From: Sascha Laue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Laue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/lwmon5/lwmon5.c |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/lwmon5/lwmon5.c b/board/lwmon5/lwmon5.c
index b63fbdc..c29dfc1 100644
--- a/board/lwmon5/lwmon5.c
+++
From: Sascha Laue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Laue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/lwmon5/lwmon5.c|5 +++--
include/configs/lwmon5.h |2 ++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/lwmon5/lwmon5.c b/board/lwmon5/lwmon5.c
index c29dfc1..7bfbb1b
From: Sascha Laue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Laue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
post/post.c |1 +
post/tests.c |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/post/post.c b/post/post.c
index d31829b..99dc8c9 100644
--- a/post/post.c
+++ b/post/post.c
@@ -3
From: Sascha Laue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Laue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
post/board/lwmon5/fpga.c | 58 ++---
1 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/post/board/lwmon5/fpga.c b/post/board/lwmon5/fpga.c
index b48390b
From: Sascha Laue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Laue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
post/board/lwmon5/dsp.c | 21 +++--
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/post/board/lwmon5/dsp.c b/post/board/lwmon5/dsp.c
index a96ac7d..bc12e42 100644
--- a/pos
你好。我公司是一家香港上市公司的下属子公司，在全国大中城市有多家分部。
现在有一部分：工商业销售、建筑安装、咨询、广告服务、餐饮酒店等fa#票
价钱低点如贵公司有业务需要我方诚恳联系贵方携手共创效益。
彼此合作真诚必将成为朋友！
联系人：刘总13691829296
致，礼！
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual
Hi Harald, all
do you or anyone else know, if there is a s3c6400 NAND driver available
somewhere for a recent U-Boot version (not OneNAND)? Preferably with
booting from NAND support?
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
-
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I wonder if this is a common use and if it makes sense to implement
> this for mainstream u-boot, or is this very specific?
This is common use, and U-Boot already support it. See the bootcount
feature (http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/UBootBootCountL
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> + out_be32(address, pattern[i]);
> + /* read other location (protect against data lines capacity) */
> + read_value = in_be16((void *)FPGA_VERSION_REG);
You should perform a 32 bit read here, too.
Best regards,
Wol
All - Freescale crowd,
Carefully reading the manual it becomes evident, though not obvious that
current U-boot UEC driver would crash with any 10BaseT hub connected.
I.e. any RGMII connection with Half Duplex, which the current UEC driver
readily will set, is an illegal mode in the MPC83xx chipse
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> + /* momorize fpga status */
momorize ?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
...
> - while (!gpio_read_in_bit(CFG_GPIO_DSPIC_READY) && reg++ < 1000) {
> + while (gpio_read_in_bit(CFG_GPIO_DSPIC_READY) && reg++ < 1000) {
> udelay(1000);
> }
> - gpio_write_bit(CFG_GPIO_HIGHSIDE, 0);
> if (gpio_rea
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 03:41:58PM +0200, Kenneth Johansson wrote:
> I'm just wondering what the status and plans are with the V2 branch.
>
> Is the plan that at some future date everyone just stops works on the
> main branch and switch over to V2 or is the features of V2 going to be
> ported ove
Hi Guennadi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on :
> Hi Harald, all
>
> do you or anyone else know, if there is a s3c6400 NAND driver
> available somewhere for a recent U-Boot version (not OneNAND)?
> Preferably with booting from NAND support?
I have the U-Boot code delivered by Samsung with the SMDK6400
On Fri, 30 May 2008, Martin Krause wrote:
> Hi Guennadi,
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on :
> > Hi Harald, all
> >
> > do you or anyone else know, if there is a s3c6400 NAND driver
> > available somewhere for a recent U-Boot version (not OneNAND)?
> > Preferably with booting from NAND support?
>
wong wrote:
> hi, all
>
> I'm a newbie to both u-boot and qemu.
> Maybe it's a silly question, but I can not find the solution through the
> Internet for almost 2 weeks, sorry :(
>
> Here is my question:
>
> I wanna run u-boot as a standalone app (or image?) in qemu, and I do't wanna
> any creat
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Robert Schwebel
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 5:50 AM
> To: Kenneth Johansson
> Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] u-boot v2
>
> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 03:41:58PM +0200
This patch removes some dead code from CPCI405 board's
config files. JFFS2 support is also removed. It's not used and
CPCI4052 does not build anymore without some size reduction.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/configs/CPCI4052.h | 38 -
Modified to check for bad blocks and to skipping over them when
CFG_ENV_RANGE has been defined.
CFG_ENV_RANGE must be larger than CFG_ENV_SIZE and aligned to the NAND
flash block size.
signed off by Stuart Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/common/env_nand.c b/common/env_nand.c
index 49742
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 11:14:10AM -0400, Stuart Wood wrote:
> +int writeenv(size_t offset, u_char * buf)
No space after '*'.
> + char_ptr = &buf[amount_saved];
> + if (nand_write(&nand_info[0], offset, &blocksize,
> char_ptr)) {
Wrap long line.
> +
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 04:46:04PM +0300, Micha Kalfon wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> In the last few weeks I've been working on a u-boot driver for
> Sandisk's (MSystems) mDoc H3 device - basically, it's a DiskOnChip
> device which exposes a simple ATA interface to the software and works
> differently f
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 01:58:14PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 08:38:37PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 08:12:28PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> T
New board SIMPC8313 support: MAINTAINERS, MAKEALL,
Makefile
Signed-off-by: Ron Madrid
---
MAINTAINERS |5 +
MAKEALL |2 ++
Makefile| 18 ++
3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index ac7572c..021fc4b 100644
New board SIMPC8313 support: README
Signed-off-by: Ron Madrid
---
doc/README.simpc8313 | 70
++
1 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 doc/README.simpc8313
diff --git a/doc/README.simpc8313
b/doc/README.simpc8313
ne
New board SIMPC8313 support: config SIMPC8313.h
Signed-off-by: Ron Madrid
---
include/configs/SIMPC8313.h | 505
+++
1 files changed, 505 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/configs/SIMPC8313.h
diff --git a/include/configs/SIMPC8313.
New board SIMPC8313 support: support for booting from
NAND in start.S
Reorganization/optimization of a few functions to fit
into the 4K FCM boot RAM of the MPC8313 for nand_spl
build.
Signed-off-by: Ron Madrid
---
cpu/mpc83xx/start.S | 310
---
1
New board SIMPC8313 support: nand_spl
Signed-off-by: Ron Madrid
---
nand_spl/board/sheldon/simpc8313/Makefile | 91
+++
nand_spl/board/sheldon/simpc8313/config.mk | 50
+++
nand_spl/board/sheldon/simpc8313/u-boot.lds | 65
+++
3 files c
New board SIMPC8313 support: Makefile, config.mk
Signed-off-by: Ron Madrid
---
board/sheldon/simpc8313/Makefile | 50
+
board/sheldon/simpc8313/config.mk |3 ++
2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 board/sheldon/simpc8313
New board SIMPC8313 support: nand support
I realize that perhaps these files should be in the
drivers/mtd/nand folder, but I have been informed by
Scott Wood that he will be soon working on nand
support for the MPC83XX(?) family of chips. So these
will be considered temporary and removed at that
New board SIMPC8313 support: nand_boot.c, sdram.c,
simpc8313.c
Remaining board specific files.
Signed-off-by: Ron Madrid
---
board/sheldon/simpc8313/nand_boot.c | 424
+++
board/sheldon/simpc8313/sdram.c | 204
+
board/sheldon/simpc8313/simpc
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 11:15:16AM -0700, Ron Madrid wrote:
> New board SIMPC8313 support: nand_spl
>
> Signed-off-by: Ron Madrid
> ---
> nand_spl/board/sheldon/simpc8313/Makefile | 91
> +++
> nand_spl/board/sheldon/simpc8313/config.mk | 50
> +++
> nan
Ron Madrid wrote:
> New board SIMPC8313 support: nand support
>
> I realize that perhaps these files should be in the
> drivers/mtd/nand folder, but I have been informed by
> Scott Wood that he will be soon working on nand
> support for the MPC83XX(?) family of chips. So these
> will be considere
Sure can. I was not aware of this.
Ron
--- Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ron Madrid wrote:
> > New board SIMPC8313 support: nand support
> >
> > I realize that perhaps these files should be in
> the
> > drivers/mtd/nand folder, but I have been informed
> by
> > Scott Wood that he will
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 08:00:32PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
[...]
> Fix that, but I can still not access the device properly. I'm a bit
> puzzled because it uses a different algorithm to access the device.
> While my and the Linux fsl_upm driver uses NAND_ALE, NAND_CLE and
> friends to man
I'm sorry, I didn't think my e-mail would do that.
I'll fix this.
Ron
--- Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 11:15:16AM -0700, Ron Madrid
> wrote:
> > New board SIMPC8313 support: nand_spl
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ron Madrid
> > ---
> > nand_spl/board/sheldon/simpc83
On May 30, 2008, at 1:08 PM, Ron Madrid wrote:
> New board SIMPC8313 support: README
>
> Signed-off-by: Ron Madrid
> ---
> doc/README.simpc8313 | 70
> ++
> 1 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 doc/README.simpc8313
On May 30, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Ron Madrid wrote:
> New board SIMPC8313 support: support for booting from
> NAND in start.S
>
> Reorganization/optimization of a few functions to fit
> into the 4K FCM boot RAM of the MPC8313 for nand_spl
> build.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ron Madrid
> ---
> cpu/mpc83xx/star
It is. I'll change that.
Thank you,
Ron
--- Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On May 30, 2008, at 1:08 PM, Ron Madrid wrote:
>
> > New board SIMPC8313 support: README
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ron Madrid
> > ---
> > doc/README.simpc8313 | 70
> >
Scott, I this this one is it, and thnaks for pointing out the
nand_erase_opts() function.
Stuart
---
Modified to check for bad blocks and to skipping over them when
CFG_ENV_RANGE has been defined.
CFG_ENV_RANGE must be larger than CFG_ENV_SIZE and aligned to the NAND
flash block size.
signed off
With the limited space I found that I needed to save every byte I could. What
in particular
concerns you?
Ron
--- Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On May 30, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Ron Madrid wrote:
>
> > New board SIMPC8313 support: support for booting from
> > NAND in start.S
> >
> > Re
Hi there
I am working on at91sam9260ek. I have put kernel and rfs on dataflash. Now this
board boots up but doesn't enable eth0. I searched net and found that if I do a
ping it enables phy (MD9161A). But if I do that when there is no network u-boot
never recovers. Can someone tell me the way ou
So does this mean that I need to now base all of my patches off of the
mtd-2.6.22.1 branch on the
u-boot-nand-flash tree? How do the two (u-boot and u-boot-nand-flash)
coincide, or don't they?
It looks like in the Makefile of the mtd-2.6.22.1 branch the version of u-boot
is 1.3.1.
Ron
--- Sco
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 02:01:09PM -0700, Ron Madrid wrote:
> So does this mean that I need to now base all of my patches off of the
> mtd-2.6.22.1 branch on the
> u-boot-nand-flash tree? How do the two (u-boot and u-boot-nand-flash)
> coincide, or don't they?
> It looks like in the Makefile of
> Why don't you use the gpio function?
Well, I tried to use them but that lead to same result.
> > +
> void at91sam9260_i2c_init(void)
> {
> at91_set_GPIO_periph(AT91_PIN_PA23, 0);
> at91_set_multi_drive(AT91_PIN_PA23, 1);
>
> at91_set_A_periph(AT91_PIN_PA24, 0);
Why?
> a
So am I just stuck until then, since we clearly shouldn't put old drivers into
the code, but the
mtd branch is not rebased yet? Or is there some other road I should be
following?
Ron
--- Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 02:01:09PM -0700, Ron Madrid wrote:
> > So
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 03:02:54PM -0700, Ron Madrid wrote:
> So am I just stuck until then, since we clearly shouldn't put old drivers
> into the code, but the
> mtd branch is not rebased yet?
Yes, unless you want to target the current mtd-2.6.22.1 branch (I don't
know how much has changed that
It probably wouldn't be too much trouble for me to revert back to that branch,
but if we are
looking at a matter of weeks then it's probably not worth the time. I guess in
the mean time I'll
just focus on getting something done with the cpu/mpc83xx/start.S file since it
will affect other
boards
---
cpu/mpc83xx/start.S | 310
---
1 files changed, 220 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S b/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S
index 309eb30..39bcaa8 100644
--- a/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S
+++ b/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S
@@ -63,6 +63,9 @@
* U
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 06:47:21AM +0800, Liu Dave wrote:
>
> ---
> cpu/mpc83xx/start.S | 310
> ---
> 1 files changed, 220 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S b/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S
> index 309eb30..39bcaa8 100644
>
> diff --git a/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S b/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S
> index 309eb30..39bcaa8 100644
> --- a/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S
> +++ b/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S
> @@ -63,6 +63,9 @@
> * Use r14 to access the GOT
> */
> START_GOT
> +#if defined(CONFIG_NAND_SPL)
> + GOT_ENTRY(_GOT_TABLE_)
> +#else
>
OK. Thank you for responding, this was my biggest concern. I tried to talk
about what should be
done about this before, but people didn't appear to be very interested.
Is this something that will go into the cpu/mpc83xx/ folder as well? If you'd
like I can strip
out everything that isn't invo
Dear Liu,
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > [Dave] I strongly suggest we create one lite new start.S for the NAND boot,
> >not modify the original start.S
>
> I'd prefer otherwise, if we can keep the #ifdeffing to a minimum.
>
> [Dave] The new start.S for NAND boot should
On May 30, 2008, at 6:00 PM, Ron Madrid wrote:
> OK. Thank you for responding, this was my biggest concern. I tried
> to talk about what should be
> done about this before, but people didn't appear to be very
> interested.
>
> Is this something that will go into the cpu/mpc83xx/ folder as
Online Baskı Merkezi
BODY {
BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ff
}
style1 {
FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-FAMILY: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif
}
style9 {
FONT-FAMILY: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif
}
style12 {
FONT-SIZE: 16px
}
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> First of all, current CONFIG_MIPS32 defines are useless. We can even
>> remove them. What is fine granularity for, huh?
>
> Why are these useless?
There is no user of this config, we can even remove these all.
>> [btw tb0229 is not MIPS32 at all. it's VR4131 based machine
On May 30, 2008, at 5:51 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 06:47:21AM +0800, Liu Dave wrote:
>>
>> ---
>> cpu/mpc83xx/start.S | 310
>> ---
>> 1 files changed, 220 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S b
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> My udelay is already global-variable-free. And as for cycles_per_jiffy
>> and expirelo, we could make it work like this:
> ...
>> -static unsigned int expirelo;
>> +static unsigned long cycles_per_jiffy = (CONFIG_MIPS_TIMER_FREQ +
>> probably have to use the initial data structure for this.
>
> Looked around board_init_r, and it seems there is no {set,get}_timer
> user there. I'm going to leave timestamp as it is at this moment.
s/board_init_r/board_init_f/
58 matches
Mail list logo
