing content only. > If you apply N independent, non-ov

Re: [U-Boot-Users] flashcp checksum problem

Hi all, I tried again to check flash in u-boot, and I think that my problem come from u-boot which need to read a checksum in a special place. Flashcp doesn't write any checksum, so is there a way to do it under linux ? I use a 2.6.17.8 kernel with uboot 1.2.0 and mtd-utils 1.1. ---

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Please pull u-boot-mpc83xx.git

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > also, please apply the patch to fix the broken issue of 83xx immap > > [PATCH] mpc83xx: Correct the struct spi8xxx in mpc8xxx_spi.h This was already included in Kim's repo when I pulled from it. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Enginee

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Please pull u-boot-mpc83xx.git

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Ben submitted a hard SPI driver, and Dave fixed a critical bug for the > mpc8315e-rdb. Please pull: > > The following changes since commit f188896c2f1594fe749fdb99bbc8c54023cfab3a: > Wolfgang Denk (1): > Merge branch 'master' of git+ssh://1

Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot ADS5121 USB_TTY

Dear Peter, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > I have a FreeScale ADS5121 board and would like to use USB_TTY with U-Boot > on this board. You mean, you have added a USB driver for the MPC5121e? That's great news! > When i try to build the newest U-Boot snapshot with the FreeScale LT

[U-Boot-Users] U-Boot ADS5121 USB_TTY

Hi I have a FreeScale ADS5121 board and would like to use USB_TTY with U-Boot on this board. To enable USB_TTY i have added these lines to the u-boot/include/configs/ads5121.h file #define CONFIG_USB_DEVICE 1 #define CONFIG_USB_TTY 1 #define CFG_Console_IS_IN_ENV 1 #define CO