Hi All;
I want to write U-boot for Hitachi SH4 HD6417751 board.
The board contais following peripherals.
1.Real time clock
2.Timer Unit
3.Bus state controller
4.DMA cotroller
5.Serial communication interface
6.I/O Ports
7.Interrupt controller
8.PCI conroller.
For which peripherals I need to write
Hi Stefen,
Thanks for the reply.
Infact I was looking for the info to create a proper 'tlbentry' in 'init.S'
As per my understanding the 'tlbentry' is to map 32-bit address to 36-bit
address.
The 'tlbenry' for the PCI Memory in 'init.S' is :
tlbentry( CFG_PCI_MEMBASE, SZ_256M, 0x, 3,
Dear All,
Thanks for the responses and the information. I am getting the Uboot
source and kernel patches from
http://www.linux4sam.org/twiki/bin/view/Linux4SAM as of now and I will see
if I am able to build and load the image on my own.
Thanks
Ashish Vyas
"Ulf Samuelsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We will price match any store that sells the same items for less
http://www.lomianem.com/
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the bes
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:14:17 -0400
Jerry Van Baren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looking at the source code, its pretty ugly already. Your change
> doesn't make it any more ugly and it could be argued that it is slightly
> less ugly (your patch removes the duplication of the "if( (...)"
> state
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:21:59 -0500
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The U-Boot AT91 MCI driver is no longer the exclusive work
> of Atmel. So, I do not believe that a sole Atmel copyright
> is correct for the AT91 MCI driver.
>
> I added MMC 4.x support to the AT91 MCI driver a while back.
> In resp
Dear Ulf,
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> Atmel provides GPL source for the AT91 on www.linux4sam.org.
Does Atmel include with the product a written offer with clear
information where the source code can be found?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering G
> David, I think this patch has been accomplished by some other patches
> which came in. Could you take a look at the recent patches to
> cpu/mpc85xx/cpu.c and see if those changes reflect everything you
> wanted? If not, please submit a patch on top of those changes.
Andy - these patched seem
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> you wrote:
>>
>> I have a at91sam9261ek evaluation Kit from Atmel and I want to bring
>> up the UBoot on that. When I got the board, I also got UBoot binary
>> which can be flashed and verified. However, I did not get the source
>> code.
