Re: [U-Boot-Users] Release status - things to be done

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Open question: >> >> * Are CFG_64BIT_LBA and CONFIG_LBA48 kind of redundant? >> At least it seems that CONFIG_LBA48 requires CFG_64BIT_LBA to be >> set or we will have problems due to insufficient size of the data >> types. Ok, I see. CFG_64

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Release status - things to be done

Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Open question: > > * Are CFG_64BIT_LBA and CONFIG_LBA48 kind of redundant? > At least it seems that CONFIG_LBA48 requires CFG_64BIT_LBA to be set > or we will have problems due to insufficient size of the data types. Hi. I wrote the LBA48 patches a lng time ago (~4

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ARM926: Display Ethernet infoindo_bdinfo only if CONFIG_CMD_NET is defined

Peter Pearse wrote: > Wolfgang > You wrote: >> And ARM doesn't even have a specific way to pass the MAC address to >> Linux. > Please expand on this comment for me. He is referign to the numerous kcooments on this list over the past few years of how ARM dos not have a way for u-boot

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Standalone hello_world, data abort error on ARM926 (AP)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Thanks again for your quick reponse, > No matter what address i choose it is not working; below is > my memory map > > 03000148 T app_startup This looks more like an entry point (I'm not too familiar with ARM, so I'm probably wrong) > VersatileAB # go