Peter Pearse wrote:
> Dirk
> Your patch is available for test from
>
> cg-clone git://linux-arm.org/u-boot-armdev.git#071012_davinci_timer
>
> Please confirm that the code builds & runs for DaVinci
> cg-clone git://linux-arm.org/u-boot-armdev.git#071012_davinci_timer
arm_git
> cd arm_g
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> As I said in my original posting:
>
> > For size reasons, the patch has been hand edited, splitted in several
> > chunks, and the AT91CAP9.h file (440 kB !) is not in the patch at all.
Will you pelase check this file? Only the insane
include/asm-arm/m
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> Well, this was the first I've tried but it didn't work maybe you could
> explain me the instruction step by step so I can check out where I've made a
> mistake.
"didn't work" is such a vague description that help is impossible.
Please see http://ww
> *** Unexpected exception ***
> Vector Number: 2 Format: 04 Fault Status: 8
>
> PC: 00fea364SR: 2708SP: 00f8fe30
> D0: 0004D1: 0004D2: ffe00154D3: 0055
> D4: 00fea2ceD5: 00ff3106D6: 00fea2ceD7: 00f9ff8a
> A0: 98989898A1: 00fff422A2: 00fff4
David,
After you applied the 5275 patches, did you perform a git rebase? One
ColdFire patch "Fix CFI Flash low level Read/Write macro" is required. The
original macros have address and value swap, and it will cause exception
whenever there is a CFI flash low level read/write performs.
OK, I've tried out the patched version and I can't get it to boot. I've
erased the flash with CF Flasher and reprogrammed, verified, etc. I've
tried programming with both the srec and the bin, and both give the same
results.
In the terminal I get the following:
U-Boot 1.3.1-gad73dc9b (Jan 2
Le vendredi 25 janvier 2008 à 17:35 +, Peter Pearse a écrit :
> Stelian
>
> Your patch was badly formed and/or mangled by your mail client.
Hmmm, strange.
> I have reformed it as best I can and it is available from
>
> git://linux-arm.org/u-boot-armdev.git#080116_at91cap9
>
> However you s
Grant Likely wrote:
> Hey Jon, Wolfgang;
>
> I think this is a good change myself. The biggest reason is that it
> makes the default output terse instead of verbose. I'd hazard to
> wager that most developers don't use 'make -s', MAKEALL, or anything
> else to trim the output (I certainly don't
Stelian
Your patch was badly formed and/or mangled by your mail client.
I have reformed it as best I can and it is available from
git://linux-arm.org/u-boot-armdev.git#080116_at91cap9
However you seem to have omitted the file
include/asm-arm/arch-at91cap9/AT91CAP9.h
needed by
Ladislav
Your patch is available for test from
git://linux-arm.org/u-boot-armdev.git#071212_voiceblue
Sorry for the delay.
Please confirm that it builds and runs on a voiceblue.
You have removed the voiceblue_smallflash_config board.
Can we be certain all such boards have disappeared
Dirk
Your patch is available for test from
cg-clone git://linux-arm.org/u-boot-armdev.git#071012_davinci_timer
Please confirm that the code builds & runs for DaVinci
Regards
Peter
-
This SF.net email is sponsore
On Friday 25 January 2008, J. William Campbell wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Friday 25 January 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> >> Well, there is a big difference between NOR flash and your device:
> >> NOR flash is memory, but your's is a storage device attached to some
> >> bus interface
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 25 January 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
>> Well, there is a big difference between NOR flash and your device:
>> NOR flash is memory, but your's is a storage device attached to some
>> bus interface (SPI here). The problem is that we don't have a good
>>
On Jan 25, 2008, at 9:20 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Seems to me that mpc83xx now needs to have alias nodes in dts to
> assign
> MAC addresses to eth devices when booting linux. Seems a bit
> premature to drop the old way so soon.
> Maybe I am missing something?
Maybe. but if you are going
Destrukto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, this was the first I've tried but it didn't work maybe you could
> explain me the instruction step by step so I can check out where I've made a
> mistake.
Please post exactly what you did and what errors you got, and we'll try
to tell you what you're
On Friday 25 January 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Well, there is a big difference between NOR flash and your device:
> NOR flash is memory, but your's is a storage device attached to some
> bus interface (SPI here). The problem is that we don't have a good
> solution to interface with such d
No Weights, No Pumps, No Surgery 100% effect http://xxcg.andconsider.com
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct
Well, this was the first I've tried but it didn't work maybe you could
explain me the instruction step by step so I can check out where I've made a
mistake.
Thx Destrukto
wd wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Markus wrote:
>>
>> You have to use top of tree U-Boot as a compile fix was ju
Seems to me that mpc83xx now needs to have alias nodes in dts to assign
MAC addresses to eth devices when booting linux. Seems a bit
premature to drop the old way so soon.
Maybe I am missing something?
Jocke
-
This SF.net em
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> at the moment, the Blackfin SPI flash driver hides all of the erasing/writing
> stuff for the user so that it integrates easily into the eeprom command. i'm
> going to guess that you dont like the sound of that at all ;).
You know me pretty well.
W
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Markus wrote:
>
> You have to use top of tree U-Boot as a compile fix was just merged
> recently. Also make sure to read tools/env/README.
And of course you should read the manual and especially the FAQ.
Please do that *before* posting.
See
http://www.denx.de/wiki/
On Thursday 24 January 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > > I think you are doing something wrong when you try to use "eeprom" to
> > > access "SPI flash" - these are differnt entities...
> >
> > let's make sure we're talking about the same thing. SPI flashe
On Thursday 24 January 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> If the device is SPI flash, then why not call it like that, i. e.
>
> spi flash info
i dont like this because of the integration it'd require with the generic spi
command
> Or
> spiflash info
>
> to make it similar to the "nand" com
Well now I had time to solve the problem once and for all. If I look back the
solution was so simple. Because we use a .bat and .tcl file to copy all on
the NAND-Flash we haven't set the active ENV-Block (one redundant and one in
use). Now I simply ad the flag set in the .tcl file and it works:
#
Well now I had time to solve the problem once and for all. If I look back the
solution was so simple. Because we use a .bat and .tcl file to copy all on
the NAND-Flash we haven't set the active ENV-Block (one redundant and one in
use). Now I simply ad the flag set in the .tcl file and it works:
#
In current source code, when the device number of PCI is 0, process PCI
bridge without fail. However, when the device number is 0, it is not PCI
always bridge. There are times when device of PCI allocates.
When CONFIG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE is enable, this problem is solved when
use this patch.
Sig
Hi, Kim.
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:12:54 -0600
Kim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:23:52 +0900
> Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > In current source code, when the device number of PCI is 0, process PCI
> > bridge without fail. However, when the device
Migo-R is a board based on SH7722 and has may devices.
In this patch, supported SCIF, NOR flash and Ethernet.
I removed CONFIG_ETHADDR line.
Signed-off-by: Yusuke Goda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
MAINTAINERS |4 +
MAKEALL |1 +
Makefile|
Hi Destrukto,
Destrukto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well just a simple question, how can I use these commands. I found the
> commands in the tools folder of U-Boot but they can't be compiled. So
Compiles ok here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/git/u-boot$ make env
make -C tools/env all MTD_VERSION=
Well just a simple question, how can I use these commands. I found the
commands in the tools folder of U-Boot but they can't be compiled. So I ask
if someone got experience with this.
THX Destrukto
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Edit-U-Boot-Env-with-fw_printenv---fw_sav
Hi ,Wolfgang.
2008/1/25, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> >
> > > +#define CONFIG_NETMASK 255.255.255.0
> > > +#define CONFIG_IPADDR 192.168.10.100
> > > +#define CONFIG_SERVERIP192.168.10.77
> > > +
31 matches
Mail list logo
