Tsi Chung
Cc: Shinya Kuribayashi; U-Boot-Users; Rigby John; Mahan Kurt
Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ColdFire: Get information from the correct
GCC
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Could you confirm it builds with Today's config.mk patch by Wolfgang?
If it works (I think
Hi Kurt,
Kurt Mahan wrote:
Shinya Kuribayashi wrote:
Liew Tsi Chung wrote:
I am using Fedora 8. Also, the problem can be generated if using
Fedora 4 and 5 except 3. If you have a Fedora 4 and above, please try
it. I bet you will run into the same problem as Kurt and I did.
I ran into the
Wolfgang and Shinya,
Could you confirm it builds with Today's config.mk patch by Wolfgang?
If it works (I think it will), I'm satisfied with that.
With original $(CC) in cpu/*/config.mk and Wolfgang's config.mk patch:
Still generates the same error (see below)
Regards,
TsiChung
[snip]
Wolfgang,
Please ignore the previous email stated the new patch did not work.
Apparently, it must have been a mistake that I made after applied your
patch. Now, your patch work, still waiting for Kurt to confirm it.
Does this patch make into u-boot 1.3.3-rc3?
Thanks.
Regards,
TsiChung
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Could you confirm it builds with Today's config.mk patch by Wolfgang?
If it works (I think it will), I'm satisfied with that.
With original $(CC) in cpu/*/config.mk and Wolfgang's config.mk patch:
Still generates the same error (see below)
Can you
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat 5/3/2008 10:49 PM
To: Liew Tsi Chung
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; U-Boot-Users; Rigby John; Mahan Kurt
Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ColdFire: Get information from the correct
GCC
Liew Tsi Chung wrote:
Shinya,
Which linux distro are you using?
[snip
Liew Tsi Chung wrote:
I am using Fedora 8. Also, the problem can be generated if using Fedora
4 and 5 except 3. If you have a Fedora 4 and above, please try it. I bet
you will run into the same problem as Kurt and I did.
I can't try Fedora[458] in the immediate future, sorry. But at last I'm
Shinya Kuribayashi wrote:
Liew Tsi Chung wrote:
I am using Fedora 8. Also, the problem can be generated if using
Fedora 4 and 5 except 3. If you have a Fedora 4 and above, please try
it. I bet you will run into the same problem as Kurt and I did.
I ran into the problem with OpenSuSE 10.2
I
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I am using Fedora 8. Also, the problem can be generated if using
Fedora 4 and 5 except 3. If you have a Fedora 4 and above, please try
it. I bet you will run into the same problem as Kurt and I did.
I ran into the problem with OpenSuSE 10.2
And...
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
PLATFORM_RELFLAGS += -ffixed-d7 -msep-data
-ifeq ($(findstring 4.2,$(shell $(CC) --version)),4.2)
+ifeq ($(findstring 4.2,$(shell $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc --version)),4.2)
PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS += -mcpu=5208 -fPIC
else
PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS += -m5307
] ColdFire: Get information from the correct
GCC
Liew Tsi Chung wrote:
when gcc version is 4.2. When it comes to linking, the $(shell $(CC)
--version) becomes other value and select the -m5407 option with
different libgcc.
I reverted this $(CC)-$(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc-conversion patch and built
Liew Tsi Chung wrote:
Shinya,
Which linux distro are you using?
[snip]
-Map u-boot.map -o u-boot
m68k-uclinux-objcopy --gap-fill=0xff -O srec u-boot u-boot.srec
m68k-uclinux-objcopy --gap-fill=0xff -O binary u-boot u-boot.bin
[EMAIL
Wolfgang,
Stop! We are not talking about $(CC)gcc!
The change was this:
-ifeq ($(findstring 4.2,$(shell $(CC) --version)),4.2)
+ifeq ($(findstring 4.2,$(shell $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc --version)),4.2)
And ``$(CC)'' and ``$(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc'' should be really the same
here.
Sorry for the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
And ``$(CC)'' and ``$(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc'' should be really the same
here.
Sorry for the confusion, and yes both $(CC) and $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc are
the same. It is unsolvable behavior in ifeq (...) where $(shell $(CC)
--version) does not match 4.2 and
Liew Tsi Chung wrote:
when gcc version is 4.2. When it comes to linking, the $(shell $(CC)
--version) becomes other value and select the -m5407 option with
different libgcc.
I reverted this $(CC)-$(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc-conversion patch and built
with M54455EVB_config and CodeSourcery's
Shinya
PLATFORM_RELFLAGS += -ffixed-d7 -msep-data -ifeq ($(findstring
4.2,$(shell $(CC) --version)),4.2)
+ifeq ($(findstring 4.2,$(shell $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc --version)),4.2)
PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS += -mcpu=5208 -fPIC else PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS +=
-m5307 -fPIC
Let me make sure the intention
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Let me make sure the intention of this change. With or without this change,
we can always evaluate $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc --version, right?
Or am I missing something?
Yes, we can always evaluate $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc --version, but not
$(CC)gcc
From: TsiChung Liew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Kurt Mahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: TsiChung Liew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
cpu/mcf5227x/config.mk |2 +-
cpu/mcf523x/config.mk|2 +-
cpu/mcf52x2/config.mk|2 +-
cpu/mcf532x/config.mk|2 +-
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
From: TsiChung Liew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Kurt Mahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: TsiChung Liew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
cpu/mcf5227x/config.mk |2 +-
cpu/mcf523x/config.mk|2 +-
cpu/mcf52x2/config.mk|2 +-
Tsi-Chung Liew wrote:
cpu/mcf523x/config.mk|2 +-
cpu/mcf52x2/config.mk|2 +-
cpu/mcf532x/config.mk|2 +-
cpu/mcf5445x/config.mk |2 +-
cpu/mcf547x_8x/config.mk |2 +-
6 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpu/mcf5227x/config.mk
20 matches
Mail list logo
