[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for new AVR32 board

Hi This patch adds support for our new AVR32 based board. diff -Nur old/u-boot-1.3.0/board/miromico/hammerhead/config.mk new/u-boot-1.3.0/board/miromico/hammerhead/config.mk --- old/u-boot-1.3.0/board/miromico/hammerhead/config.mk1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++

[U-Boot-Users] CONFIG_NET_MULTI

Hi I don't understand CONFIG_CMD_NET and CONFIG_NET_MULTI. I would expect CONFIG_CMD_NET to be defined whenever I want to have network support in U-Boot, right? And CONFIG_NET_MULTI is defined when I have more then one network interface? I try to adapt U-Boot to our new AVR32 based board.

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for new AVR32 board

On Monday 10 March 2008, Alex wrote: This patch adds support for our new AVR32 based board. Your patch is line wrapped. Please fix this and resubmit. One quick comment without looking too deep into your patch: You are introducing a board specific flash driver. This should not be necessary

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] sh, net: Updated SMSC LAN911x driver and support for MPR2 board

Hello, the attached patch replaces the patch I sent before. I came to the the conclusion that making SMSC's driver comply to the U-Boot coding style would be the right thing because SMSC will most likely not update their driver very often. I hope the driver is now compliant enough. It was really

Re: [U-Boot-Users] CONFIG_NET_MULTI

On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 6:37 AM, Alex Raimondi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I don't understand CONFIG_CMD_NET and CONFIG_NET_MULTI. It's confusing, true. I would expect CONFIG_CMD_NET to be defined whenever I want to have network support in U-Boot, right? And CONFIG_NET_MULTI is

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for new AVR32 board

Hi On Monday 10 March 2008, Alex wrote: This patch adds support for our new AVR32 based board. Your patch is line wrapped. Please fix this and resubmit. One quick comment without looking too deep into your patch: You are introducing a board specific flash driver. This should not

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Flash write crash on MPC8548CDS

On Mar 10, 2008, at 7:35 AM, Eran Liberty wrote: Dear Andy, I experience the same behavior as ksi described. I experience this over u-boot-1.3.2-rc3 which should have had this fixed. I assume you referred to commit 21fae8b2b4e4e6e648796e07e20ab13e9cb18923. Are there any

Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot 1.3.2 release

On Mar 9, 2008, at 12:07 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Hi everybody, U-Boot v1.3.2 has been released and is available from the git repository and the FTP server. The Merge Window for v1.3.3 is open until Mar 31, 23:59:59 MET. Release v1.3.3 is scheduled for May 12, but you know that you

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for new AVR32 board

Hi Alex, Alex wrote: It is again. I suggest that you first send this message to yourself, until you figured out how to do it correctly. And if you are working with git, I strongly encourage you to use git-send-email to send patches. Now tested as you suggested: diff -Nur

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] mpc83xx: make dtb basename file references equal those of linux

Wolfgang Denk wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: I don't think this is a good idea. File names and board config names should match as far as possible, and here is no good reason to deviate from this rule. But the DTS files have already been renamed. The DTS for the

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for new AVR32 board

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Now tested as you suggested: Hmm... ... +#define CFG_LOAD_ADDR(CFG_SDRAM_BASE + 0x0040) +#define CFG_BOOTPARAMS_LEN (16 * 1024) + +/* Other configuration settings that shouldn't have to change all that often */

Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot 1.3.2 release

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: What's the plan for the new-image branch for 1.3.3? It will be merged. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone:

Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot 1.3.2 release

Wolfgang Denk wrote: Top lines changed by employer Gentoo61912 (31.8%) Freescale 40796 (21.0%) How do you determine these numbers? By email address? -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] TQM5200B: update MTD partition layout

- insert partition for dtb blob to TQM5200B MTD layout - set env variables dependent on the configured board (TQM5200 or TQM5200B) Signed-off-by: Martin Krause [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- include/configs/TQM5200.h | 21 - 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] sh: Fix receive FIFO level register of SH4A

Receive FIFO level register is different in SH4A. Because register is different, cannot occasionally receive data. Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/serial/serial_sh.c | 52 +-- 1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 22

Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot 1.3.2 release

On Monday 10 March 2008, Timur Tabi wrote: Wolfgang Denk wrote: Top lines changed by employer Gentoo61912 (31.8%) Freescale 40796 (21.0%) How do you determine these numbers? By email address? why you gotta hate the Gentoo ! :) i dont know if the

Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot 1.3.2 release

On Mar 10, 2008, at 11:26 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Monday 10 March 2008, Timur Tabi wrote: Wolfgang Denk wrote: Top lines changed by employer Gentoo61912 (31.8%) Freescale 40796 (21.0%) How do you determine these numbers? By email address? why