[U-Boot-Users] newbie mailing list (WAS Re: test program crashing)

2010-02-17 Thread Michael Trimarchi
m in the startup. The welcome message can give them all the info to init: - FAQ page on your website - some reference in the web etc Michael -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace,

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/4][RFC] Add ehci core functionality

2008-11-25 Thread michael
Hi, Markus Klotzbücher wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:22:51AM +0100, michael wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have redone the patch. What do you think? >> >> I can't test them. They compile. >> > > Not for me (board is sequoia): > >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/4][RFC] Add ehci core functionality

2008-11-25 Thread michael
Hi, Markus Klotzbücher wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:22:51AM +0100, michael wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have redone the patch. What do you think? >> >> I can't test them. They compile. >> > > Not for me (board is sequoia): > >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/4][RFC] Add ehci core functionality

2008-11-25 Thread michael
Hi, Remy Bohmer wrote: > Hello Michael, > >> I have redone the patch. What do you think? >> I can't test them. They compile. > > It is a big change for leaving untested... > Can anybody provide an ack for these patches? > > Kind Regards, > > Remy >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/4][RFC] Add ehci core functionality

2008-11-21 Thread michael
Hi, I have redone the patch. What do you think? I can't test them. They compile. Regards Michael >From ee642cb0ea921463f332e402df7d7d4a32218706 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:19:15 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Add ehci core

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Unable to boot linux 2.6.25 with U-Boot 1.1.4

2008-06-24 Thread michael
mpressing > Linux.. > done, booting the kernel. Activate in the linux kernel CONFIG_LL_DEBUG ( maybe ?! ) and check that the u_boot_board_id == linux_board_id Regards Michael - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketpl

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/4][RFC] Add ehci core functionality

2008-06-23 Thread michael
default: DBG("unknown value %x", swap_16(req->value)); goto unknown; } break; case USB_REQ_SET_ADDRESS | (USB_RECIP_DEVICE << 8): rootdev = swap_16(req->value);

[U-Boot-Users] ide arm support

2008-05-02 Thread michael
Hi, can anyone can give some kind of feedback to the ide arm support patch? I just introduce linux io function and put in the u-boot makefile and modify a little bit the board.c in lib_arm directory. ACK or NACK and why! Michael

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH ARM/IXP465 1/3] Add support for the ixp465 processor

2008-04-29 Thread michael
+#ifdef CONFIG_IXP465 >> > ... > >> +#else >> > > That's a pretty mess of #ifdef's. > > Maybe we should split this into separate source files? > > I try to write just one ifdef, and duplicate a little bit the code. Is good fo

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH ARM/IXP465 3/3] Add support for the ixdp465 evaluation board

2008-04-28 Thread michael
Hi > Ditto here. > > >> +#define CFG_DRAM_BASE 0x >> +#define CFG_DRAM_SIZE 0x0800 >> > > Is this SDRAM or DRAM ? Seems to be a bit redundant here... > > > Best regards, > >

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH ARM/IXP465 0/3] IXP465 support

2008-04-28 Thread michael
Hi, The following patches add basic support for the IXP465 processor and the IXDP465 board. Comments are welcomed. Thanks, Michael - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH ARM/IXP465 3/3] Add support for the ixdp465 evaluation board

2008-04-28 Thread michael
Add support for the ixdp465 evaluation board Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Makefile |3 + board/ixdp465/Makefile| 47 board/ixdp465/config.mk |3 + board/ixdp465/ixdp465.c | 62 ++ board/i

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH ARM/IXP465 2/3] Add the new include file for cpu support

2008-04-28 Thread michael
Add the include file for IXP465 cpu support Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/asm-arm/arch-ixp/hardware.h | 24 ++ include/asm-arm/arch-ixp/ixp465.h | 580 +++ 2 files changed, 604 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) creat

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH ARM/IXP465 1/3] Add support for the ixp465 processor

2008-04-28 Thread michael
This patch add basic support to the ixp465 cpu. Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- cpu/ixp/cpu.c|2 +- cpu/ixp/interrupts.c |2 +- cpu/ixp/npe/npe.c|2 +- cpu/ixp/pci.c|2 +- cpu/ixp/serial.c |2 +- cpu/ixp/start.S

Re: [U-Boot-Users] FW: USB SUPPORT & get_vfatname

2008-04-27 Thread michael
t to fix fat32 problem on u-boot. I don't send any more archive on the mailing list. Regards Michael - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. T

Re: [U-Boot-Users] FW: USB SUPPORT & get_vfatname

2008-04-27 Thread michael
Hi, I prepare a new versione of fat support to test in user space, with some modification of the function. So before to post a patch in u-boot mailing list, we can adjust the library. I send an archive that contains a first step in this direction Regards Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: [U-Boot-Users] FW: USB SUPPORT & get_vfatname

2008-04-26 Thread michael
s. I start to rewrite it in my spare time and so I hope that you will fix the remain problems. Regards Michael - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting e

Re: [U-Boot-Users] ide arm support

2008-04-26 Thread michael
Hi, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Note: you addressed this question to the Mailing List, not to any > specific person. > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk > I'm sorry. regards Michael - This SF.

[U-Boot-Users] ide arm support

2008-04-25 Thread michael
Hi, when do you have spare time can you give some feedback about arm ide patch? Regards Michael - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There&#x

Re: [U-Boot-Users] FW: USB SUPPORT & get_vfatname

2008-04-25 Thread michael
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Michael Trimarchi wrote: > > >> confirm that the problem is in fat.c file and I will try to fix. >> > > It has been confirmed that fatls does _not_ list > all files on FAT32 filesystems. > > There are _no_ reports of fatls

Re: [U-Boot-Users] FW: USB SUPPORT & get_vfatname

2008-04-25 Thread michael
Hi, confirm that the problem is in fat.c file and I will try to fix. Michael - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still ti

Re: [U-Boot-Users] FW: USB SUPPORT & get_vfatname

2008-04-24 Thread michael
Hi, just to know! What is the log if you define the USB_STOR_DEBUG in the usb_storage.c Can you send me the log? Regards Michael Adrian Filipi wrote: > > The patch didn't improve my first few test cases. CF and USB on > an EP93xx board. > > I'm send

Re: [U-Boot-Users] FW: USB SUPPORT & get_vfatname

2008-04-24 Thread michael
me a dd of a compact flash of 64Mb that failed. I rewrite it and test and maybe post a patch. Regards Michael Adrian Filipi wrote: > > FYI, I too have been seeing this problem. It is 100% > reproducible. It seems to be a FAT32 problem with media 256MB and > smaller. > >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] USB SUPPORT & get_vfatname

2008-04-24 Thread michael
(4))); fat/fat.c:__u8 get_dentfromdir_block[MAX_CLUSTSIZE] __attribute__((aligned(4))); fat/fat.c:__u8 do_fat_read_block[MAX_CLUSTSIZE] __attribute__((aligned(4))); Your test in my CF card works without problem. Regards Michael

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH ARM 0/2] Ide support

2008-04-24 Thread michael
Hi, The following patches add support for the ide support on arm system. Tested on a little endian machine s3c2410 Comments are welcomed. Thanks, Michael - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH ARM 2/2] Ide support. Ide registration

2008-04-24 Thread michael
Add ide registration for arm system. Michael [PATCH] Add ide registration for arm system. Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- lib_arm/board.c |6 ++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib_arm/board.c b/lib_arm/board.c index 2

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH ARM 1/2] Ide support io function

2008-04-24 Thread michael
Add arm readsw and writesw function for armv4 architecure. Tested on a s3c2410 little endian machine. Michael [PATCH] Add arm readsw and writesw function for armv4 architecure. Tested on a s3c2410 little endian machine. Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- l

Re: [U-Boot-Users] USB SUPPORT & get_vfatname

2008-04-24 Thread michael
get_fatent, init to -1 */ } fsdata; The fatbuf is on the top? Regards Michael > Michael, > > Sorry, your latest get_vfatname patch doesn't work either. > > FAT16 works perfectly, so the USB code is probably _not_ at fault. I see > only problems with FAT32, but only for _so

Re: [U-Boot-Users] USB SUPPORT & get_vfatname

2008-04-23 Thread michael
Hi, michael wrote: > Hi, > > Can you try this one? > > Revert my last one patch? > It change the test code, before the while. I use your script on a > Compact Flash and it looks fine for me (under linux)

Re: [U-Boot-Users] USB SUPPORT

2008-04-23 Thread michael
Hi, Can you try this one? Revert my last one patch? It change the test code, before the while. I use your script on a Compact Flash and it looks fine for me (under linux). Regards Michael Check if the entry is a valid dir_slot entry, otherwise it is a dentry and the name has to be taken by

Re: [U-Boot-Users] How to set CPU speed to 266mhz s3c2410?

2008-04-23 Thread michael
#define M_MDIV 0xC3 #define M_PDIV 0x4 #define M_SDIV 0x1 Regards Michael - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to s

Re: [U-Boot-Users] USB SUPPORT

2008-04-22 Thread michael
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > --- Introduction --- > > This thread concerns possible problems with fs/fat/fat.c > (incorrect fatls output and inaccessible files via > fatload) even when recent "git" patches have been applied > to fat.c. VFAT is enabled. > > Mich

Re: [U-Boot-Users] USB SUPPORT

2008-04-22 Thread michael
/ > 808465457 ho > 0.000/ > 544172131 28000.000 > 1667566090 ". > > 0.10./ > 2016419949 ; > 808464432 .ite > 538976266 0x20.00 > > > 40 file(s), 17 dir(s) > > U-Boot> > Can you give an image of it?

Re: [U-Boot-Users] USB SUPPORT

2008-04-21 Thread michael
FAT32 > formatted media, but I never had any problem > with FAT16 formatted media. > > Sincerely, > > Ken Fuchs > > Can you try this patch? In the git log there is another patch for vfat to be applied. Regards Michael Check if the entry is a valid dir_slot entry, otherwise

Re: [U-Boot-Users] AT91SAM9260EK with KS8721 PHY

2008-04-08 Thread michael
} printf("phy_id %x found at %d\n", phy_id, i); #else phy_id = macb_mdio_read(macb, MII_PHYSID1); #endif Michael - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and

Re: [U-Boot-Users] regarding u-boot porting

2008-04-04 Thread michael
Hi, what kind of problems? Regards Michael - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;135

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] get_vfatname

2008-04-04 Thread michael
you can write on ide disk or on a Compact >> Flash. >> Is ok? >> > > Actually I'd prefer a script to create such an image, but if this is > impossible (?) then an image will do, too. > Do you receive the link? Regards Michael -

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] get_vfatname

2008-04-01 Thread michael
; file system which provokes the error? > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk > > I can give you an image that you can write on ide disk or on a Compact Flash. Is ok? Michael - Check out the new SourceForg

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] mpc8323erdb: define CONFIG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE

2008-03-28 Thread Michael Barkowski
Commit 55774b512fdf63c0516d441cc5da7c54bbffb7f2 broke the onboard USB controller on the PCI bus in Linux on the MPC8323ERDB. This fixes it by defining CONFIG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE in the board's config file. Signed-off-by: Michael Barkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Kim, please consid

Re: [U-Boot-Users] s3c2440 -- serial_init

2008-03-28 Thread michael
d then after certain loops > it goes to the hang function and hangs there. > > What could be the problem? Or am I doing some wrong initializations? > > Are you sure that the memory inizializzation is correct? Regards Michael --

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] get_vfatname

2008-03-28 Thread michael
f vfat filesystem, I take a look to the linux code and to experimental result. The block that is read by the gc_getcluster function is not a dir_slot but a dir_entry. Regards Michael - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketpl

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] get_vfatname

2008-03-28 Thread michael
vfat filesystem, I take a look to the linux code and to experimental result. The block that is read by the gc_getcluster function is not a dir_slot but a dir_entry. Regards Michael - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketpl

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] mpc8323erdb: fix EEPROM page size and get MAC from EEPROM

2008-03-27 Thread Michael Barkowski
-byte values should have it's CRC at the end. crc32 and eeprom commands can be used to accomplish this. If CRC fails, MAC addresses come from the environment. If CRC succeeds, the environment is overwritten at startup. Signed-off-by: Michael Barkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Kim, Pl

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] get_vfatname

2008-03-27 Thread michael
Hi, I find a problem related to the get_vfatname function. This is my proposal patch. Regards Michael Check if the entry is a valid dir_slot entry, otherwise it is a dentry and the name has to be taken by the get_name function Signed-off-by: michael trimarchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -

[U-Boot-Users] PCI broken on MPC8323ERDB

2008-03-25 Thread Michael Barkowski
This commit in U-Boot tree breaks the PCI in Linux MPC8323ERDB. Do I need to define CONFIG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE now? I don't see any other boards defining it. commit 55774b512fdf63c0516d441cc5da7c54bbffb7f2 Author: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri Mar 7 16:04:25 2008 +0900

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Problem with flash cfi legacy mode

2008-03-21 Thread Michael Schwingen
ause 8-bit flashs only have an 8-bit ID. >> > > Can one asume that a chip with chipwidht 16 always has an ID of 16bit? > And how does AMD expanded 3byte id mode fit? If its safe to just change > the read it should be trivial to fix(?) > I think it should be OK to use

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/3] mpc8323erdb: Improve the system performance

2008-03-20 Thread Michael Barkowski
clks to 11clks. (based on Trfc=75ns) 10. TIMING_CFG_2[FOUR_ACT] is changed from 10 clks to 7clks. (based on Tfaw=50ns) 11. TIMING_CFG_2[ADD_LAT] and DDR_MODE[AL] changed from 0 to 1 (based on CL=3 and WL=2). Signed-off-by: Michael Barkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Kim Ph

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/3] mpc8323erdb: remove RTC and add EEPROM

2008-03-20 Thread Michael Barkowski
There's no on-board RTC on the MPC8323ERDB, but there is an EEPROM. Signed-off-by: Michael Barkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Kim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/configs/MPC8323ERDB.h |7 --- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] mpc8323erdb: use readable DDR config macros

2008-03-20 Thread Michael Barkowski
Use available shift/mask macros to define DDR configuration. Signed-off-by: Michael Barkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Kim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/configs/MPC8323ERDB.h | 50 ++-- 1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 8 deleti

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Problem with flash cfi legacy mode

2008-03-14 Thread Michael Schwingen
ly have an 8-bit ID. > Further on it seems like CFI_CMDSET_AMD_LEGACY is unsupported in > flash_write_cfibuffer. > Right. Setting info->buffer_size = 1 in jedec_flash.c/fill_info() should make sure that part of code is never executed. cu Michael ---

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add flash programming counter]

2008-03-06 Thread Michael Schwingen
all terminals, no? No matter how it is implemented, I am strongly in favor of *some* kind of progress output. If it is possible to estimate how long the operation will take, this would be a big plus IMHO (which precludes the simple d

Re: [U-Boot-Users] uboot 1.3.0 (with Atmel patch 1.5) and DAVICOM Phy -> Autonegotiation ?

2008-03-03 Thread michael
Hi, I use the macb driver of the latest git for the at91sam9260. For an example use at91cap board. Regards Michael - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH V2] Fix checking fat32 cluster size.

2008-03-02 Thread michael
Signed-off-by: michael trimarchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- fs/fat/fat.c |8 include/fat.h |3 ++- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/fat/fat.c b/fs/fat/fat.c index c1e5741..49c78ed 100644 --- a/fs/fat/fat.c +++ b/fs/fat/fat.c @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@

[U-Boot-Users] Fat32 cluster size

2008-03-02 Thread michael
boot projects Regards Michael - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ _

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Altera Stratix II

2008-03-01 Thread Michael Schwingen
oms with different/incorrect > data. > I am quite sure you can't write to the CFI data structures in flash. cu Michael - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges.

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix checking fat32 cluster size.

2008-03-01 Thread michael
This patch fix the checking of cluster size in fat32 filesystem. The current implementation was broken. Signed-off-by: michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- fs/fat/fat.c |8 include/fat.h |3 ++- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/fat/fat.c b/

Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot v1.3.2-rc2 released

2008-02-29 Thread Michael Schwingen
rrives. >From 23ce4f89cae10202ee5632608b115859774aaa7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Schwingen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:48:02 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] add CONFIG_MII_ETHSWITCH support to IXP42x npe driver Signed-off-by: Michael Schwingen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- cpu/ixp/npe/npe.c |

Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot v1.3.2-rc2 released

2008-02-27 Thread Michael Schwingen
42x GPIO_INT_ACT_LOW_SET can't handle interrupt lines above GPIO8 at all - these are set in IXP425_GPIO_GPIT2R instead of IXP425_GPIO_GPIT1R. For a quick fix, removing the set for the interrupt line should be OK, since the board does not use PCI in u-boot (yet): Signed-off-by: Michael Schwingen

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Problem with PXA PCMCIA & (IDE) CF

2008-02-25 Thread michael
mething goes wrong! > > Any suggestions? > > Rodolfo > > This happen in the true ide mode when the timings are wrong so maybe you have the same problem in pcmcia mode. Michael - This SF.net email is sponsor

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Generic PHY in macb

2008-02-24 Thread Michael Schwingen
pick? (hint: 0x13 is wrong, even if it is the only one that shows a 100Mbps link). Also, this really is a board with working MDIO, with correct pullups, so no "ghost" PHYs in the list. cu Michael - This SF.net ema

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Generic PHY in macb

2008-02-24 Thread Michael Schwingen
michael wrote: > I add the cycle only for testing and works, now I will take a look to the > mii layer in the u-boot and maybe find a better and clean solution if I have > spare time. > Did I get that right - you added a loop to check all PHY addresses,and now it works on your bo

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Generic PHY in macb

2008-02-23 Thread michael
Hi, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:02:13 + (GMT) > Michael Trimarchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> In any case, the dm9161a PHY in question does implement MDIO, so it >>> really should work without any modifications. >>&

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Generic PHY in macb

2008-02-22 Thread Michael Schwingen
in the form of CONFIG_PHY*_ADDR ;-) cu Michael - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Generic PHY in macb

2008-02-22 Thread Michael Trimarchi
Hi, - Messaggio originale - > Da: Haavard Skinnemoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > A: Michael Trimarchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Michael Schwingen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Inviato: Venerdì 22 febbraio 2008, 17:08:56 > Oggett

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Generic PHY in macb

2008-02-22 Thread Michael Trimarchi
Hi - Messaggio originale - > Da: Haavard Skinnemoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > A: Michael Schwingen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Michael Trimarchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Inviato: Venerdì 22 febbraio 2008, 16:34:03 > Oggett

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Generic PHY in macb

2008-02-22 Thread Michael Schwingen
(I have worked with the Marvell M88E6050) do not even have MDIO - the MII runs fixed, and the TP ports can either autonegotiate, or can be set to fixed 10/100/halfduplex operation using strapping pins. cu Michael - This S

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Generic PHY in macb

2008-02-22 Thread Michael Schwingen
s different from the case with the hardwired ethernet switch - in case of the switch, we know that the MII port is always running at 100Mbps, full-duplex. cu Michael - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microso

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Generic PHY in macb

2008-02-22 Thread michael
Hi Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:27:48 + (GMT) > Michael Trimarchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> When I read to my id u-boot report 0x and fail, but >> the device works pretty well skipping this testing. >> If I

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Generic PHY in macb

2008-02-22 Thread Michael Trimarchi
Hi, - Messaggio originale - > Da: Haavard Skinnemoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > A: Michael Trimarchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Inviato: Venerdì 22 febbraio 2008, 13:52:09 > Oggetto: Re: [U-Bo

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Generic PHY in macb

2008-02-22 Thread Michael Trimarchi
t; return 0; > > +#endif > > You mean a PHY that isn't actually hooked up? > The CONFIG_GENERIC_PHY is not u-boot option currently. This patch is a proposal. Regards Michael ___ L'email della prossima g

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Generic PHY in macb

2008-02-22 Thread Michael Trimarchi
Hi, > On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:41:17 +0100 > michael wrote: > > > Add support for Generic PHY in macb. > > > > Signed-off-by: michael > > What's a "generic PHY"? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/git/u-boot/master$ grep -r GENERIC_PHY >

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Generic PHY in macb

2008-02-22 Thread michael
Add support for Generic PHY in macb. Signed-off-by: michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/net/macb.c |4 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/macb.c b/drivers/net/macb.c index 9c98338..2a6fc5d 100644 --- a/drivers/net/macb.c +++ b/drive

Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot on Windows

2008-02-20 Thread michael
oLinux under windows and then install > a pre-compiled toolchain (e.g. from uClinux.org) under coLinux. > > Regards, > Wolfgang > > > just try to download the kagel crosstool. It build crosstoolchain

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch] do not use cmd_reset uninitialized in cfi_flash.c

2008-02-18 Thread Michael Schwingen
> > Right. But it will be an improvement to the current implementation, where a > random command is written as RESET command. And also an improvement to the > fixed AMD/Intel RESET command. So I vote for trying this solution. I'll test > on a few of mine platforms too.

Re: [U-Boot-Users] ramdisk problem (once again?)

2008-02-13 Thread michael
;>> >>> >> If you want to use it, put in ram before... Regards Michael >> > > yesm that's the status quo - but it's plain stupid. Why add another > I just answer to the question. > memory copy of megabytes of data, when the kernel

Re: [U-Boot-Users] ramdisk problem (once again?)

2008-02-12 Thread michael
passed to the kernel. >> > > The kernel.org tree does not recognize a ramdisk image in flash. > Patches have been posted here since 2.4.17 times, but never made it > upstream. See the archives ... > If you want to use it, put in ram before... Regards Michael ---

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

2008-02-12 Thread michael
Ok E Robertson wrote: >> Can you send me your diff? >> > > The diff I'm using is attached. > Thanks. > I'm talking about your adding code. Don't use the mailing list for send code. Regards Michael --

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

2008-02-12 Thread michael
E Robertson wrote: > On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> That's exactly what I have but I always get this after about 24% : >>> >>> * >>> SEND-class command failed.

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

2008-02-12 Thread michael
E Robertson wrote: > On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>>> Do you try to >>>> load with a jtag in memory and execute it? >>>> >>>> >>> I don't have a jtag fitted for th

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

2008-02-12 Thread michael
gt;> Do I need to changs this? >> >> > > > You will not be able to store U-Boot in the SDRAM until the SDRAM > has been initialized, so that is not an option. > > If you start u-boot that works the sdram it initialized so you can using

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

2008-02-12 Thread michael
Hi, > >> Do you try to >> load with a jtag in memory and execute it? >> > > I don't have a jtag fitted for this as yet. I'm using the sam7 util. > > Simple step: - flash the work system - loady put you ver

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

2008-02-12 Thread michael
h, do you write somenthing after the u-boot that overwrite it. Do you try to load with a jtag in memory and execute it? Regards Michael - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual St

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

2008-02-12 Thread michael
Hi, E Robertson wrote: > On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>>> So, do you change the text base? >>>> >>>> >>> No I did not. I don't have a reason to. Why? >>> Is the

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

2008-02-12 Thread michael
Hi, >> So, do you change the text base? >> > > No I did not. I don't have a reason to. Why? > > Sorry I think that you talk about config.mk board//config.mk TEXT_BASE = 0x21f0 - This SF.net email is sponsored by:

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

2008-02-12 Thread michael
E Robertson wrote: > On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> Hi All, >>> I made some changes to u-boot-1.1.5 atmel patch 1.5 and rebuild uboot. >>> However, after rebuilding it would not run uboot. >>> Has

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ide arm support

2008-02-12 Thread michael
Hi, > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 10:58:23PM +0100, michael wrote: > >> The code is fill with ugly ifdef. >> > > That probably shouldn't be read as permission to add a few more... > > :(, ok >> Can you suggest me something better? >>

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

2008-02-12 Thread michael
t; boots so I guess I might be missing something. DataFlash is enabled > and all the options looks good so I'm not sure why it's stuct at the > RomBoot. I've rebuild both the dataflash bootstrap and uboot several > time with no luck so far. Does

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ide arm support rev 1

2008-02-11 Thread michael
Add ide support to the arm cpu. Tested on little endian machine. Include #define __io in config board file. Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff --git a/common/cmd_ide.c b/common/cmd_ide.c index c38be4f..e507c15 100644 --- a/common/cmd_ide.c +++ b/common/cmd

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ide arm support

2008-02-11 Thread michael
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 21:40 Mon 11 Feb , michael wrote: > >> Add ide support to the arm cpu. Tested on arm little endian >> machine. Include #define __io in config board file. >> >> Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ide arm support

2008-02-11 Thread michael
Hi > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 10:30:08PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > wrote: > >> On 21:40 Mon 11 Feb , michael wrote: >> >>> --- a/common/cmd_ide.c >>> +++ b/common/cmd_ide.c >>> @@ -934,7 +934,14 @@ output_data(int d

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ide arm support

2008-02-11 Thread michael
Add ide support to the arm cpu. Tested on arm little endian machine. Include #define __io in config board file. Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff --git a/common/cmd_ide.c b/common/cmd_ide.c index c38be4f..e507c15 100644 --- a/common/cmd_ide.c +++ b/common/cmd

Re: [U-Boot-Users] ide support on arm

2008-02-09 Thread michael
Hi, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > >>> Indeed. There is no magic way for your code to make it into the >>> public source tree without you posting proper patches first. >>> >>> >> I have two patches pending: >> - ide arm >> - ixp465 patch (posted one ye

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix incorrect address test in AT91F_DataflashSelect().

2008-02-06 Thread michael
; - && int) addr) & 0xFF00) == > + && int) *addr) & 0xFF00) == > dataflash_info[i].logical_address)) { > addr_valid = 1; > break; >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch] do not use cmd_reset uninitialized in cfi_flash.c

2008-02-05 Thread Michael Schwingen
will be an improvement to the current implementation, where a > random command is written as RESET command. And also an improvement to the > fixed AMD/Intel RESET command. So I vote for trying this solution. I'll test > on a few of mine platforms too. > > Michael, could please y

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch] do not use cmd_reset uninitialized in cfi_flash.c

2008-02-04 Thread Michael Schwingen
you (or somebody else) have HW available to test such a change? > I think I can run tests on a small set (~5-10 different AMD-commandset and 2 intel-commandset, all 16 bit) flashs, but that still leaves the (small) possibility that there are flash roms t

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch] do not use cmd_reset uninitialized in cfi_flash.c

2008-02-03 Thread Michael Schwingen
t commands - if the flash safely ignores the second (unknown) command, this should be fine, but it is relying on undocumented behaviour. cu Michael - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsof

Re: [U-Boot-Users] "stacked" memory mapped flash assisted with GPIOs

2008-01-20 Thread Michael Schwingen
oviding a NAND low-level driver which redirects to your banked flash). cu Michael - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. htt

Re: [U-Boot-Users] "stacked" memory mapped flash assisted with GPIOs

2008-01-20 Thread Michael Schwingen
ses that is big enough to map the whole flash - this is easy if the next 4MB after the physical flash location are unused, otherwise, you will have to fine a space in the memory map elsewhere. I have not yet looked at the details of working with NAND flash, but the requirements

Re: [U-Boot-Users] resend #5: [PATCH 2/5]: add AcTux-1 board support

2008-01-16 Thread Michael Schwingen
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > Ack but when applying I will do this change > > -#if (CONFIG_COMMANDS & CFG_CMD_PCI) || defined(CONFIG_PCI) > +#if defined(CONFIG_CMD_PCI) || defined(CONFIG_PCI) > It is OK for me if you do the

[U-Boot-Users] resend #5: [PATCH 2/5]: add AcTux-1 board support

2008-01-16 Thread Michael Schwingen
Signed-off-by: Michael Schwingen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/board/actux1/Makefile b/board/actux1/Makefile new file mode 100644 index 000..83611e7 --- /dev/null +++ b/board/actux1/Makefile @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +# +# (C) Copyright 2000-2006 +# Wolfgang Denk, DENX Software Engineering,

  1   2   >