Re: [U-Boot-Users] simplify bootm command

2008-08-05 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Wolfgang Denk a écrit : > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >>> That's why I think we should have an explicit "builtin" command, i. e. >>> command with the name "builtin" that will always run the corresponding >>> builtin command, no if there is a "command alias" or not - similar to >>> the

Re: [U-Boot-Users] simplify bootm command

2008-08-05 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Wolfgang Denk a écrit : > That's why I think we should have an explicit "builtin" command, i. e. > command with the name "builtin" that will always run the corresponding > builtin command, no if there is a "command alias" or not - similar to > the bash command ... and make sure that one can *neve

Re: [U-Boot-Users] using a flat device tree to drive u-boot config

2008-08-04 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Timur Tabi a écrit : > On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Better to just not depend on the DTB at all for basic operation. ie. >> don't brick the board if the DTB is unavailable. > > Is it even possible to have a "recovery mode U-Boot" that is not tied >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] RFC: U-Boot version numbering

2008-08-01 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Feng Kan a écrit : > You can just do v2008.1. That would be v2008.01, then, lest we want FTP sites to put november and december releases between january and february. :) > You can add a third field for the day for those > really serious > bugs:) What, and not be able to crank out several rel

Re: [U-Boot-Users] RFC: U-Boot version numbering

2008-08-01 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Ben Warren a écrit : > Kumar Gala wrote: >> On Aug 1, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I would like to get your general opinion about changing the U-Boot >>> version numbering scheme. >>> >>> To be honest, I never really understood myself how this is supposed

Re: [U-Boot-Users] RFC: U-Boot version numbering

2008-08-01 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Wolfgang Denk a écrit : > Hello, > > I would like to get your general opinion about changing the U-Boot > version numbering scheme. > > To be honest, I never really understood myself how this is supposed > to work and if the next version should be 1.3.4 or 1.4.0 or 2.0.0, i. > e. which cha

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Please Help me to Setup & Send Patch using M$ Office

2008-08-01 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Wolfgang Denk a écrit : > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> so please help me setup either M$ Office or guide me to send patches through >> nabble forum > > Type: man git-send-email Note that some host development platforms do not have git-send-email installed along automatically. I h

Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-boot and Mathematical Library

2008-07-29 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Vincenzo Scianni a écrit : > Hi to everyone. > > I have a general question: my need is to use u-boot to initialize a > PowerPC 5123 and then to continue with a custom kernel without Linux. > The problem is that during initialization I must drive very early a > graphical controller by PCI to sh

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [yes, i tried rtfming docs]u-boot on x86, how to?

2008-07-26 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Geraldo Netto a écrit : > i tried the steps at http://www.denx.de/wiki/DULG/Manual > but i was not able to make it work on x86 > does anyone have any tip/doc(s) on how to make u-boot work on x86? > i'd really appreciate that help :P Hello, You *might* get some help if you specify what exactly yo