Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/3] Fixup simple compile error when debug defined - resubmit

Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > Small compile bug crept in when debug defined. > > Attached patch removes. > > > Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > > diff --git a/common/fdt_support.c b/common/fdt_support.c Hi Bryan, Kumar stole your patch and Wolfgang has applied it so we

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Reg to Know about U boot Porting

Karthikeyan Kadirvel, Chennai wrote: > > Hai friends > > I am new to this U loader > I have to porting U loader for a MCF54450 processor. > So can u direct me? > What are the things have to concentrate on. > > *Thanks.* > *Karthikeyan K,* Hi Karthikeyan, The place to start is to clone the git

Re: [U-Boot-Users] RFC: Concise Build Output

Grant Likely wrote: > On 1/23/08, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Dear Jon, >> >> in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >>> In the spirit of the Linux and Git build systems, >>> I have a modified U-Boot build system that supports >>> a much more concise output! One of the primary >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Revised custodian git writeup

Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: [snip] >> I'm not sure what happens (how git handles it) if patches are applied in >> different orders. What I'm thinking about is if custodians #1 and #2 > > git has no notation of order or sequence. It is storing content only.

[U-Boot-Users] Revised custodian git writeup

I've rewritten the "Tips for maintaining custodian trees" section to reflect Wolfgang's request that the "master" branch be used for patches for him to pull. Conceptually, this is very different from my prev

Re: [U-Boot-Users] How to patch u-boot?

Harald Welte wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 10:07:07AM -0500, Jerry Van Baren wrote: > >> Openmoko has not been an active participant on the u-boot list. > > Mh, please check your list archives. I see 22 postings over the last > year. Not many, but also !=- 'not been active'. Good to know,

Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot versions

k b wrote: > Gerald, > Thanks for your response. > > I have had a 1.1.3 running on a board for 3+ yrs now, and i might add with > any problems. > Now as I'm moving to a newer version of the board I'm evaluating the effort > level vs extra features that newer version of uboot gets me. > hence th

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Refactor code for "i2c sdram" command

Larry Johnson wrote: > Signed-off-by: Larry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > N.B.: This patch assumes my previous patch to "common/cmd_i2c.c". > > common/cmd_i2c.c | 511 > +++--- > 1 files changed, 220 insertions(+), 291 deletions(-) Ditto.

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix "i2c sdram" command for DDR2 DIMMs

Larry Johnson wrote: > Many of the SPD bytes for DDR2 SDRAM are not interpreted correctly by the > "i2c sdram" command. This patch provides correct alternative > interpretations when DDR2 memory is detected. > > Signed-off-by: Larry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > Hi Wolfgang and Stefan and g